Catatan Penilaian Ketercapaian Perguruan Tinggi dalam Menerapkan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (E-Learning) di Universitas Pamulang, Universitas Terbuka, dan Universitas Bina Nusantara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/eduka.v7i1.13256Abstract
The research conducted by the researcher aims to find information regarding the readiness of students in distance learning using the e-learning lecture model, the process of implementing e-learning learning in teaching and learning activities, the inhibiting factors for using online lectures. Thus, the results of the study showed that students were ready to accept the online learning process and their readiness in the application of ICT, however, several obstacles were found in the distance lecture process, such as the internet signal network that was not supported and adequate so that the process of implementing online lectures was not optimal.It was found that the aspects that became obstacles in distance learning using e-learning, which found 3 factors in it, namely: the lack of knowledge dissemination about e-learning lectures was less intense, there was still at least the use of tools and features provided in the e-learning model and still found "404 not found" because the destination website is experiencing problems.
Keywords: Evaluation; E-learning; BINUS; UT; UNPAM;
References
Abiola, T. (2015). Psychometric assessment of the Wagnild and Young's resilience scale in Kano, Nigeria. BMC Research Notes. 4(1). 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756- 0500-4-509
Blackwell CK, Lauricella AR, Wartella E. (2016). Computers & Education Factors in fl uencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Educational Technology Publications.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 60. (2013) Tentang Silabus Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta.
Dashty Monireh. (2014). A Quick Look At Biochemistry : Lipid Metabolism. Journal Diabetes Metabolic. 5:1
Ghirardini, Beatrice. (2011). E-Learning Methodologies: A Guide for Designing and Developing E-Learning Courses. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Hadi, Nor. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Mahmudi, Ihwan. (2011). “CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikanâ€. Jurnal At- Ta’dib. Vol.6 (1)
Ahmad, S. (2014). Problematika Kurikulum 2013 dan Kepemimpinan Instruksional Kepala Sekolah. Jurnal Pencerahan, 8(2012), 98–108.
Astawa, I. B. M. (2019). Memahami Kewajiban Guru Dalam Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Pollit, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert . (2011). The Third Public Management Reform A comparative Analysis: New Public Managaement. Governance And The New Weberian State. Oxford University Press.
Rusman, dkk. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan. Komunikasi : Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali. Pers.
Slameto. (1991). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Stufflebeam, D. L. (2013). Toward A Science of Educational Evaluation. Englewood
Fuadi, A. S., & Anas, M. (2019). Implementasi Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Kurikulum 2013 Pendidikan Ekonomi. SEMDIKJAR 3, 316–324.
Wirawan. (2012). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumberdaya Manusia,Teori Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Hossein.Khoshgamd, Masumeh. 2011. “Application of CIPP model for evaluating the medical records education cour seat master of science level at Iranian medical sciences universitiesâ€. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol.15, hal: 3286– 3290
Junaidi, A. (2020). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Industri 4.0 untuk Mendukung Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka (S. S. Kusumawardani (ed.)). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
PermendikBud Nomor 3. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.