The Implementation Of Restorative Justice In Petty Crimes As An Embodiment Of Pancasila Values

Authors

  • Apner Yorimen Tefu Pamulang University

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Pancasila, Reconciliation

Abstract

The implementation of restorative justice as a manifestation of Pancasila values is an effort to strengthen the foundation of justice that is inclusive and participatory. Restorative justice is an alternative approach in conflict resolution that emphasizes on restitution, reconciliation, and rebuilding of social relationships. This research employs a juridical-normative method with a literature approach to analyze the concept and implementation of restorative justice. The findings indicate that restorative justice strongly aligns with Pancasila values, such as mutual cooperation, social justice, and unity. Through this approach, communities can actively engage in conflict resolution processes, strengthen solidarity, and promote peace. Thus, the application of restorative justice not only reinforces the legal system but also strengthens unity and diversity within the framework of Pancasila values.

References

Andi Hamzah, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia dari retribusi ke reformasi, PT. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1996, h. 14.

Barda Nawawi Arief, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana,” in Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1996), 326–327.

D. Van Ness dan K.S. Heetderks, Restoring Justice, (Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company, 1997), h. 24.

Din Syamsudin, Pidato Kebangsaan Negara Pancasila: Baituna Jannatuna, dalam dalam Historisitas dan Spiritualitas Pancasila, Refleksi Peringatan 67 Tahun Hari Lahir Pancasila, Fraksi PDIP MPR RI, h. 88.

Dwi Kurniawan, “Pendekatan Restorative Justice Melalui Mediasi Penal Dalam Menangani Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan,” Idea Hukum 8, no. 1 (2022): 4.

E. Utrecht and Moh. Saleh Djindang (1), 1989, Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia [AnIntroduction to Indonesian Law], 11th print, Penerbit Ichtiar Baru dan Penerbit Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, h. 84.

H. Zehr, Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice, (Scottdale, Pennsylvania, Waterloo, Ontario: Herald Press, 1990), h. 181.

Henry F. Fradella David W. Neubauer, America’s Court and The Criminal Justice System, 1st ed. (Boston: Cengage Learning, 2019).

I Nyoman Nurjaya, Reorientasi Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Negara Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Hukum Progresif I, Kerjasama Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum dan Universitas Trisakti Jakarta, Semarang, 15 Desember 2007, h. 13.

I Nyoman Nurjaya, Reorientasi Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Negara Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Hukum Progresif I, Kerjasama Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum dan Universitas Trisakti Jakarta, Semarang, 15 Desember 2007, h. 13.

Ikwan Dldiri Budi Santosa and Akhmad Khisni, “Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Pidana (Studi Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Kasus Pembuatan Pupuk Oplosan/Palsu Yang Dilakukan Oleh CV. Indo Agritama Industri Jepara),” Jurnal Hukum: Khaira Ummah 12, no. 1 (2017): 17–26.

Kristian & Tanuwijaya, C. (2015). Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (RestorativeJustice) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, Vol.1, No.2, hlm.597-598.

L. Mirsky, “Albert Eglash and Creative Restitution”, Restorative Practices E-Forum, h. 2, look inside http://www.realjustice.org/library/eglash.html, accessed June 8, 2024.

Liam J. Leonard, “Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts?” Laws 11, no. 1 (2022): 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010014.

Look inside, https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=18254&menu=2, accessed June 9, 2024.

Marțian Iovan, “Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity,” Journal of Legal Studies 25, no. 39 (June 1, 2020): 57–68, https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2020-0004.

Mirza Sahputra, “Restorative Justice Sebagai Wujud Hukum Progresif Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.,” Transformasi Administrasi 12, no. 1 (2022): 90.

Niclas Carlsson Miguel Inzunza, “Crime Prevention in Colombia: A Pilot Study,” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–2.

Paulus Hadisuprapto, “Peradilan Restoratif: Model Peradilan Anak Indonesia Masa Datang”, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam Bidang Kriminologi pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 18 Februari 2006, h. 15-16.

Prayitno, K. P. 2012. Restorative Justice untuk Peradilan di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum in Concreto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12, No.3, h. 409.

Putra, I. K. C. 2017. Relevansi Konsep Negara Hukum Pancasila dengan Welfare State dalam Implementasinya dengan Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Jurnal), Vol. 6, No.1, h. 3.

Romli Atmasasmita, 2012, Teori Hukum Integratif: Rekonstruksi terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, h. 7.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2007, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir, Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum, Kompas, Jakarta.

Sjafruddin Prawiranegara, “Pancasila as the Sole Foundation‖ in Indonesia”, Indonesia Journal, Vol. 38, Oktober 1994, h. 74-83.

Soerjono Soekanto, Kesadaran Hukum Dan Kepatuhan Hukum (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1983), 58.

Yapiter Marpi et al., “Legal Effective of Putting ‘Business as Usual’ Clause in Agreements,” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10, no. 1 (2021): 58–70, https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.09.

Yoachim Agus Tridiatno,(2015), Keadilan Restoratif, Cahaya Atma Pustaka :Yogyakarta, h. 51-52.

Zaenal Arifin, “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Proses Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah,” Jurnal Hukum Responsif 5, no. 5 (2018): 54–63.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-19