INFLUENCE OF NPL, BOPO, CAR, NIM AND LDR ON AUDIT OPINION (GC) WITH INTERVENING (ROA)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/eaj.v2i3.y2019.p215-221

Keywords:

Accounting

Abstract

This research aims to test the financial ratio as an indicator of financial soundness such as variables Non Performing Loan(NPL), Operational expense to Operational income(BOPO), Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR), Loan to deposit Ratio(LDR),Net Interest Margin(NIM) and Return On Asset on the acceptance of going concern audit opinion. The object of this research is the banking companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012 - 2016. Technique sample is saturated sample.The statistical analysis use logistic regression,Linear regression,Simple linear regression and path analysis. Opinion given by the auditor is one of the considerations from auditor to indicate existence of conditions and events whether there is substantial doubt on the company's ability to survive (going concern). Opinion going concern is used as an early warning for user’s of financial statements to avoid mistakes  before decide. The result of research for hypothesis 1 can be seen that Non Performing Loan(NPL) and Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR) does not have a significant effect on Return On Asset’s, while Operational expense to Operational income(BOPO), Loan to deposit Ratio(LDR) and Net Interest Margin(NIM) have as significant effect on Return On Asset.The result of research for hypothesis II can be seen that Non Performing Loan(NPL) and Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR), Operational expense to Operational income(BOPO), Loan to deposit Ratio(LDR) does not have a significant effect on going concern audit opinion’s, while Net Interest Margin(NIM) have as significant effect on Return On Asset on going concern audit opinion’s. and The last result of research for hypothesis III can be seen that Return On Asset have as significant effect on going concern audit opinion’s.

Author Biography

Syarifudin Syarifudin, Pamulang University

S1 Accounting

References

Usman, B. (2003). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dalam Memprediksi Perubahan Laba pada Bank-Bank di Indonesia. Media Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, 3(1), 59-74.

Sugiyanto, F. X., Prasetiono, P., & Hariyanto, T. (2002). Manfaat indikator-indikator keuangan dalam pembentukan model prediksi kondisi kesehatan perbankan. Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 10, 11-26.

Nusantara, A. B. (2009). Analisis pengaruh NPL, CAR, LDR, dan BOPO terhadap profitabilitas bank (perbandingan bank umum go publik dan bank umum non go publik diIndonesia periode tahun 2005-2007). Doctoral dissertation program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Nugroho, A. W. (2011). Analisis Pengaruh FDR, NPF, BOPO, KAP, dan PLO Terhadap ROA Studi pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia Periode Tahun 2006-2010. Doctoral dissertation Diponegoro University.

Safuttra, A. K. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Asset-Liability Management (ALMA) Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Bank Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Manajemen Update, 7(4).

Santosa, A. F., & Wedari, L. K. (2007). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UII, 11(2).

Rini, D.A.P. (2008). Penggunaan Rasio Keuangan dalam Memprediksi Perubahan Laba pada Masa yang Akan Datang (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEJ). Doctoral dissertation Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Widyantari, A. P. (2011). Opini Audit Going Concern dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi: Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. A thesis presented to the Graduate Program of Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.

Januarti, I. (2002). Variabel Proksi CAMEL dan Karakteristik Bank Lainnya Untuk Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Bank di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro).

Simamora, H. (2000). Akuntansi Basis Pengambilan Keputusan Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono, D. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Imam, G. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21 Edisi 7. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas iponegoro (Doctoral dissertation, thesis. binus. ac. id/Doc/Bab3Doc/2014-2-1537-AK% 20Bab3001. doc. Diakses 13 Juli 2016).

Agoes, S. (2004). Auditing: (Pemeriksaan Akuntan) oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik Jilid I. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Belkaoui, A. R. (2006). Teori Akuntansi (Edisi Terjemahan) Jilid 1.

Kurniati, W. (2012). Prediksi Kebangkrutan, pertumbuhan dan reputasi KAP terhadap opini audit going concern. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1(1).

Halim, A. (2008). Auditing (Dasar-dasar audit laporan keuangan). UUP STIM.

Hanafi, M. M. (2004). Manajemen keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Indrayani, N., & Sri Mindarti, C. (2012). Going Concern dan Opini Audit (Suatu Studi pada Perusahaan Perbankan di BEI). Students' Journal of Accounting and Banking Open Journal (1).

Husnan, S., & Pudjiastuti, E. (2006). Dasar-dasar manajemen keuangan edisi kelima. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Keuangan, D. S. A. (2007). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Januarti, I. (2009). Analisis pengaruh faktor perusahaan, kualitas auditor, kepemilikan perusahaan terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern (perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia).

Junaidi & Hartono, J. (2010). Faktor Non Keuangan Pada Opini Audit Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII.

Jusup, A. H. (2001). Auditing (pengauditan). Bagian Penerbitan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Published

2019-10-03