Analysis of Employee Performance Evaluated Based on Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and Human Resources Scorecard (HRSC) PT Fastana Logistik Indonesia Divisi Transport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v10i2.p353-364.36115Keywords:
Performance, Human Resources Scorecard, Key Performance IndicatorAbstract
PT Fastana Logistik Indonesia (FLI) is a global supplier of transportation and logistics solutions. Performance measurement at PT Fastana Logistik Indonesia (FLI) uses KPI that aim to achieve company targets. PT Fastana Logistik Indonesia needs to evaluate not only with KPI but also with the HRSC method which emphasizes the human resource approach. This study aims to determine employee performance which is reviewed based on the Key Performance Indicator and Human Resources Scorecard. The research design uses a quantitative descriptive approach by collecting primary and secondary data from observations and questionnaires by measuring scores and interval scales. Quantitative data were then analyzed descriptively to draw conclusions. Based on the results of the study, it was shown that the performance of PT Fastana Logistik Indonesia in terms of the assessment of the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and Human Resources Scorecard (HRSC) aspects obtained results if the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) obtained a score of 85.81% on very good/accomplished criteria, the results The Human Resources Scorecard (HRSC) obtained a score of 218 with percent 82,57% on a very good scale.References
PT Fastana Logistik Indonesia .(2023). Profile PT Fastana Logistic Indonesia.Online : fli.co.id, 2023.
A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Afandi, P. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori, Konsep dan Indikator). Riau: Zanafa Publishing.
Aulia, Y. (2022). Klasifikasi Key Performance Indicator Kedalam Human Resources Scorecard (Studi Kasus Bidang SDM PT PLN (Persero).
Hasrun, Appin, V. (2020). Effect of Competences and Organization Commitmen Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Agama Provinsi Lampung.
Masram dan Mu’ah. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Sidoarjo : Zifatama Publiser.
Pratama, S. (2018). Mengukur Kinerja Dengan Human Resources Scorecard (Studi Pada PT BPRS Bhakti Sumekar, Sumenep).
Rosyid, A. (2017). Pengukuran Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Metode Human Resources Scorecard Dan AHP (Studi Kasus : PT Bella Citra Mandiri Sidoarjo).
Setiawan, H. (2019). Pengaruh Pelatihan dan Penempatan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Bank BJB Kantor Cabang Utama Bandung.
Sodikin, I. (2020). Perancangan Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan.
Warganegara, T. L. (2021).Analisis Kinerja Karyawan Berdasarkan Key Performance Indicator Dengan Menggunakan Metode Human Resources Scorecard (HRSC) Pada PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Tanjung Karang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
INOVASI: journal of managenet have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, INOVASI: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.