Preference Organization Analysis on The NCT Show: Music Space with Johnny and Mark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/efn.v9i1.48145Keywords:
conversation, conversation analysis, preference organization, talk show, The NCT ShowAbstract
This research uses conversation analysis to dig deeper into human conversation, especially in the context of talk show. The main purpose of this research is to examine the types and strategies of preference organization used by participants in talk shows. The theory used is Levinson’s preference organization theory. The research method applied is a descriptive qualitative method. The result of this research is that there are 61 data found, with a distribution of 5 request data, 4 invite data, 33 assessment data, 18 question data, and 1 blame data. In conclusion, preferred responses are dominant in this talk show. The large number of preferred responses in the talk show indicates a generally positive and cooperative communication environment. This is due to the close relationship between the participants. They share the same knowledge of the topic of discussion.
References
Al-Darraji, H. H. A., Foo, T. C. V., Ismail, S. A. M., & Abdulah, E. S. (2013). Cultural Values Underlying Speech Act of Inviting: The Case of Iraqi EFL Speakers. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(8).
Amalia, D., Rachmadhani, J., & Sinaga, L. S. M. (2022). The Study of Conversational Style and Preference Structure in Deddy Corbuzier’s Podcast: Anies Baswedan Episode. TRANSFORM Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED, 10(3), Article 3. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jelt/article/view/34468
Blythe, J. (2013). Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language, 89(4), 883–919. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0057
Cutting, J. (2005). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1997). Questions. In Handbook of Logic and Language (pp. 1055–1124). Elsevier. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259810898_Questions
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2021). Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Ilenia, O. F., & Yustisiana, A. (2022). Speech style used in Jimmy Kimmel Live talk show. Rainbow : Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v11i2.58021
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Safont Jordà, P. (2008). The Speech Act of Requesting. 68, 41–64.
Scanlon, T. (2008). Moral dimensions: Permissibility, meaning, blame. Harvard University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/SCAMDP
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place. Macmillan.
Setiawan, D., Ningtyas, Z. M., & Lisdawati, I. (2019). Analyze Turn Taking about Education for Everyone on Channel YouTube. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i4.p489-493
Sorjonen, M.-L., & Hakulinen, A. (2009). Alternative responses to assessments. In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 281–303). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.010
Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (Bandung). Alfabeta. //digilib.unigres.ac.id%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D43
Tampubolon, T. (2019). A Conversation Analysis of Adjacency Pairs in the Ellen DeGeneres’s Talk Show with Malala Yousafzai. Journal of Language Learning and Research, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22236/jollar.v2i1.3492
