Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The focus of this journal is related to current issues around the field of Sustainable Economics, especially regarding management and accounting. The scope of this journal is the science of management which includes human resource management, marketing, and financial management. In addition, the scope relating to accounting includes: financial accounting, the public sector, corporate governance, sustainability reporting, attestation services, accounting information systems, capital and investment markets, and taxation


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi receives many articles related to submissions to be published. Thus, peer-reviewers accept articles selectively and reject the papers which may need intolerable revisions. To be published in the Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi, a paper should meet four general criteria:

-          Presenting considerable evidence for its conclusions.

-          Clear novelty.

-          Distinct significance for scientists in the field.

-          Open for inter or multidisciplinary studies.

Overall, the acceptable paper should represent an outstanding comprehension which is liable to inspire the thinking development of the field. There should be a perceptible reason as to why the work deserves to be published in the Keberlanjutan Journal.

The review process

Each submitted manuscripts is read by the editorial staff. Only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for full peer review. Those papers assessed by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly based on internal and external advice from reviewer specialists in the field).

The potential manuscripts to our readership interest are sent for the next review, at least by two reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewers' recommendation.

Peer-reviewer Selection

Reviewer selection is essential for publication process based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, and our experience of reviewing the publication process.  Furthermore, we ensure the potential reviewers before sending them manuscripts to review.

Writing the review

The main purpose of the review is to provide the editors with the information needed to determine the accepted manuscripts. The review should also advise the authors as to how they can rewrite for a better paper to comply with editorial requirements. As far as possible, a negative review should explain to the authors the weaknesses of their manuscript, so that rejected authors can understand the basis for the decision and see in broad terms what needs to be done to improve the manuscript. This is secondary to the other functions, however, and referees should not feel obliged to provide detailed, constructive advice to the authors of papers that do not meet the criteria for the journal (as outlined in the letter from the editor when asking for the review).


We conduct double-blind review so to the authors and the reviewer unknown each other. Unless the reviewers feel so strongly to identify the author, nonetheless, we prefer that reviewers are anonymous throughout the review process and beyond.

Peer-review publication policies

All contributions submitted to the specialists for the education area that are selected for peer-review. No less than two selected reviewers read the prospective articles.

Ethics and security

Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi editors may seek advice about submitted papers not only from technical reviewers but also on any aspect of a paper that raises concerns. These may include, for example, ethical issues or issues of access to data or materials. Very occasionally, concerns may also relate to the implications to society of publishing a paper, including threats to security. In such circumstances, advice will usually be sought simultaneously with the technical peer-review process. Overall, publishing decisions, the ultimate decision as to whether to publish is the responsibility of the editor of the journal concerned


Publication Frequency

This journal is published twice a year, in July and December


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative





This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Author Fees

Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manjemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi is free for submission and publication


Publication Ethics

Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi is a blind-reviewed journal published periodically twice a year (July and December). The journal publishes papers in the field of management, accounting, and finance that give a significant contribution to the development of management and accounting practices in Indonesia.

The publication of an article in a blind-reviewed journal is an essential part of the development of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Blind-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the journal editor, the reviewer, and the author. These ethical guidelines are adopted from the publication ethics policy of standard COPE’s Best Practice.

1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of a manuscript is very important to consider related to its ethics, this also includes the Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi. SKeberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi publish the results of both theoretical and empirical studies from a variety of author sources that can be accounted for. This is important for the development of knowledge to be implemented in developing the economy of a country. Thus, a coherent and respected network of knowledge needs to be carried out in the Ethics Guidelines for Journal publications. This is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the authors and supporting institutions. Manuscripts in Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi are peer-reviewed to support and realize the scientific method. It is then important to agree on expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing, namely the authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.

Pamulang University D3 Accounting Program as a publisher of Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi take its trusty duties beyond all stages of publishing very seriously and we carry it out with ethics and other responsibilities. Pamulang University D3 Accounting Program is committed to ensuring that broadcasting, reprinting or other commercial income does not have an impact or influence on editorial decisions.

2. Publication Decisions

Before publishing both Online and Print for Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi, the Chief Editor in charge of publishing requests input from other editors as well as support from the reviewer. Where, it is also based on a series of journal publications starting with the submission of manuscripts, checking of editors, checking of reviewers, checking of layouts, checking of plagiarism, and copyrights. This is under the supervision of the Chief Editor and other Editors with authority so that a publication decision arises for the manuscript on Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi.

3. Non-Discrimination

In each of the Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi publishing processes: Management Journal and Accounting Journal, the editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript for the scientific content of the manuscript without relating to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author. This is done to hold the ethics of publishing Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi that is non-discrimination.

4. Confidentiality

Manuscripts published in Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi are very much preserved, where the editors and reviewers are not permitted to disclose much information about a manuscript that has been submitted to anyone from the authors, reviewers, editorial team, and publishers, but only those according and reasonable.

5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a manuscript submitted does not have to be used by many members of the editorial board and reviewers in his research.


Duties and Obligations of Reviewer

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Publishing manuscripts on Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi involves reviewers in their field, the decision of the reviewer as a contribution to the editor's decision for each manuscript. Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi uses a single-blind review process, where the results of the reviewer are communicated back to the author to improve the quality of the authors' research.

2. Speed

Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi pays close attention to the timeliness of publications and information on the authors. Every text that goes into Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi is informed to the author and reviewer for the process as the basic provisions. If the reviewer does not carry out their work on time, the editor decides to replace another reviewer of higher quality. To keep the publishing time, it is consistent with what is stipulated.

3. Confidentiality

SKeberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi are managed by the D3 Accounting Study Program at the University of Pamulang with assistance from expert editors and reviewers. Every text that is entered, is kept confidential by both the editor, reviewer, and publisher. Given the blind-reviewer system, each manuscript entered by reviewers can only be discussed with the content of the manuscript editor and writer.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
When the authors submit the manuscript for publication in Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi, the author is not permitted to send the manuscript to other publishers simultaneously. Simultaneous submission from the author is considered unethical and unacceptable for the manuscript.
5. Recognition of Resources
Every manuscript sent by the author to Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi at Pamulang University is obliged to provide acknowledgment of appropriate sources and to be able to add value to the manuscript, all such acknowledgments must be clearly stated in the reference list.
6. Research Authorship
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscript sent to Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi at Pamulang University. The authors listed in the manuscript have a responsibility to keep the co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to provide a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.
7. Dangers and Subjects of Humans or Animals
If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or tools that have many hazards that are not normally inherent in the use of the writer, they must identify all of these things in the text.
8. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All writers should express in their manuscript everything that supports their research is completed. All supporters of financial resources for research should be disclosed.
 9. Fundamental Mistakes in Published Works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, the author should immediately notify the editor or publisher of the journal and work with the editor to withdraw or correct the research.


Plagiarism Check

Each manuscript will be checked using Turnitin to ensure the originality.


Reference Manager

References in this journal use Mendeley