Peer to Peer Lending and Adoption: Analisis Bibliometrik

Authors

  • Ratnawaty Marginingsih Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Rida Prihatni Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Etty Gurendrawati Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v11i2.p577-588.44199

Keywords:

Peer-to-Peer Lending; Adoption; Financial Technology

Abstract

Dalam paper ini, metode analisis bibliometrik digunakan untuk menjelaskan perkembangan penelitian tentang Financial Technology yang berkaitan dengan Peer-to-Peer Lending. Metode ini mengukur dan menganalisis literatur secara kuantitatif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa penelitian tentang Peer-to-Peer Lending & Adoptoin  telah mengalami  perkembangan. Kata-kata seperti "Peer-to-Peer Lending" and "Fintech" and "Adoption" telah berkembang secara signifikan sejak tahun 2017. "Variabel Digital Inclusive Finance" dan "Artificial Intelligence" Tehadap Peer-to-Peer Lending & Adoptoin perlu dikembangkan dalam dalam penelitian ke depan dalam topik terkait  Financial Technology.

References

Abdullatif, Z., Purnaningsih, N., & Simanjuntak, M. (2020). Analysis of Willingness to Lend in Peer-To-Peer Lending Applications.

Abdullah, E. M. E., Rahman, A. A., & Rahim, R. A. (2018). Adoption of financial technology (Fintech) in mutual fund/unit trust investment among Malaysians: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Int. J. Eng. Technol, 7(2.29), 110.

Allen, F., Gu, X., & Jagtiani, J. (2022). Fintech, cryptocurrencies, and CBDC: Financial structural transformation in China. Journal of International Money and Finance, 124, 102625.

Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 7-25.

Aysan, A. F., & Nanaeva, Z. (2022). Fintech as a financial disruptor: A bibliometric analysis. FinTech, 1(4), 412-433.

Dömötör, B., Illés, F., & Ölvedi, T. (2023). Peer-to-peer lending: Legal loan sharking or altruistic investment? Analyzing platform investments from a credit risk perspective. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 86, 101801.

Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Huang, Y., Shin, H. S., & Zbinden, P. (2019). BigTech and the changing structure of financial intermediation. Economic policy, 34(100), 761-799.

Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of management information systems, 35(1), 220-265.

Havrylchyk, O., Mariotto, C., Rahim, T., & Verdier, M. (2021). The expansion of peer-to-peer lending. Review of Network Economics, 19(3), 145-187.

Kholidah, H., Hijriah, H. Y., Mawardi, I., Huda, N., Herianingrum, S., & Alkausar, B. (2022). A Bibliometric mapping of peer-to-peer lending research based on economic and business perspective. Heliyon, 8(11).

Kimani, D., Adams, K., Attah-Boakye, R., Ullah, S., Frecknall-Hughes, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: Whence, whither, wherefore and how?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120254.

Li, C., Khaliq, N., Chinove, L., Khaliq, U., & Oláh, J. (2023). Consumers’ Perception of Risk Facets Associated With Fintech Use: Evidence From Pakistan. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231200199.

Li, Y., Li, G., Tayi, G. K., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2019). Omni-channel retailing: Do offline retailers benefit from online reviews?. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 43-61.

Maskara, P. K., Kuvvet, E., & Chen, G. (2021). The role of P2P platforms in enhancing financial inclusion in the United States: An analysis of peer‐to‐peer lending across the rural–urban divide. Financial Management, 50(3), 747-774.

Meena, R. (2023). The Impact of Financial technology on Financial Services: A Comprehensive Analysis. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 8(3), 185–192.

Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.

Niu, B., Ren, J., Zhao, A., & Li, X. (2020). Lender trust on the P2P lending: Analysis based on sentiment analysis of comment text. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (8).

Patwardhan, A. (2018). Peer-to-peer lending. In Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion. Academic Press, Volume 1 (pp. 389-418).

Pizzi, S., Corbo, L., & Caputo, A. (2021). Fintech and SMEs sustainable business models: Reflections and considerations for a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125217.

Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100027.

Rabbani, M. R., Bashar, A., Hawaldar, I. T., Shaik, M., & Selim, M. (2022). What do we know about crowdfunding and P2P lending research? A bibliometric review and meta-analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15 (10), 451.

Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., López-Cabarcos, M. Á., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2021). Crowdlending: mapping the core literature and research frontiers. Review of Managerial Science, 1-31.

Sinha, S. (2024). Financial Technology (FINTEC) Innovation and Disruption. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(4), 6137–6161.

Suryono, R. R., Purwandari, B., & Budi, I. (2019). Peer to peer (P2P) lending problems and potential solutions: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 204-214.

Ölvedi, T. (2024). The new form of financial intermediation: key issues of peer-to-peer lending (Doctoral dissertation, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem).

Yang, R. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Loan Default Prediction in Peer-to-Peer Lending. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 94, 310-318.

Zhao, H., Anong, S. T., & Zhang, L. (2019). Understanding the impact of financial incentives on NFC mobile payment adoption: An experimental analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(5), 1296-1312.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

How to Cite

Marginingsih, R., Prihatni, R., & Gurendrawati, E. (2024). Peer to Peer Lending and Adoption: Analisis Bibliometrik. INOVASI, 11(2), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v11i2.p577-588.44199

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): Inovasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

INOVASI: journal of managenet have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities,  INOVASI: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.