Granting Remission for Corruption Convicts Following the Supreme Court Decision Number 28P/HUK/2021: Human Rights Perspective
Keywords:
Remission, Corruption, extraordinary crimesAbstract
Corruption is not an ordinary crime but is one of the crimes included in extra ordinary crimes. Corruption is a human rights crime and is included in the category of crimes against humanity. The emergence of Constitutional Court Decision No. 28P/HUM/2021 has an impact on the aim of providing a deterrent effect to corruption convicts. With the enactment of regulations on granting remissions to corruption convicts, there are pros and cons in society. Corruption itself is an extra ordinary crime which cannot be equated with ordinary crimes. The enactment of Law no. 22 of 2022 concerning corrections provides freedom for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. The provision of remissions destroys people's hopes of realizing justice for society.
References
Ajarotni Nasution dkk, 2008, Tesaurus Bidang Hukum, pengayoman, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 2007, Terminologi Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
A. Mansyur Effendi, 2005, Perkembangan Dimensi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Proses Dinamika Penyusunan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, Ghalia Indonesia.
Brian Z. Tamahana, 2004, On the Rule of Law, History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge University Press.
Dwija Priyatno, 2008, Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Dwidja Priyatno, 2009, Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Evi Hartati, 2012, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Hilman Nur, Penghapusan Remisi Bagi Koruptor Dalam Perspektif UU Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 Tentang pemasyarakatan, Jurnal Mimbar Justitia, Vol 1 No. 2 Desember 2015.
Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyar Republik Indonesia, 2010, Panduan Pemasyarakatan Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Sekretaris Jenderal MPR RI, Jakarta.
Maria S.W. Sumardjono, 1989, Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian, t.p., Yogyakarta.
Muhammad Sajidin dkk, 2021, Formulasi Kebijakan Pemberian Remisi Narapidana Ditinjau Dari Aspek Politik Hukum, Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, Vol. 6, No. 2.
SF Marbun, 2004, Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004), hlm. 13; Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: UI Press, 1982), hlm. 52; dan Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto, Hukum, Konsep dan Metode, (Malang: Setara Press, 2013).
Suharsini Arikunto, Manajemen Penelitian, (Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 1993), hlm. 309. Lihat juga Erna Widodo dan Mukhtar, 2000, Konstruksi Ke Arah Penelitian Deskriptif, Avyrouz, Yogyakarta.
Umi Enggarsari dan Atet Sumanto, 2015, Pemberian remisi terhadap Narapidana Dilembaga Pemasyarakatan, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Vol.XX, No. 2 tahun 2015.
https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1632347/23-napi-korupsi-bebas-bersyarat-menkumham-pemerintahtak-bisa-melawan-putusan-ma Diakses pada 12-6-2023, 10.35 WIB.
