PERAN TATA KELOLA PERBANKAN SYARIAH TERHADAP RISIKO PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v8i1.3705Keywords:
tata kelola perbankan syariah, risiko perbankan syariah, perbankan syariahAbstract
The increased penetration of the Islamic banking market in Indonesia is one of the highest in ASIA. The enhancement in the market has an impact on increasing the risk complexity of Islamic banking business activities. Sharia banking risks need to be managed and controlled properly in order to prevent banking failures. Bank governance (corporate governance) is indicated as one of the things that plays an important role in determining the level of risk faced by banks. The purpose of this study is to examine whether good governance can reduce the risk of Islamic banking. This study uses the population of Islamic banking from 2014-2018. The samples obtained in this study are 58 Islamic banks. The results showed that good governance can reduce the banking risk. In addition, the testing using control variables showed that the greater the size of the banking system that is proxied by the total assets, the higher the risk received by banks both from credit risk to investment risk.
References
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 433-447
Cihak dan Hesse. (2010). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research, 38, 95-1
Ferdyant, Ferly, Ratna Anggraini ZR, dan Erika Takidah. (2014). Pengaruh Kualitas Penerapan Good Corporate Governance dan Risiko Pembiayaan terhadap Profitabilitas Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 1(2), 134-149.
Hartanto dan Purnamasari. (2019). he Analysis of Banking Governance in Indonesia: the Financial Services Authority Perspective. ACCRUALS, 3(1), 32-48.
International Monetary Fund. (2017). Insuring financial
stability in countries with Islamic banking. Retrieved from http:
//www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2017/02/21/
PP-Ensuring-Financial-Stability-in-Countries-with-Islamic-Banking
Kabir, M. N., Worthington, A., dan Gupta, R. (2015). Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 34, 327-353.
Misman, F. N. & Bhatti, I. (2010). Risks exposure in Islamic banks: A case study of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (BIMB). In Australian Centre for Financial Studies-Finsia Banking and Finance Conference.
Mutmainah, S. (2018. Tata Kelola Dan Risiko Bank Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2008-2016. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 14(2), 172-194.
Saputra, M. N. A. (2017). Kegiatan Usaha Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Masharif al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 2(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.