THE INFLUENCE OF ETHICAL LEADERSHIP ON GEN Z RESILIENCE THROUGH PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN INDUSTRY 5.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/ebic.v2i1.51349Keywords:
Ethical Leadership, Resilience, Gen Z, Proactive Behavior, Industry 5.0Abstract
Industry 5.0 marks a paradigm shift in the world of work by integrating technological advancements with a human-cantered approach. In this context, Generation Z, as the emerging workforce, faces complex challenges that demand a high level of resilience. This study aims to systematically examine how ethical leadership contributes to the development of Gen Z resilience, considering the mediating roles of proactive behavior and technological innovation. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach was employed to analyse relevant scientific literature from various reputable academic databases. The findings reveal that ethical leadership fosters a supportive and psychologically safe work environment, which in turn encourages proactive behavior and engagement with technological innovation. Proactive behaviour is proven to be an adaptive mechanism that strengthens individual endurance against work-related stress, while technology serves as a medium for self-actualization among Gen Z employees. Ethical leadership, proactivity, and technology are interrelated in building robust resilience, both technically and emotionally. This study provides theoretical contributions to leadership and human resource management literature, as well as practical implications for organizations in developing more adaptive, inclusive, and sustainable talent management strategies in the era of Industry 5.0.
References
Aksakal, N. Y., & Ulucan, E. (2024). Revealing the Leadership Characteristics of the Modern Age: Generation-Z Perspective. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 13(1).
Alamsyah, M. N., Atmoko, A., Hidayah, N., & Peng, Y. (2025). Exploring Protean Career Orientation: Career Strategies for Generation Z in the 21st Century. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 7(2), 94-106.
Ang, W. H. D., Shorey, S., Lopez, V., Chew, H. S. J., & Lau, Y. (2022). Generation Z undergraduate students’ resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Current Psychology, 41(11), 8132-8146.
Anggraeni, A. I. (2022). Managing Generation Z: Eudaimonic Perspective. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Dan Ekonomi, 24(2), 23-37.
Berg, T., & Carson, T. (2020). Resilience in the business curriculum: A biblical perspective and directions for future research. Christian Business Academy Review, 15.
Boyden, G. L., Brisbois, M. D., Kellogg, M. B., & Foli, K. J. (2024). Understanding Resilience Among Generation Z Baccalaureate Nursing Students: A Hermeneutical Phenomenology Study. Journal of Nursing Education, 63(7), 460-469.
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew research center, 17(1), 1-7.
Dirik, D., Aktan, A., & Ateşci, Ö. (2025). A SCOPING REVIEW ON GENERATION Z'S LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE AND EXPECTATIONS. Management Research & Practice, 17(1).
Dobrowolski, Z., Drozdowski, G., & Panait, M. (2022). Understanding the impact of Generation Z on risk management—A preliminary views on values, competencies, and ethics of the Generation Z in public administration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3868.
Hill, J., Kim, M., Oja, B. D., Kim, H. S., & Lee, H. W. (2024). Innovation is the key: identifying factors to increase career satisfaction and psychological well-being in millennial and generation Z sport employees. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 360-379.
Jasin, D., Hansaram, S. K., Hansaram, R., & Chong, K. L. (2023). Generation Z Behavioral Intentions towards Social Entrepreneurship. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci, 13.
Κatsaros, K. K. (2025a). Gen Z Employees’ Adaptive Performance in Hybrid Workplaces: The Role of Inclusive Leadership, Creativity, and Work Engagement. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 00218863251315493.
Katsaros, K. K. (2025b). Gen Z Tourism Employees’ Adaptive Performance During a Major Cultural Shift: The Impact of Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 171.
Kim, M., Jun, J., Lambert, J., Duah, H., Tucker, S. J., O’Mathúna, D. P., ... & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2024). Generational Differences in Moral Injury, Resilience, and Well-Being Among Nurses: Predictors of Intention to Leave Position and Profession. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(11), 909-918.
Lee, Y. K. (2021). Impacts of digital technostress and digital technology self-efficacy on Fintech usage intention of Chinese Gen Z consumers. Sustainability, 13(9), 5077.
Lhakard, P. (2024). Organizational citizenship behavior for preparing gen-z in the modern era: a comprehensive review. World Journal of Management Science, 2(2), 64-71.
Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., & Trancoso, T. (2024). From Risk to Reward: understanding the influence of Generation Z and personality factors on sustainable entrepreneurial behaviour. FIIB Business Review, 23197145241271467.
Narojczyk, S., & Nowak, D. (2024). Entrepreneurship from the perspective of the Generation Z (Gen Z). Management, 28(2).
Nguyen, M. T., & Petchsawang, P. (2024). Encouraging employees’ innovative behavior via the mediating effect of work engagement and the moderating effect of their proactive personality: the case of Generation Z in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2301162.
Ozturk, U., & Yildirim, E. (2023). The evaluation of generation Z in innovation of career success: Comparative analysis with Generation Y. Marketing i menedžment innovacij, 14(2), 115-126.
Paulišić, M. (2024). Workplaces: Is There a Difference in Burnout Between Generation Y and Generation Z. IBSCO, 2, 1-19.
Phuong, N. T. H., Thuy, N. D., Giang, T. L., Han, B. T. N., Hieu, T. H., & Long, N. T. (2022). Determinants of intention to use Fintech payment services: Evidence from Vietnam generation Z. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 26(1), 354-366.
Putri, S. D. T., Salendu, A., & Pahlawan, A. W. (2025). Understanding turnover intention in Gen Z: Servant leadership and ethical climate in organization. Asian Management and Business Review, 5(1), 216-230.
Seyfi, S., Vo-Thanh, T., & Zaman, M. (2024). Hospitality in the age of Gen Z: a critical reflection on evolving customer and workforce expectations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(13), 118-134.
Sigaeva, N. (2019). Leadership Styles and Employee Engagement: Generation Z Perspective in Russia (Master's thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)-Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ)).
Sigaeva, N., Arasli, H., Ozdemir, E., Atai, G., & Capkiner, E. (2022). In search of effective Gen Z engagement in the hospitality industry: Revisiting issues of servant and authentic leadership. Sustainability, 14(20), 13105.
Soelaiman, L., Herwindiati, D. E., & Payangan, O. R. (2023). Empowering the Role of Generation Z As Agents of Change Through Techno-Sociopreneurship. Sey bold Report Journal, 18(09), 74-90.
Sumantri, B. A., Anas, M., Yulianto, D., & Riani, L. P. (2024). Formation of the Concept of Independent, Wise, Innovative, and Resilient Human Resources in Gen Z: Digital Multi-Stakeholder Cooperatives for Business Knowledge Management. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 11775-11785.
Wawer, M., Grzesiuk, K., & Jegorow, D. (2022). Smart mobility in a Smart City in the context of Generation Z sustainability, use of ICT, and participation. Energies, 15(13), 4651.
Wulur, L., & Mandagi, D. W. (2023). Employee performance 2.0: Antecedents and consequences of Gen Z employees performance. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 224-240.
Yusuff, M. I., Ahmad, Z., Sophian, A., & Amir, A. (2023). ENGINEERING ETHICS FOR GENERATION Z: A REVIEW OF CURRENT APPROACHES AND PROPOSAL FOR FUTURE DIRECTIONS. International Journal on Integration of Knowledge, 1(2), 36-47.
Zahra, Y., Handoyo, S., & Fajrianthi, F. (2025). A comprehensive overview of Generation Z in the workplace: Insights from a scoping review. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 51(1), 1-11.
