Whistleblowing System dan Pencegahan Fraud: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/JABI.v4i3.y2021.p313-324Keywords:
Fraud, Prevention, Whistleblowing systemAbstract
This study aims to examine previous research literature on the effect of the whistleblowing system as a collaborative system on fraud prevention in a company or organization. This study uses a review of various literature on fraud prevention available in various databases. The results of this study indicate that the Whistleblowing System (WBS) is a form of illegal act reporting and supervision of an organization or company. There are 4 (four) important elements in the WBS, namely anonymity, independence, accessibility and follow-up. WBS is an effective mechanism in preventing fraud and in its implementation requires the company's commitment to protecting the whistleblower's personal data, a clear and responsible reporting mechanism and the process of evaluating and improving the system. Therefore, to support fraud prevention, companies are advised to implement an effective Whistleblowing system.
References
ACFE Indonesia Chapter. (2016). Survai Fraud Indonesia 2016.
ACFE Indonesia Chapter. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. In ACFE Indonesia Chapter.
Aghghaleh, S. F., Iskandar, T. M., & Mohamed, Z. M. (2014). Fraud Risk Factors of Fraud Triangle and the Likelihood of Fraud Occurrence: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1095
Agusyani, N. K. S., Sujana, E., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2016). Pengaruh Whistleblowing System dan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia terhadap Pencegahan Fraud pada Pengelolaan Keuangan Penerimaan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (Studi pada Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Buleleng). Jurnal Akuntansi Program S1, 6(3).
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination (Fourth Edi). Soth-Western Cengage Learning.
Amrizal. (2004). Pencegahan Dan Pendeteksian Kecurangan.
Aprilia. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101–132.
Badan Pengawas Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2008). Fraud Auditing. Pusdiklatwas BPKB.
Gaurina, N. P. M., Purnamawati, G. A., & Atmadja, A. T. (2017). Pengaruh persepsi karyawan mengenai perilaku etis dan whistleblowing system terhadap pencegahan fraud ( Studi Kasus Pada Bali Hai Cruises ). Jurusan Akuntansi Program S1, 8(2).
Holtfreter, K. (2008). Determinants of Fraud Losses in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/nml
Horwath, C. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough.
Huang, S. Y., Lin, C. C., Chiu, A. A., & Yen, D. C. (2016). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9
Husnawati, N., & Handajani, L. (2017). Accounting Fraud: Determinant, Moderation of Internal Control System And The Implication To Financial Accountability. E-Proceeding
International Conference and Call for Papers, 311–335.
Iqbal, M. (2010). Pengaruh tindakan pencegahan, pendeteksian dan audit investigatif terhadap upaya meminimalisasi kecurangan dalam laporan keuangan. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
Islamiyah, F., Made, A., & Sari, A. R. (2020). Pengaruh kompetensi aparatur desa, moralitas, sistem pengedalian internal, dan whistleblowing terhadap pencegahan fraud dalam pengelolaan dana desa di Kecamatan Wajak (Studi empiris pada Desa Sukoanyar, Desa Wajak, Desa Sukolilo, Desa Blayu dan Desa Patok. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 8(1), 1–13.
Jayanti, L. S. I. D., & Suardana, K. A. (2019). Pengaruh Kompetensi SDM, Moralitas, Whistleblowing dan SPI Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 29(3), 1117–1131.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Maulida, W. Y., & Bayunitri, B. I. (2021). The influence of whistleblowing system toward fraud prevention. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 2(4), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v2i4.177
Mulya, A., Rahmatika, D. N., & Kartikasari, M. D. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Competence, dan Arrogance) terhadap Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Statement pada Perusahaan Property, Real Estate, and Building Construction yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun . Jurnal Perpajakan Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 11(1), 11–25.
Nugroho, V. O. (2015). Pengaruh persepsi karyawan mengenai whistleblowing system terhadap pencegahan fraud dengan perilaku etis sebagai variabel intervening pada PT Pagilaran. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Omar, N., Rahman, R. A., Danbatta, B. L., & Sulaiman, S. (2014). Management Disclosure and Earnings Management Practices in Reducing the Implication Risk. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.014
Puryati, D., & Febriani, S. (2020). The Consequence of Whistleblowing System and Internal Control toward Fraud Prevention: A Study on Indonesian State Owned Enterprise. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 2(3), 35–48.
Putri, P. A. A., & Irwandi, S. A. (2016). The determinants of accounting fraud tendency. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v6i1.857
Sari, R., Su’un, M., & Nurwanah, A. (2021). Effect of internal control , whistleblowing role and data asymmetry against fraud prevention. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 2(1), 92–99.
Sawaka, I. G. N. H., & Ramantha, I. W. (2020). Fraud pentagon theory in detecting financial perception of financial reporting with good corporate governance as moderator variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n1.824
Shi, W., Connelly, B. L., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). External Corporate Governance and Financial Fraud: Cognitive Evaluation Theori Insight on Agency Theory Presciptions. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 1268–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Sofia, I. P. (2016). The Impact of Internal Control and Good Corporate Governance on Fraud Prevention. 2nd International Seminar on Accounting Society, January, 251–257.
Sudarmanto, E. (2020). Manajemen Risiko: Deteksi Dini Upaya Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 9(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v9i2.2506
Sujana, I. K., Suardikha, I. M. S., & Laksmi, P. S. P. (2020). Whistleblowing System, Competence, Morality, and Internal Control System Against Fraud Prevention on Village Financial Management in Denpasar. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(11), 2780. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i11.p06
Triyanto, D. N. (2019). Fraudulence Financial Statements Analysis using Pentagon Fraud Approach. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 2(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v2i2.22641
Wahyuni, E. S., & Nova, T. (2018). Analisis whistleblowing system dan kompetensi aparatur terhadap pencegahan fraud (Studi empiris pada Satuan Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Bengkalis). Jurnal Inovasi Dan Bisnis, 6, 189–194.
Wardana, I. G. A. K., Sujana, E., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2017). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Whistleblowing System Dan Moralitas Aparat Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Akuntansi Program S1, 8(2), 1–10.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)