The Efforts to Fulfill Restorative Justice toward Notaries In the Criminal Justice System
Abstract
Notary authority is regulated in, namely making authentic deeds and other authorities as referred to in the Law on Notary Positions. Notaries who have carried out their duties in accordance with the legal corridor, in some cases are designated as suspects or defendants. The potential for criminalization may occur if an authentic deed that reflects the will of the interested parties to ensure their rights and obligations for the realization of certainty, order and legal protection for those concerned is deemed problematic. The steps taken by the Notary against the criminal snares he faces are to seek legal justice, although restorative justice should be put forward within the framework of the limitations that a Notary can be sentenced to.. The research approach model used is a normative juridical approach, namely an attempt to approach legal issues to be investigated with a normative legal nature. In this study, the problem raised is how to understand the essence of restorative justice that can be implemented in the notary world and how to fulfill restorative justice for notaries who are entangled in criminal cases. The results of this study are: the essence of restorative justice in the world of notary, making the perpetrators responsible for correcting mistakes, as well as providing opportunities for perpetrators to prove the capacity and quality of the Notary as a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds, bears the title officium nobile, in addition to preventive measures. through supervision and guidance by the Notary Supervisory Council so that between the implementation of the duties of the position an integral conformity is achieved between the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics.
Keywords: Restorative Justice, Notary, Criminal Justice System
References
References / Bibliograpy :
Books
Achjani Eva, Zulfa, Keadilan Restoratif, Depok: Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2009.
Ghofur Abdul, Ansori, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia Prespektif Hukum Dan Etika, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017.
Heriyanti, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris dalam kedudukannya sebagai pejabat umum terhadap akta otentik yang terindikasi tindak pidana. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka, tanpa tahun terbit.
Hiariej, Eddy. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
Irsan, Koesparmono dan Armansyah, Panduan memahami Hukum Pembuktian dalam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana. Bekasi: Gramata Publishing, 2019.
Ketut I, Oka Setiawan, Modul Metode Penulisan Dan Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Program Studi Kenotariatan Universitas Pancasila, 2019.
Lumban Tobing, G.H.S, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris (Notaris Reglement), Jakarta:: Erlangga, 1999.
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Semarang : B. P. Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.
Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana ̧Bandung: Alumni, 1984.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Mulyadi,Lilik, Hukum Acara Pidana Normatif, Teoretis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya, (Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2007
Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.
Sasangka Hari & Lily Rosita, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam pembuatan akta. Surabaya: CV. Mandar maju, 2011.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 1984.
Soemitro, Ronny Haditijo. Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Taufik Mohammad, Makarao, Suharsil, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.
Yahya M. Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.
Journal
Nugroho, Bastianto, “Peranan alat bukti dalam perkara pidana dalam putusan hakim menurut KUHAP,†Yuridika (Vol. 32, No. 1, Januari 2017).
Statute / Regulation
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
------------. Kitаb Undаng-Undаng Hukum Perdаtа (KUHPerdаtа).
------------. Undang-Undang tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), UU No. 8 Tahun 1981.
------------. Undаng-Undаng tentang Jabatan Notaris, UU No. 2 Tаhun 2014 tentаng perubahan atas UU No. 30 Tahun 2004.
Internet
Saiful Anam & Partners, “Pendekatan Perundang-undangan (Statute Approach) dalam Penelitian Hukum,â€<https://www.saplaw.top/pendekatan-perundang-undangan-statute-approach-dalam-penelitian-hukum/>.