Hexagon Model: Financial Statement Fraud (Evidence Indonesian Health Company)

Authors

  • Hendy Satria STIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang
  • Rachmad Chartady STIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang, Kepulauan Riau
  • Zulfadhia Nurililah STIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang, Kepulauan Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v12i2.40442

Keywords:

Fraud, Fraud Hexagon Model, Financial Statement Fraud

Abstract

This research aims to determine the effect of the fraud hexagon model on financial statement fraud in healthcare companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019-2022 period. This research used a sample of 16 companies using a sampling technique, namely purposive sampling. The method used in this research is a quantitative descriptive method. The object of this research is a healthcare company listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Data collection techniques were carried out using documentation and literature study methods. The results of this research are based on the results of the t-test or partial test which shows that pressure, capability, and rationalization affects fraudulent financial statements. Opportunity, arrogance, and collusion do not affect financial statement fraud. The results of the f test or simultaneous test show that pressure, capability, opportunity, rationalization, arrogance, and collusion together simultaneously influence financial statement fraud. It can be concluded that the results of the coefficient of determination test with a McFadden R-squared value of 0.2313, which means that the variables pressure, capability, opportunity, rationalization, arrogance, and collusion influence financial statement fraud by 23.13% while the remaining 76.87% is influenced by other external variables from the research studied.

References

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1),17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Dewi, R., & Luthan, E. (2023). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dalam Perspektif Teori Fraud Hexagon pada Perusahaan Industri Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2022. Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 5(5), 2680–2696. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i5.5349

Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud Pentagon Dan Fraud Hexagon pada Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Ekbis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.14421/Ekbis.2018.2.1.1060

Ghozali, I. (2020). 25 Grand Theory. Yoga Pratama.

Hambrick & Mason (2023). Corporate Governance, Financial Stability Dan Ineffective Monitoring Terhadap Fraud in Annual Report. 2(1), 268–276.

Janah, N., Rachmawati, L., & Widaninggar, N. (2022). The Effect of Fraud Hexagon Model on Fraud Financial Statements in Companies in the Financial Sector. Assets : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Pajak, 6(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.30741/assets.v6i2.844

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.

Julia, J., & Yunita, A. (2022). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud in Detecting Fraud Financial Statements (Empirical Study on Financial Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017-2021). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(10), 2112–2124. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.10.23

Kismawadi, E. R., Al Muddatsir, U. D., & Hamid, A. (2020). Fraud pada Lembaga Keuangan dan Lembaga Non Keuangan (Cetakan Pe). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Lestari, U. P., & Jayanti, F. D. (2021). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Proaksi, 8(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.32534/jpk.v8i1.1491

Melati, D. P. A., Kirana, D. J., & Lastiningsih, N. (2020). Determinasi Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Fraud Diamond dan Family Ownership Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Ubhara, 2(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.31599/jmu.v2i2.762

Miftahul Jannah, V., Andreas, A., & Rasuli, M. (2021). Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Studi Akuntansi Manajemen Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.4.1.1-16

Novarina, D., & Triyanto, D. N. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan LQ 45 Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2020. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v10i2.7352

Nurhakim, A. L., & Harto, P. (2023). Fraud Pentagon: Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i02.p03

Octani, J., Dwiharyadi, A., & Djefris, D. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Selama Tahun 2017-2020. Jabei, 1(1), 36–49. https://akuntansi.pnp.ac.id/jabei

Pratiwi, A. S., Fanny Camelia Chanafi, N., & Satyabrata, P. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dan Kepemilikan Institusional Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14050

Priantara, D. (2023). Fraud Auditing & Investigation. Mitra Wacana Media.

Riyanti, A., & Theresia, T. (2021). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud on the Potential Fraud Financial Statements with the Audit Committee as a Moderating Variable. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(10), 2924–2933. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-36

Rizkiawan, M., & Subagio, S. (2022). Fraud Hexagon And Corporate Governance Analysis On The Potential Fraud In Financial Statements. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 269–282.

Sari, T. P., & Lestari, D. I. T. (2020). Analisis Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud : Prespektif Diamond Fraud Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Bisnis Dan perpajakan, 20(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v20i2.618

Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.32534/jpk.v8i1.1491

Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon : Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Listed Di BEI Tahun 2014-2016. 3(1953), 91–106.

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (1953). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Traingle And SAS No. 99. 99, 53–81.

Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Ministerial and Governmental Institutions in Indonesia: An Analysis Using Hexagon Theory. Economies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040086

Utami, E. R., & Pusparini, N. O. (2019). The Analysis Of Fraud Pentagon Theory And Financial Distress For Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting In Banking Sector In Indonesia (Empirical Study Of Listed Banking Companies On Indonesia Stock Exchange In 2012-2017). 102(Icaf), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaf-19.2019.10

Utami, R. R., Murni, Y., & Azizah, W. (2022). Pengaruh Financial Target, Ineffective Monitoring, Pergantian Auditor, dan Perubahan Direksi Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Widyakala: Journal of Pembangunan Jaya University, 9(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.36262/widyakala.v9i2.572

Wahyuni, W., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2017). Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v21i1.13

Downloads

Published

2024-07-18

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hendy Satria, Rachmad Chartady, Zulfadhia Nurililah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.