ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN DARING PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI DI BAWAH NAUNGAN YAYASAN SASMITA JAYA (STUDI EMPIRIK PADA UNIVERSITAS PAMULANG DAN STMIK ERESHA)

Authors

  • UBAID AL FARUQ Universitas Pamulang
  • SAIFUL ANWAR Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/eduka.v5i2.8226

Abstract

Tujuan dari artikel riset ini yaitu untuk diperoleh hasil evaluasi secara deskriptif dari implementasi pembelajaran daring dikedua perguruan tinggi tersebut. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi, maka didapatkan hasil bahwa (1) Pembelajaran daring dikedua PT dilaksanakan sebanyak 40% pertemuan setiap MK, atau biasa disebut dengan blended learning serta digunakan pula sebagai suplemen atau penguatan kompetensi mahasiswa; (2) instrumental input berupa konten atau materi berupa modul digital, namun belum lengkap seluruh MK memiliki modul, untuk Unpam masih 11% dan untuk STMIK Eresha masih 1%, serta untuk materi lain berupa video pembelajaran, Unpam telah memiliki 132 video pembelajaran dan STMIK Eresha belum memiliki; (3) Learning Management System (LMS) yang digunakan dikedua PT berbasis moodle yang serta telah dilengkapi dengan menu aktivitas yang lengkap mulai dari tes awal dan akhir pertemuan, aktivitas belajar mandiri, interaksi antar mahasiswa serta dengan dosen, dan aktifitas penugasan terstruktur yang semua telah tertulis pada buku pedoman pembelajaran daring bagi dosen dan mahasiswa; (4) Pada proses pembelajaran daring belum menggunakan model dan strategi pembelajaran yang bervariatif sehingga belum memacu mahasiswa untuk bereksplorasi dan mendalami materi sesuai pokok bahasan dan tujuan pembelajarannya, interaksi masih terfokus pada moda asyncronous melalui forum diskusi pada LMS sehingga belum dapat menumbuhkan gagasan-gagasan baru pada mahasiswa.
Kata kunci: Pembelajaran; Daring; Perguruan Tinggi.

References

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand Online Education in the United States, 2009. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.

Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An Investigation of Epistemological and Social Dimensions of Teaching in Online Learning Environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/40214402

Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010

Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques : a handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2011.10.010

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, James, A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. https://doi.org/ED340272

Carliner, S. (2004). An Overview of Online Learning (Second). Massachusetts: HRD Press.

Chen, P.-S. D. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008

Clark, R. Colvin. (2002). Six Principles of Effective e-Learning : What Works and Why. The ELearning Developers Journal, 1–9.

Clark, Ruth C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and The Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines For Consumers and Designer of Multimedia Learning. Pfeiffer (Third Edit). Pfeiffer. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255971.

CNN Indonesia. (2019). BKPM Sebut Tangerang Selatan Calon Kuat KEK Pendidikan. Diakses pada tanggal 24 Mei 2019. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190311125441-532-376162/bkpm-sebut-tangerang-selatan-calon-kuat-kek-pendidikan.

Crawford-Ferre, Heather GlynnWiest, Lynda R. (2012). Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11–14.

Creswell, W. J. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers and Education, 125(May), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: the Online Student Engagement scale (OSE).(Section II: Faculty Attitudes and Student Engagement)(Report). Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 19(4), 143. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561.

Wand, Edwin, and Brown, Gerald W. (1957). Essentials of Educational Evaluation. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 59 – 109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

George D. Kuh, Ty M. Cruce, Rick Shoup, Jillian Kinzie, Robert M. Gonyea, Kuh, G. D., … Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0019

Goodyear Salmon, G., Spector, M., Steeples, C. i Tickner, S., P. (2001). Competences for online teaching. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49, 65–72.

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2015.09.005

Jacobson, D., Chapman, R., Ye, C., & Van Os, J. (2017). A Project-Based Approach to Executive Education. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 15 (1), 42 – 61. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12116.

Jauch Lawrence R. & Glueck William F. (1999). Manajemen Dan Strategis Kebijakan Perusahaan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Jones, Charles. 1994. Pengantar Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Kauffman, Roger & Thomas, Susan. (1980). Evaluation Without Fear. New York: New View Points.

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311

Lapsley, R., Kulik, B., Moody, R., & Arbaugh, B. (2008). Is Identical Really Identical? An Investigation of Equivalency Theory and Online Learning. The Journal of Educators Online, 5(1), 1–19.

Lee, J. S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491

Lyke, J., & Frank, M. (2012). Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(3), 245–250.

Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: Planning Learner Support and Activity Design. Gower Publishing Limiterd (Second Edi, Vol. 30). https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.103

Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2017). Quality Issues of Online Distance Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(June 2016), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.043

Mashaw, B. (2012). A Model for Measuring Effectiveness of an Online Course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(2), 189–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00340.x.

Mulyatiningsih, Endang. (2011). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1–10.

Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2009.06.011

Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Whitt, E. J. (2008). Effective instruction and college student persistence: Some new evidence. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(115), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.325

Perry, E. H., & Pilati, M. L. (2011). Online learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.472

Randolph, K. A., Fraser, M. W., & Orthner, D. K. (2004). Educational resilience among youth at risk. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(5), 747-767+844. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120034014

Shukor, N. A., Tasir, Z., Van der Meijden, H., & Harun, J. (2014). A Predictive Model to Evaluate Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2006), 4844–4853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1036

Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 623–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x

Suartama, Kadek, I & Tastra, Kadek, I.D. (2014). E-learninf Berbasis Moodle. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Sun, P.-C. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731

Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers and Education, 114, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012

Weber, J. M., & Lennon, R. (2007). Multi-Course Comparison of Traditional versus Web-based Course Delivery Systems. The Journal of Educators Online (Vol. 4).

Worthen, B.R & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York & London: Longman Inc.

Wuebker, M. P. (2013). Adult Learners: Improving Persistence and Performance in Online Learning Environments. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 39, 38–46.

Additional Files

Published

01-08-2020

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.