STUDENT’S SELF-CONCEPT PROFILES IN PROBLEM POSING ACCORDING TO COGNITIVE STYLES: DEVELOPING AN EVIDENCE BASE FOR BEST PRACTICE OF E-LEARNING IN MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS COURSE AT PAMULANG UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jsmu.v1i2.2379Keywords:
Konsep Diri, Kecemasan, Pemecahan Masalah, Gaya KognitifAbstract
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dan bersifat eksploratif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan konsep diri mahasiswa dalam pengajuan masalah matematika bisnis ditinjau dari perbedaan gaya kognitif, yaitu field dependent dan field independent. Subjek penelitian ini terdiri dari dua mahasiswa , berjenis kelamin perempuan. Penelitian dimulai dengan menentukan subjek penelitian menggunakan instrument GEFT. Perbedaan gaya kognitif, kesamaan jenis kelamin, kemampuan berkomunikasi dan kesediaan mahasiswa juga menjadi pertimbangan peneliti untuk memilih subjek, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan memberikan tugas pemecahan masalah, wawancara dan pengamatan. Pengecekan keabsahan data menggunakan triangulasi waktu. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa subjek bergaya kognitif field dependent berusaha dalam memecahkan masalah matematika bisnis walau menghadapi beberapa kesulitan dan merasa tidak yakin dapat memecahkan masalah matematika bisnis dengan benar. Selain itu, subjek bergaya kognitif field dependent merasa gugup, tegang dan khawatir tetapi tidak menunjukan perubahan fisiologis dan menjelaskan secara garis besar tentang pemecahan masalah matematika bisnis. Di sisi lain, subjek bergaya kognitif field independent berusaha terus dalam memecahkan masalah matematika bisnis walau menghadapi kesulitan dan merasa yakin dapat memecahkan masalah matematika bisnis. Subjek bergaya kognitif field independent tidak merasa gugup, tegang dan khawatir tetapi mengeluarkan keringat pada telapak tangan dan menjelaskan secara terperinci tentang pemecahan masalah.
References
Andong, Andi. Proses Berpikir Siswa yang Memiliki Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Divergen. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Surabaya State University. (2011).
Altun, Arif. “Undergraduate Student’s Academic Achievement Field Independent/ Independent Cognitive Style And Attitude toward Computerâ€. Educational Technology and Society 2006, Vol. 9. No. 1. 289-297. http://www.ifets.info/journals/9_1/23.pdf (2006).
Calhoun, J. F., & Acocella, J. R. Psychology of Adjustment Human Relationship. New York: McGraw-Hill. (1990)
Ellis, R. A., Ginns, P., & Piggot, L. E-learning in Higher Education: Some Key Aspects and Their Relationship to Approaches to Study. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 303. Retrieved from informaworld.com/10.1080/072943609028399. (2009)
Governors Sate University, Center for Online Learning and Teaching. E-learning Glossary. Retrieved from govst.edu/elearning/default.aspx. (2008)
Guri-Rosenblit, S. Distance Education and E-learning: Not the Same Thing. Higher Education, 49(4), 467-493. (2005)
Guvercin, S., & Verbovsiy, V., The Effect of Problem Posing Tasks Used in Mathematics Instruction to Mathematics Academic Achievement and Attitude toward Mathematics. International Online Journal of Primary Education vol 3 issue 2. (2014)
Jereb, E., & Smintek, B. Applying Multimedia Instruction in E-learning. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 43(1), 15-27. (2006)
Kaur, Berinderjeet, Yeap, Ban Har & Kapur, Manu. Mathematical Problem Solving. Singapore: World Scientific. (2009)
Koohang, A. & Harman, K. Open Source: A Metaphor for E-learning. Informing Science Journal, 8, 75-86. (2005)
Lee, Mark J. W. & McLoughlin, Catherine. Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Web Based Learning Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching. (2011)
Li, F. W., Lau, R. W., & Dharmendran, P. A three-tier Profiling Framework for Adaptive E-learning., Aachen. (2009)
Liao, H. & Lu, H. Richness Versus Parsimony Antecedents of Technology Adoption Model for E-learning Websites. Retrieved from dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85033-5_2. (2008)
Marques, P. Definition of e-learning. Retrieved from pangea.org/peremarques.
Markus, H. & Nurius, P. “Possible Selvesâ€. American Psychologist. 41(9): 954-969. (1986)
Ministry of Communication and Technology of New Zealand. Digital Strategy of the Ministry of Communication and Technology. Retrieved from digitalstrategy.govt.nz/resources/glossary-of-key-terms/. (2008)
Mulyono. Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Field Independent dan Field Dependent dalam Merekonstruksi Konsep Grafik Fungsi Berorientasi pada APOS. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Surabaya State University. (2011)
Myers, David G. Social Psychology (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. (2009)
Sangra, A., Vlachopoulus, D., & Cabrera, N. Building an Inclusive Definition of E-learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework. Irrodl vol 13, no 2. (2012) of a Communities of Inquiry in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Computers & Education vol 55 issue 4 1721-1731. (2010)
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T., Learning Presence: Towards a Theory of Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, and The Development
Shavelson, Richard J. and Bolus, Roger. Self-Concept: The Interplay of Theory and Methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 1, 1982 pp. 3-7. (1981)
Singer, Florence Mihaela, & Ellerton, Nerida F. Mathematical Problem Posing From Research to Effective Practice. New York: Springer. (2015)
Slavin, Robert E. Educational Psychology : Theory and Practice 6th edition. Massachusetts : Allyn and Bacon Publisher. (2006)
Stoyanova, Elena. Empowering Students’ Problem Solving via Problem Posing: The Art of Framing ‘Good’ Questions. Eric. (2000)
Wenglinsky, Harold. Measuring Self-Concept and Relating It to Academic Achievement: Statistical Analyses of the Marsh Self-Description Questionnaire. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service. (1996)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This content licensing is in accordance with a CC license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-SA.
