The Size of The Company is Moderating Earning Aggresiveness and Return on Asset on The Leverage

Authors

  • Melinda Malau Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/JABI.v3i3.y2020.p283-292

Keywords:

JABI

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze whether earning aggresiveness affects the leverage, return on asset affects the leverage, the size of the company can moderate the effect of earning aggresiveness on the leverage, the size of the company can moderate return on asset on the leverage. The sample used in the study was 500 observations using data from manufacturing companies for the period 2014-2018. The first model is without moderation variable, while the second model is with moderating variable. The results of the first model and second model show that earning aggressiveness has a significant positive effect on the leverage. Return on asset has a significant negative effect on the leverage. Size strengthens the effect of earnings aggressiveness on the leverage. Size strengthens the effect of return on asset on the leverage. In making investment decisions, investors must evaluate the quality of earnings reporting.

Author Biography

Melinda Malau, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta

Accounting, Finance, Audit

References

Ahmed, A., Billings, B., Morton, R., & Harris, M. (2002). The Role of Accounting Conservatism in Mitigating Bondholder-Shareholder Conflicts Over Dividend Policy and in Reducing Debt Costs. The Accounting Review, 77, 867–890.

Alipour, M., Mohammadi, M. F. S., & Derakhshan, H. (2015). Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study of Firms in Iran. International Journal of Law and Management, 57(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2013-0004

Alsaeed, K. (2006). The Association Between Firm-Spesific Characteristics and Disclosure: The Case of Saudi Arabia.

Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 476–496.

Altamuro, J., Beatty, A., & Weber, J. (2005). The Effects of Accelerated Revenue Recognition on Earnings Management and Earnings Informativeness: Evidence from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 101. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 373–401.

Bedard, J., & Johnstone, K. (2004). Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors’ Planning and Pricing Decisions. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 277–304.

Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., & Welker, M. (2003). The World Price of Earnings Opacity. Accounting Review (Vol. 78). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.641

Borja, D. V. H. (2015). Effect of Auditor Choice and Tenure on the Cost of Equity Capital of Selected Listed Firms in the Philippines. Philippine Management Review, 22, 1–20. Retrieved from http://ovcrd.upd.edu.ph/pmr/article/view/4519

Chadha, S., & Sharma, A. K. (2015). Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Evaluation From India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 12(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-08-2014-0051

Cooke, T. (1992). The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing and Industry Type On Disclosure In The Annual Reports of Japanese Listed Corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 22(87).

Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967–1010. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.414125

Francis, J., Nanda, D., & Olsson, P. (2008). Voluntary Disclosure, Earnings Quality, and Cost of Capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 53–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00267.x

Nikoomaram, H., Hamidreza, V. F., Fraydoon, R. R., Ghodratollah, T., & Peyman., A. (2011). Conceptual Model for Relationship Between Earning Quality and Cost of Capital. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9724–9733.

Singhvi, S., & Desai, H. (1971). An Empirical Analysis of the Quality of Corporate Financial Disclosure. The Accounting Review, 129–138.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-08