Sociological Study for the Community of the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program
Keywords:
PTSL program, social benefits, social justice, social involvement, social stabilityAbstract
The Land and Natural Resources Use Program (PTSL) has a significant social impact on society. This program not only influences economic and environmental aspects, but also contributes to social dynamics at local and national levels. This study aims to discover and analyze the social benefits of implementing PTSL, focusing on increasing social justice, community participation and social stability. The main social benefits of PTSL include increased social justice through fairer access for local communities to natural resources. This program helps reduce inequalities in land ownership rights and access to natural resources, which are often sources of social conflict. In addition, PTSL encourages the community to participate actively in decision-making processes related to land and natural resource management. Through public consultation mechanisms and local empowerment, this program increases the community's ability to be involved in development and decision-making processes that directly impact their lives. Additionally, PTSL increases social stability by creating a more predictable legal environment and reducing the possibility of conflict over land ownership rights. By providing clear land certification and legally protected rights, this program reduces the social tensions that often arise due to uncertain land ownership. In the context of increasing urbanization and globalization, it is essential to understand that PTSL is concerned with natural resource management and strengthening social ties within society. By analyzing the social benefits of PTSL, this study provides important insights for inclusive and sustainable policy planning and reinforces the role of communities in sustainable development. The method used in this research analyzes the objects of norms issued by the government regarding the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program. This research uses a sociological approach which is presented in a descriptive manner through primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations, namely through Minister of Agrarian Regulation Number 6 of 2018 in conjunction with Presidential Instruction Number 2 of 2018 in conjunction with Government Regulation number 18 of 2018 and secondary legal materials through books. books, journals on the internet and seminar results. The results obtained are that there are no fair benefits in society, especially in terms of the significant costs that the community must incur and the lack of information obtained by the community. The conclusion is that the benefits obtained from the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program do not accommodate the community's interests as a whole.
References
Apeldoorn, Van. PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM. 3rd ed. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 2009.
Lebacqz, Karen. Teori-Teori Keadilan. Edited by Yudi Santoso. 5th ed. Indianapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1986.
Putusan, Analisis, Pengadilan Tata, Usaha Negara, D I Desa, Tanah Merah, Kabupaten Kupang, Yohanes Sepal, Sukardan Aloysius, and Agustinus Hedewata. “Petitum LawJournal.” PetitumLawJournal 1, no. 1 (2023): 177–88. file:///C:/Users/LENOVO/Documents/S3/REFERENSI PROCEEDING/IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MENTERI AGRARIA DAN TATA RUANGKEPALA BPN NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH SISTEMATIS LENGKAP (PTSL).pdf.
Rahmatullah, Indra. “Filsafat Hukum Sosiologis (Sosiological Jurisprudence); Konsep Dan Aktualisasinya Dalam Hukum Indonesia.” Adalah 5, no. 2 (2021): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i2.21394.
Nur Susilowati, Mulyani Djakaria, and Ida Nurlinda. “Analisis Prospek Pemberlakukan Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Publikasi Positif Dan Aspek Kepastian Hukum Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah.” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An 4, no. 1 (2020): 52–67. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i1.257.
Sutedi, Adrian. PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH Dan PENDAFTARANNYA. Edited by Ade Hairul Rahman. 1st ed. Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Syamsi, Ardiyan, Siti Aisyah, and Fatia Fatimah. “Implementasi Kebijakan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Di Kantor Pertanahan.” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 7, no. 3 (2024): 3240–47. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i3.4058.
Yubaidi, Ricco Survival, Mazliza Mohamad, and Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz. “Land Registration Acceleration in Indonesia: A Lesson-Learned Guideline From Land Registration Issues in Malaysia.” UUM Journal of Legal Studies 13, no. 1 (2022): 155–74. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.13.1.2022.10765.
Indonesia, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles, Law no. 5 LN of 1960 No. 104 No. 2043.
________, Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Concerning Land Registration, PP No. 10 LN of 1961, no. 28, TLN No. 2171.
________, Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Concerning Land Registration, PP No. 24 LN of 1997, No. 59 TLN No. 3696.
________, Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Concerning Land Registration, PP No. 18 LN of 2021, No. 245, TLN. No. 6573.
________, Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Concerning Direct System Land Registration, PP No. 6 LN of 2018, no. 112, TLN. No. 5038.
________, Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Concerning the Acceleration of Complete Systematic Land Registration in All Territories of the Republic of Indonesia, Presidential Instruction No. 2 of 2018.
__________, Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia concerning Procedures for Exams, Internships, Appointment and Extension of the Term of Office for Officials Making Land Deeds, ATR Ministerial Regulation No. 10 LN of 2017, no. 117, TLN. NO. 4432
