Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang is a periodical scientific journal that contains research results in the field of computer science from all aspects of theory, practice and application. Papers can be in the form of technical papers or surveys of recent developments research (state-of-the-art).

Topics cover the following areas (but are not limited to):

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data
  • Business Intelligence
  • Data mining
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Intelligent Systems
  • Machine Learning
  • Network and Computer Security
  • Optimization
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Soft Computing
  • Software Engineering


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang has the following review policy:

  1. Every incoming paper will be checked using web check plagiarism (Turnitin) and grammar, for articles in English using grammarly.com, while for Indonesian language articles follow PUEBI (Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia).
  2. Articles to be published are articles which have a level of similarity of less than 20% overall, or a maximum of 3% per cited/quoted source. Article similarities will check using the Turnitin application.
  3. Every incoming paper will go through a review process.
  4. The review process uses blind peer review.
  5. In the review process, reviewers give consideration related to the novelty, scientific impact, conclusions and references used.
  6. Acceptance of an article by the Editor depends on the novelty of the research, the significance of the article, the correctness of the content, the level of originality, clarity of description, and compliance with the journal's objectives.
  7. If the review process requires a revision, it will be informed to the author on the web and via email.
  8. The revised results will be reviewed again, if they meet the requirements will be published.


Publication Frequency

The journal is published every year 4 times each March, June, September, and December


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative



Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang is a periodical scientific journal that contains research results in the field of computer science from all aspects of theory, practice and application. Papers can be in the form of technical papers or surveys of recent developments research (state-of-the-art).


Publication Ethics

This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing a manuscript in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, which is managed by the Program Studi Teknik Informatika Universitas Pamulang, including the authors, editors, and reviewers.

This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice standards.

1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of a manuscript is very important to note related to its ethics, it is also contained in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas PamulangJurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang publishes author's research results which can be accounted for. This is important for the development of knowledge and increasing its usefulness. Therefore, a coherent and respected network of knowledge needs to be carried out in the Ethics Guidelines for Journal publications. This is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the authors and supporting institutions. The manuscript in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang was conducted peer-reviewed to support and realize the scientific method. It is then important to agree on the expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing, namely the authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers and the public.

Program Studi Teknik Informatika Universitas Pamulang as the publisher of Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang takes its trusty duties beyond all the very serious publishing stages and we carry it out with ethics and other responsibilities. Program Studi Teknik Informatika Universitas Pamulang is committed to ensuring that broadcasting, reprinting or other commercial income does not have an impact or influence on editorial decisions.

2. Publication Decisions

Before publishing both Online and Print for the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, the Chief Editor in charge of publishing requested input from other editors as well as support from the reviewer. Where, it is also based on a series of journal publications starting with the submission of manuscripts, editor checks, reviewer checks, layout checks, plagiarism checks and copyrights. This was under the supervision of the Chief Editor and other Editors with authority, so that a publication decision emerged for the manuscript in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang.

3. Non-Discrimination

In each publication process of Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, the editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript for the scientific content of the manuscript without relating to race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author. This is done in order to hold the ethics of publishing the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, namely non-discrimination.

4. Confidentiality

Manuscripts published in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang are highly guarded for the value of the information, where editors and reviewers are not permitted to disclose much information about a manuscript that has been conveyed to anyone from the author, reviewer, editorial team, and publisher, but only accordingly and appropriately.

5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a manuscript submitted does not have to be used by many members of the editorial board and reviewers in his own research.


Duties and Obligations of Reviewer

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The publication of manuscripts in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang involves reviewers in their fields, the decision of the reviewer as a contribution to the editor's decision for each manuscript. Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang uses a blind-review process, where the results from reviewers are communicated back to the authors to improve the quality of the authors' research.

2. Speed

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang is very concerned about the timeliness of publication and information on the author. Every manuscript that goes to the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang is informed to the author and reviewer for the process according to the basic provisions. If the reviewer does not carry out his task on time, then the editor takes the decision to replace another reviewer of higher quality. In order to keep the publishing time, it is consistent with what is stipulated.

3. Confidentiality

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang is managed by the Program Studi Teknik Informatika Universitas Pamulang with the help of expert editors and reviewers. Every text that is entered, is kept confidential both by the editor, reviewer and publisher. Given the blind-reviewer system, each manuscript entered by reviewers can only be discussed with the content of the manuscript editor and writer.

4. Objectivity Standards

Every manuscript entered in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, editors and reviewers are required to evaluate the manuscript based on established standards. However, commentary reviews from editors and reviewers need to respect the author. And reviewers are required to be consistent with their decisions and recommendations to the editors and writers.

5. Recognition of Resources

The reviewer is required to pay attention to every source that comes from all manuscripts that enter the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, where the manuscript is sent by the author through an editor. Every source needs to know the truth and expertise, and be recognized through a trusted reference list.

6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Specific information or ideas obtained through peer reviews must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider texts which have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or also connections with writers, companies or other institutions associated with research.


Duties and Obligations of the Author

1. Reporting Standards

The authors are required to provide accounting data and informative information on the work provided to the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang. The data presented contains reference sources that can be accounted for and contained in the manuscript. Fraudulent or intentional inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

2. Data Access and Retention

The authors may be asked about the data and information on the manuscript, so they are required to provide data and information related to the manuscript on time to the editor and reviewer. This is to facilitate the refinement of the manuscript in accordance with the rules of the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang.

3. Originality and Plagiarism

Writers should ensure that they have written a fully original work, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of other people's work, then it must be properly quoted. If there are several problems related to quotation and/or plagiarism in the author's work, then the script is automatically rejected.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

When the authors submit the manuscript for publication in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, the author is not permitted to send the manuscript to other publishers simultaneously. Simultaneous submissions from the authors are considered unethical and unacceptable for the manuscript.

5. Recognition of Resources

Every manuscript sent by the author in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang must provide recognition of appropriate sources and be able to add value to the manuscript, all such confessions must be clearly stated in the reference list.

6. Research Authorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscript sent to the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang. The authors listed in the manuscript have a responsibility to keep the co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to provide a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.

7. Dangers and Subjects of Humans or Animals

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or tools that have many hazards that are not normally inherent in the use of the writer, they must clearly identify all of these things in the text.

8. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All writers should express in their manuscript everything that supports their research is completed. All supporters of financial resources for research should be disclosed.

9. Fundamental Mistakes in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a published work, the author's obligation is to immediately notify the editor or publisher of the journal and work with the editor to withdraw or correct the research.

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang
Program Studi Teknik Informatika
Universitas Pamulang - Kampus Viktor Lt. 6
Jalan Raya Puspitek No. 46 Buaran, Serpong, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia



The papers published in the Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang will be consider to retract in the publication if:

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research


The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.


Editorial and Publishing Process


Indexing and Abstracting

Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang has been indexed in:


Author Fees

Starting in 2023 Volume 8 Issue 1, Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang charges the following fees:
Submission Fee: Rp. 0,-
Review Process Fee: Rp. 0,-
Article Publication Fee: Rp. 500.000,-
Publication fees will be billed after the article is declared Accepted.


Review Guidelines

General Policies and Procedures

  1. Reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions, make sure that the manuscript topic fits with the journal’s scope, and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  2. Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
  3. Review process should be conducted objectively based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of author(s). Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  4. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. The submitted manuscript should not be retained or copied.
  5. Privileged information or ideas obtained through review process must be kept confidential. Reviewers should not make any use of the data, arguments, or interpretations, unless they have the authors’ permission. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Any observed conflict of interest during the review process must be communicated to the Editor.
  6. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The references should be written using American Psychological Association (APA) style. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.


Review Steps

1. Notify the submission's editor as to whether you will undertake the review.
Response Will do the review Mail Unable to do the review Mail
Choose the appropriate option, you will do the review or unable to do the review.

2. If you are going to do the review, consult Reviewer Guidelines below.

3. Click on file names to download and review (on screen or by printing) the files associated with this submission.
Submission Manuscript [File-Name-Review-Version.EXT] [Submission Date]
Supplementary File(s) None

4. Click on icon to fill in the review form.
[Review Form]
Select article quality, option:

5. In addition, you can upload files for the editor and/or author to consult.
Uploaded files [File-Name-Reviewed.EXT]
[[Choose File] [File-Name-Reviewed.EXT]] Upload

6. Select a recommendation and submit the review to complete the process. You must enter a review or upload a file before selecting a recommendation.

Recommendation [Choose One] [Submit Review to Editor]
-Accept Submission
-Revisions Required
-Resubmit for Review
-Resubmit Elsewhere
-Decline Submission
-See Comments


Letter of Management Team Assignment

  1. 2020-2021
  2. 2022-2024