PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, PROFITABILITAS, DAN LEVERAGE TERHADAP PENETAPAN TINGKAT DISKONTO DALAM ADOPSI METODE EKUITAS

Authors

  • Mei K Abdullah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/JABI.v3i2.y2020.p156-167

Keywords:

Firm Size, Profitability, Leverage, Discount Rate

Abstract

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of firm size, profitability, and leverage on the determination of the discount rate when the adoption of equity method. Firm size is measured by using natural logarithm of total company asset, Profitability is measured by Return on Equity (ROE), and Leverage is measured by Debt to Equity (DER). The discount rate is measured by the discount rate set by the company. The population in this study is a company listed Indonesia Stock Exchange during the year 2015-2016. The research data is obtained from the company's financial report on Bursa Effek Indonesia during the year 2015-2016. Pursuant to purposive sampling method, the sample obtained as many as 208 companies during 2015-2016. The hypothesis in this study was tested using multiple regression. The result of firm size analysis has negatif and not significant influence to the determination of discount rate and profitability and leverage analysis has positif and significant effect on the determination of discount rate at the time of adoption of equity method.

References

Asthana, S. (1999). Determinants of Funding Strategies and Actuarial Choices for Defined-Benefit Pension Plans.

Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (1):39-74.

Deegan, C. (2004). Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Sydney.

Fasshauer, J. D., M. Glaum, dan D. L. Street. (2008). Adoption of IAS 19R by Europe's premier listed companies: Corridor approach versus full recognition. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 17 (2):113-122.

Godwin, J. H., S. R. Golberg, dan J. E. Duchac. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of Factors Associated with Changes in Pension-Plan Interest-Rate Assumptions. Journal Of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 305-321

Januarti, I. 2004. Pendekatan Dan Kritik Teori Akuntansi Positif. Akuntansi dan Auditing 1:83-94.

Morais, A. (2010). Actuarial gains dan losses: the determinants of the accounting method. Pacific Accounting Review 22 (1):42-56.

Parker, Swanson dan Dugan. ( 2016). Management of Pension Discount Rate and Financial Health. Journal Of Pasific Economy Policy.

Robinson, T., H. V. Greuning, E. Henry, dan M. A. Braihahn. (2004). International Financial Statement Analysis. Canada: John Wiley & Shons, INc.

Riyanto, B. (2008). Dasar-dasar Pembelanjaan Perusahaan. Balai Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gajah Mada. Yogyakarta

Salah, I. B., dan H. Smaoui. (2014). Determinant of Actuarial Choices for Defined-Benefit Pension Plans: Canadian Evidence. International Review of Business Research Papers 10 (1):192-207.

Suwito, E., dan A. Herawaty. (2005). Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Tindakan Perataan Laba yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) VIII. Solo.

Watts, R. L., dan J. L. Zimmerman. (1978). Toward a Positive Theory of The Determination Of Accounting. The Accounting Review 3:112-132.

Zmijewski, M. E., dan R. L. Hagerman. (1981). An Income Strategy Approach to The Positive Theory Of Accounting Standard Setting/Choice. Accounting and Economic 3:129-149.

Elder.J Randal. et al. (2009). Auditing and Assurance Services. Singapore : Prentice Hall Pearson Education South Asia Ptd Ltd

Garrison H, Ray, Eric W. Noreen and Peter C. Brewer. (2008).

Akuntansi Manajerial. Buku 1. Edisi 11. Penerjemah Nuri Hinduan. Jakarta : Salemba Empat

Downloads

Published

2020-07-09