Hexagon Model: Financial Statement Fraud (Evidence Indonesian Health Company)
Hexagon Model
Keywords:
Fraud, Fraud Hexagon Model, Financial Statement FraudAbstract
ABSTRACT
This research aims to determine the effect of the fraud hexagon model on financial statement fraud in healthcare companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019-2022 period. This research used a sample of 16 companies using a sampling technique, namely purposive sampling. The method used in this research is a quantitative descriptive method. The object of this research is a healthcare company listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Data collection techniques were carried out using documentation and literature study methods. The results of this research are based on the results of the t-test or partial test which shows that pressure, capability, and rationalization affects fraudulent financial statements. Opportunity, arrogance, and collusion do not affect financial statement fraud. The results of the f test or simultaneous test show that pressure, capability, opportunity, rationalization, arrogance, and collusion together simultaneously influence financial statement fraud. It can be concluded that the results of the coefficient of determination test with a McFadden R-squared value of 0.2313, which means that the variables pressure, capability, opportunity, rationalization, arrogance, and collusion influence financial statement fraud by 23.13% while the remaining 76.87% is influenced by other external variables from the research studied.
Keywords: Fraud, Fraud Hexagon Model, Financial Statement Fraud
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Fraud hexagon model terhadap Financial Statement Fraud pada perusahaan health care yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2019-2022. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel sebanyak 16 perusahaan dengan menggunakan teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu purposive sampling. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Objek penelitian ini adalah perusahaan jasa kesehatan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian ini berdasarkan hasil uji t atau uji parsial yang menunjukkan bahwa tekanan, kapabilitas, dan rasionalisasi berpengaruh terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Peluang, arogansi, dan kolusi tidak berpengaruh terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Hasil uji f atau uji simultan menunjukkan bahwa tekanan, kapabilitas, peluang, rasionalisasi, arogansi, dan kolusi secara bersama-sama berpengaruh terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil uji koefisien determinasi dengan nilai McFadden R-squared sebesar 0,2313 yang berarti variabel tekanan, kapabilitas, peluang, rasionalisasi, arogansi, dan kolusi mempengaruhi kecurangan laporan keuangan sebesar 23,13% sedangkan sisanya 76,87% dipengaruhi oleh variabel eksternal lain dari penelitian yang diteliti.
Kata kunci: Fraud, Fraud Hexagon Model, Financial Statement Fraud
References
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1),17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
Dewi, R., & Luthan, E. (2023). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dalam Perspektif Teori Fraud Hexagon pada Perusahaan Industri Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2022. Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 5(5), 2680–2696. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i5.5349
Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud Pentagon Dan Fraud Hexagon pada Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Ekbis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.14421/Ekbis.2018.2.1.1060
Ghozali, I. (2020). 25 Grand Theory. Yoga Pratama.
Hambrick & Mason (2023). Corporate Governance, Financial Stability Dan Ineffective Monitoring Terhadap Fraud in Annual Report. 2(1), 268–276.
Janah, N., Rachmawati, L., & Widaninggar, N. (2022). The Effect of Fraud Hexagon Model on Fraud Financial Statements in Companies in the Financial Sector. Assets : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Pajak, 6(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.30741/assets.v6i2.844
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.
Julia, J., & Yunita, A. (2022). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud in Detecting Fraud Financial Statements (Empirical Study on Financial Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017-2021). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(10), 2112–2124. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.10.23
Kismawadi, E. R., Al Muddatsir, U. D., & Hamid, A. (2020). Fraud pada Lembaga Keuangan dan Lembaga Non Keuangan (Cetakan Pe). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Lestari, U. P., & Jayanti, F. D. (2021). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Proaksi, 8(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.32534/jpk.v8i1.1491
Melati, D. P. A., Kirana, D. J., & Lastiningsih, N. (2020). Determinasi Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Fraud Diamond dan Family Ownership Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Ubhara, 2(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.31599/jmu.v2i2.762
Miftahul Jannah, V., Andreas, A., & Rasuli, M. (2021). Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Studi Akuntansi Manajemen Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.4.1.1-16
Novarina, D., & Triyanto, D. N. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan LQ 45 Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2020. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v10i2.7352
Nurhakim, A. L., & Harto, P. (2023). Fraud Pentagon: Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i02.p03
Octani, J., Dwiharyadi, A., & Djefris, D. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Selama Tahun 2017-2020. Jabei, 1(1), 36–49. https://akuntansi.pnp.ac.id/jabei
Pratiwi, A. S., Fanny Camelia Chanafi, N., & Satyabrata, P. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dan Kepemilikan Institusional Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14050
Priantara, D. (2023). Fraud Auditing & Investigation. Mitra Wacana Media.
Riyanti, A., & Theresia, T. (2021). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud on the Potential Fraud Financial Statements with the Audit Committee as a Moderating Variable. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(10), 2924–2933. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-36
Rizkiawan, M., & Subagio, S. (2022). Fraud Hexagon And Corporate Governance Analysis On The Potential Fraud In Financial Statements. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 269–282.
Sari, T. P., & Lestari, D. I. T. (2020). Analisis Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud : Prespektif Diamond Fraud Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Bisnis Dan perpajakan, 20(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v20i2.618
Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.32534/jpk.v8i1.1491
Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon : Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Listed Di BEI Tahun 2014-2016. 3(1953), 91–106.
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (1953). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Traingle And SAS No. 99. 99, 53–81.
Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Ministerial and Governmental Institutions in Indonesia: An Analysis Using Hexagon Theory. Economies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040086
Utami, E. R., & Pusparini, N. O. (2019). The Analysis Of Fraud Pentagon Theory And Financial Distress For Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting In Banking Sector In Indonesia (Empirical Study Of Listed Banking Companies On Indonesia Stock Exchange In 2012-2017). 102(Icaf), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaf-19.2019.10
Utami, R. R., Murni, Y., & Azizah, W. (2022). Pengaruh Financial Target, Ineffective Monitoring, Pergantian Auditor, dan Perubahan Direksi Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Widyakala: Journal of Pembangunan Jaya University, 9(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.36262/widyakala.v9i2.572
Wahyuni, W., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2017). Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v21i1.13
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hendy Satria, Rachmad Chartady, Zulfadhia Nurililah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
