Retroactive Principles in the Indonesia Singapore Extradition Treaty, What Impact It Has on the Eradication Of Corruption in Indonesia
Keywords:
Compensation, victim, illegal arrestAbstract
Djoko Prakoso, Upaya Hukum yang di atur dalam KUHAP, (Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia, 2006), p. 51.
Manggala, Ibrahim, “Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Salah Tangkap Dalam Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Universitas Lampung, (2018): p.3
Djoko Prakoso, Masalah Ganti Rugi Di Dalam KUHAP, Jakarta, 1998, PT Bina Aksara, p. 98 Wulandari, Sri, “Efektifitas Sistem Pembinaan Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terhadap Tujuan Pemidanaan”, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol.9, No.2 (2016): hlm 12
Asnawi, Habib Shulton. "Hak Asasi Manusia Islam dan Barat: Studi Kritik Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukuman Mati." Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2012): p. 109
Agustina, Lena, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Salah Tangkap”, Jurnal Online Mahasiswa, Vol. 1, No.2, 2014): p.6
Putra, I Gede, Adi, Pramana, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Perspektif Perundang-Undangan”, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Vol.9, No. 6, (2020): p.4
Azaria, Vida, “Keterkaitan Asas Presuption Of Inosense Didalam Pemberitaan Pers”, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Vol.7, No.2, (2018): hlm 5
Aiswarya, I Dewa, Bagus Dhanan, “Penerapan Prinsip Miranda Rule Aebagai Penjamin Hak Tersangka Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Vol.5, No.6, (2016): p. 1
Hatta, Mohammad, Sistem peradilan pidana terpadu, (Jakarta,Galang press Group, 2008), p.6
Muladi, Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, (Semarang, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1997), hlm 67.
Ali, Mahrus, “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Progresif; Alternatif dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana ”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, No.2 Vol.14, (2007): p.212
Mulyadi, Lilik, “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori Dan Praktik”, Jurnal Hukum Yustisia, Vol. 2, No.1, (2013): p. 7
Dzikriyah, Wajihatut, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembatalan Status Tersangka Dalam Putusan Pra Peradilan”, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Vol.4, No.3, (2015): p. 5
References
This study aims to determine and analyze the implementation of the provision of the rights of victims of illegal arrest who have served their sentences and to determine and analyze how the mechanism for returning the rights of victims of illegal arrest who have served their sentences. This research uses normative juridical research method with Statute Approach and Case Law Approach. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of legal protection for victims of illegal arrest is regulated in Law Number 8 of 1981 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and further arrangements are regulated in Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 concerning the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code. The form of compensation and rehabilitation for victims of illegal arrest is regulated in Article 95 and Article 97 of KUHAP on compensation and rehabilitation. However, with the regulation that the submission of compensation claims is given a time limit of 3 months calculated from the time of notification of the pretrial decision, this has not been able to provide or reflect protection and legal certainty for victims of illegal arrest. And in its implementation, it does not have coercive power, which in Government Regulation No. 92 of 2015 is not clear who must pay and there are no consequences if the compensation is not paid. So that there is a blurring of norms, where the norms governing victims of illegal arrest have not been able to provide protection to victims.
