Developing Students’ Understanding In Learning Passive Voice Trough Cooperative Learning

Authors

  • Yuliana Friska Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/eduka.v7i1.17749

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see if cooperative learning improves students' grasp of passive voice in the first semester of accounting at Universitas Pamulang. This research is classified as Classroom Action Research (CAR), and it is used to discover and fix a problem related to students' comprehension of passive voice. The writer uses Hopkin's design in this Classroom Action Research. Meanwhile, the information gathered through the interview, questionnaire, observation, and test is being analyzed (pretest and posttest). Based on the outcomes of the study, it can be concluded that the use of cooperative learning in the teaching of passive voice is successful since the success criteria have been satisfied. The results of the posttest 2 reveal that 93.33 percent of the students, received a score of 70 or above. Furthermore, the results of the interview, observation, and questionnaire show a remarkable improvement. In conclusion, the results of the interview, observation, and questionnaire revealed that students' passive voice learning improved significantly after the cooperative learning approach was implemented in the teaching learning process.
Keywords: Students' Understanding; Passive Voice; Cooperative Learning.

 

References

Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi revisi).

Azar, B. S., & A Azar, D (2008). Fundamentals of English grammar. Workbook. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Betty Schrampfer Azhar. (2002). Understanding and Using English Grammar. New York. Longman.

Baratta. (2009). Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), 1406–1421.

Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities. A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education., 1995–2006.

Cowan, R. (2008). The Teacher’s Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dinsmore, J., & Wenger, K. (2006). Relationships in preservice teacher preparation: From cohorts to communities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 57–74.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989a). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. MN: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone (5th ed.). MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1968). Shorter articles and notes the interpretation of the passive voice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(1), 69–73.

Klingner et al. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 69–98.

Otheguy and Reid. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307.

Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Ascd.

Warriner, John. E. (1982). English Grammar and Composition. Harcout Brain Javanovich Publisher.

Additional Files

Published

15-02-2022

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.