EPIC

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Instrumentation and Control, Industrial Automation, Mechatronic and Robotic, Electronic and Microelectronic, Embedded System, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic Material, Biosensor, Power System, Power Transmission, Smart Grid, Protection and Insulation, Power Generation, New and Renewable/Green Energy, energy conversion, conservation and management, information and communication technology (ICT).

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Journal of Electrical Power, Instrumentation and Control (EPIC), receives many article related to submissions to be published. Thus, peer-reviewers accept articles selectively and  reject the papers which may need intolerable revisions. To be published in the EPIC Journal, a paper should meet four general criteria:

-          Presenting considerable evidence for its conclusions.

-          Clear novelty.

-          Distinct significance for scientists in the field.

-          Open for inter or multi disciplinary studies.

Overall, the acceptable paper should represent an outstanding comprehension which is liable to inspire the thinking develepment of the field. There should be a perceptible reason as to why the work deserves to be published in the EPIC Journal.

The review process

Each submitted manuscripts is  read by the editorial staff. Only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for full peer review. Those papers assessed by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly based on internal and external advice from reviewer specialists in the field).

The potential manuscripts to our readership interest are sent for the next review, at least by two reviewers. The editors then take a decision based on the reviewers' recommendation.

Peer-reviewer Selection

Reviewer selection is essential for publication process based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations and our experience of reviewing the publication process.  Furthermore, we ensure the potential reviewers before sending them manuscripts to review.

Writing the review

The main purpose of the review is to provide the editors with the information needed to determine the accepted manuscripts. The review should also advise the authors as to how they can rewrite for better paper to comply with editorial requirements. As far as possible, a negative review should explain to the authors the weaknesses of their manuscript, so that rejected authors can understand the basis for the decision and see in broad terms what needs to be done to improve the manuscript. This is secondary to the other functions, however, and referees should not feel obliged to provide detailed, constructive advice to the authors of papers that do not meet the criteria for the journal (as outlined in the letter from the editor when asking for the review).

Anonymity

We conduct double-blind review so to authors and the reviewer unknown each other. Unless the reviewers feel so strongly to identify the author, nonetheless, we prefer that reviewers are anonymous throughout the review process and beyond.

Peer-review publication policies

All contributions submitted to the specialists for education area that are selected for peer-review. No less than two selected reviewers read the propective articles.

Ethics and security

Journal of Electrical Power, Instrumentation and Control editors may seek advice about submitted papers not only from technical reviewers but also on any aspect of a paper that raises concerns. These may include, for example, ethical issues or issues of access to data or materials. Very occasionally, concerns may also relate to the implications to society of publishing a paper, including threats to security. In such circumstances, advice will usually be sought simultaneously with the technical peer-review process. Overall, publishing decisions, the ultimate decision as to whether to publish is the responsibility of the editor of the journal concerned.

 

Publication Frequency

Journal EPIC published twice (2) in a year (1 volume with 2 number)

Jurnal ini dipublikasi dua kali dalam setahun.

 

Open Access Policy

 

Journal of Electrical Power, Instrumentation and Control adhere to Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

Journal of Electrical Power, Instrumentation and Control menganut lisensi Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

 

 

Publication Ethics

EPIC (Journal of Electrical Power, Instrumentation and COntrol) adalah jurnal nasional elektronik yang ditelaah oleh mitra bestari, tersedia dalam bentuk cetakan dan online serta diterbitkan dua kali dalam setahun. Jurnal ini mengikuti panduan tentang Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah yang bersumber dari COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) dalam menghadapi semua aspek etika publikasi, dan khususnya bagaimana menangani kasus kesalahan penelitian dan publikasi. Pernyataan ini menjelaskan etika perilaku dari semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan sebuah artikel di jurnal ini, termasuk Penulis, Ketua Dewan Redaksi, Dewan Redaksi, Mitra Bestari dan penerbit.

Tanggungjawab Editor

  1. Editor bertanggungjawab dalam memutuskan artikel yang layak dipublikasikan melalui rapat dewan redaksi. Editor dipandu oleh kebijakan dewan editorial jurnal dan dibatasi oleh persyaratan hukum yang berlaku mengenai pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta dan plagiarisme.
  2. Dalam proses penerimaan artikel, tim editor berasaskan pada asas kesamaan perlakuan.
  3. Dalam proses review jurnal dan pengambilan keputusan publikasi (artikel), tim editor tidak membedakan ras, jenis kelamin, agama, etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau ideologi politik penulis.
  4. Editor dan tim editorial tidak akan mengungkapkan setiap informasi tentang naskah atau artikel yang masuk kecuali atas izin penulisnya.
  5. Naskah (artikel) yang tidak diterbitkan setelah diajukan tidak akan digunakan oleh penelitian editor sendiri dan akan dikembalikan langsung kepada penulisnya.

Tanggungjawab Reviewer

Reviewer membantu editor dalam membuat keputusan editorial terhadap naskah/artikel yang masuk

  1. Reviewer bertanggungjawab terhadap rekomendasi arikel yang direview.
  2. Review naskah dilakukan secara obyektif, dan didukung oleh argumentasi yang jelas.
  3. Reviewer bertanggungjawab terhadap kutipan, referensi, dan plagiarisme atas artikel yang direview.
  4. Reviewer menjaga kerahasiaan informasi untuk keuntungan pribadi.

Tanggungjawab Penulis

  1. Penulis harus menyajikan artikel hasil pemikiran atau penelitiannya secara jelas, jujur, dan tanpa plagiasi, dan manipulasi data.
  2. Penulis bertanggungjawab atas konfirmasi yang diajukan atas artikel yang telah ditulis.
  3. Penulis harus mematuhi persyaratan publikasi berupa orisinalitas karya, tidak plagiat, dan belum pernah diterbitkan di jurnal atau publikasi lain.
  4. Penulis harus menunjukkan rujukan dari pendapat dan karya orang lain yang dikutip.
  5. Penulis harus menulis naskah atau artikel secara etis, jujur dan bertanggung jawab, sesuai dengan peraturan kepenulisan ilmiah yang berlaku.
  6. Penulis dilarang mengirimkan/menerbitkan artikel yang sama ke lebih dari satu jurnal atau publikasi.
  7. Penulis tidak berkeberatan jika naksah mengalami penyuntingan tanpa mengubah subtansi atau ide pokok tulisan.

Tanggungjawab Penerbit (Publisher)

  1. Program Studi Teknik Elektro Universitas Pamulang bertanggungjawab menerbitkan artikel yang setelah melalui proses editing, peer review, layout sesuai dengan aturan penerbitan Jurnal Ilmiah.
  2. Program Studi Teknik Elektro Universitas Pamulang sebagai penerbit bertanggungjawab menjamin kebebasan akademik bagi para editor dan reviewer dalam menjalankan tugasnya maisng-masing.
  3. Program Studi Teknik Elektro Universitas Pamulang sebagai penerbit bertanggungjawab menjaga privasi dan melindungi kekayaan intelektual dan hak cipta, dan kebebasan editorial.