PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS SISWA MENGGUNAKAN METODE INTERAKTIF DENGAN METODE KONVENSIONAL (Studi Kasus Siswa Kelas I dan II SD Islam Al Azhar 15 dan SD Islam Nurfatahillah di Kecamatan Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan)

Authors

  • Lia Herlina
  • Umi Rusilowati
  • Rasmadi .

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v2i1.p%25p.321

Abstract

COMPARISON OF STUDENTS LEARN ENGLISH USING INTERACTIVE WITH CONVENTIONAL METHODS (A Case Study of Grade I and II SD Islam Al Azhar 15 and SD Islam Nurfatahillah in the district Pamulang, South Tangerang). The result shows that: from the result of interview and discussion shows that students’ interest in learning English is higher when using interactive CD method than the speech method, so this affected students’ learning achievement in both elementary schools. The statistical calculation of learning achievement of both elementary schools shows that the average score of students’ learning achievement at Al Azhar 15 Elementary School through speech method is 92.05 and its deviation standard is 5.89, while the average score of students’ learning achievement in experiment class through interactive method is 93.95 and its deviation standard is 4.97. The average score of the second grade of controlled class through speech method is 84.21 and its deviation standard is 4.08 while students’ learning achievement of experiment class is 92.29 and its deviation standard is 6.64. Meanwhile, the average score of second grade students’ learning achievement in controlled class at Nurfatahillah Elementary School through speech method is 86,59 and its deviation standard is 13,93, while the average score of students’ learning achievement in the experiment class is 91,24 and its deviation standard is 8,66. According to the statistical calculation, it can be seen that there is improvement on the average score of all classes at both elementary schools after using interactive method and interactive CD “ PLAYING WHILE STUDYING TOGETHER WITH BEBIâ€. The calculation of deviation standard which is inverse with the average score shows that the sameness of experiment classes’ test achievement of both Elementary Schools is better than 

Downloads

Published

2017-04-10

How to Cite

Herlina, L., Rusilowati, U., & ., R. (2017). PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS SISWA MENGGUNAKAN METODE INTERAKTIF DENGAN METODE KONVENSIONAL (Studi Kasus Siswa Kelas I dan II SD Islam Al Azhar 15 dan SD Islam Nurfatahillah di Kecamatan Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan). INOVASI, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v2i1.p%p.321

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015): INOVASI

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

INOVASI: journal of managenet have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities,  INOVASI: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.