Analisis Tantangan Baru Nilai Publik dan Akuntabilitas di Era Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/JABI.v8i1.y2025.p74-91Keywords:
public value; accountability, bibliometrics.Abstract
This study aims to investigate the development of publications on public value and accountability and find future prospects for the topic. Data were observed from Dimension AI database with the keywords "public value" AND "accountability". There are 377 documents consisting of articles, book chapters, conference papers, editorials, letters, notes, and reviews with a publication time span from 1976 to 2023. The research method is bibliometric analysis, using R biblioshiny and VosViewer software. The results found that the development of publications every year tends to increase, followed by an increase in author citations. The most productive journal and has the greatest impact is Public Money & Management and the most productive author and has the greatest impact is Giuseppe Grossi. Public Sector and Corporate Governance are topics that often appear. While the topic that is often discussed lately is transparency. Overall, these topics are predicted to be topics that will be discussed in the future.
References
Aditama, P. bintang, & Widowati, N. (2017). Analisis Kinerja Organisasi Pada Kantor Kecamatan Blora. Journal of Public and Management Review, 6(2), 1–12. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jppmr/article/view/15994
Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and trust in government evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 138, 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223.
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2016). Coordination of public sector organizations (pp. 3-12). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Capistrano, E. P. (2020). Determining e-Government trust: an information systems success model approach to the philippines’ government service insurance system (GSIS), the social security system (SSS), and the bureau of internal revenue (BIR). Philippine Management Review, 27, 57-78.
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178.
Chen, C. (2003). Mapping The Mind. In Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest For Knowledge Visualization. Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 51, Issue 08). https://doi.org/10.5860/Choice.51-4399.
Ebrahim, N.A., Salehi, H., Embi, M.A., Tanha, F.H., Golizadeh, H., Motahar, S.M. & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11).
Esposito, P., & Ricci, P. (2015). How to turn public (dis)value into new public value? Evidence from Italy. Public Money and Management, 35(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1027499.
Faulkner, N., & Kaufman, S. (2018). Avoiding theoretical stagnation: A systematic review and framework for measuring public value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 69-86.
Firmansyah, I., & Dermawan, W. D. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Accounting Using R Biblioshiny. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 10(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v10i2.16476
IFAC. (2004). 2004 IFAC HANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Scope of the Handbook CONTENTS. Business, April, 16–17.
Karunasena, K., & Deng, H. (2012). Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005
Kurniawan, R. C. (2017). Inovasi Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Pemerintah Daerah. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.794
Maryam, N. (2016). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalu Palyanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, VI(1), 1–18.
Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., & Mwakapesa, D. S. (2022). Understanding the drivers of the public value of e-government: Validation of a public value e-government adoption model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962615.
Milic, P., Veljkovi ´ c, N., and Stoimenov, L. (2018). “Semantic technologies in e- ´ government: Toward openness and transparency,” in Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. (Cham: Springer), 55–66. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_4.
Mouna, A., Nedra, B., & Khaireddine, M. (2020). International comparative evidence of e-government success and economic growth: technology adoption as an anti-corruption tool. Transforming Government: people, process and policy, 14(5), 713-736.
Patton, J. M. (1992). Accountability and Governmental Financial Reporting. Financial Accountability and Management, 8(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.1992.tb00436.x
Pavone, P., Ricci, P., & Calogero, M. (2024). New challenges for public value and accountability in the age of big data: a bibliometric analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(2), 396–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2022-1693
Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments? International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 350–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.524834
Quayle, A. (2021). Whistleblowing and accounting for the public interest: a call for new directions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(7), 1555–1580. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2020-4554.
Redden, J. (2018), “Democratic governance in an age of datafication: lessons from mapping government discourses and practices”, Big Data and Society, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 1-13.
Ricci, P. (2016), “Accountability”, in Farazmand, A. (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance, Springer International Publishing.
Roberts, J. (1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90027-C.
Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2016). Beyond nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the third sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 1515-1545.
Schillemans, T. (2016). Calibrating Public Sector Accountability: Translating experimental findings to public sector accountability. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1400–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1112423
Tavares, G. M., Sobral, F., & Wright, B. E. (2021). Commitment to Public Values, Charismatic Leadership Attributions, and Employee Turnover in Street-Level Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 542–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa057
Velayutham, S., & Perera, M. H. B. (2004). The influence of emotions and culture on accountability and governance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 4(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410521961
Wicaksono, K. W. (2015). Akuntabilitas Organisasi Sektor Publik. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 19(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.7523.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 R. Neneng Rina Andriani, Wildan Dwi Dermawan, Adil Ridlo Fadillah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.