Analisis Perbandingan Fraud Pentagon dengan Beneish Ratio dalam Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Reporting dengan Opini Audit sebagai Variabel Moderating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v9i1.4399Abstract
ABSTRACT
Fraudulent Financial Reporting is a deliberate attempt by a company to deceive and mislead users of financial statements, especially investors and creditors, by presenting and manipulating the material value of financial statements. This study aims to determine how the auditor's opinion can moderate the comparative analysis of the pentagon fraud with the beneish ratio in the detection of fraudulent financial reporting. The type of data used in this study is comparative quantitative data. The data source in this study is secondary data. The population in this study are banking companies listed on the IDX. With a sample of 16 publicly traded companies engaged in financial and banking institutions and were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2017. The results of this study indicate that of 64 samples there were 12.5% which indicated that the financial statements had been manipulated. Auditor opinions can increase the influence of Financial Stability, external auditor quality, change in auditor, change of directors, days sales in receivables index, sales gross margin Index, Asset Quality Index, growth index, depreciation index, sales, and general administration expenses index, leverage index, total accrual to fraudulent financial reporting. Beneish Ratio affects Fraudulent Financial Reporting while Fraud Pentagon does not affect Fraudulent Financial Reporting
References
Annisya, M., Lindrianasari, & Asmaranti, Y. (2016). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 23(1), 72-89.
Aprilia. (2017). Analisa Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model pada Perusahaan yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal Akuntansi Riset, 6(1), 96-126.
Beneish, M. D. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24–36.
Hariri, Ayub Wijayanti, dan Srilucki W.. (2013). Predicitng Financial Statements Corporate Fraud: Beneish M-Score Model. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Financial. 5(2).
Loebbecke, J., M. Eining. and J. Willingham. (1989). Auditor's Experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature, and Detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 1(28).
Sekaran, U. (2006). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis, Terjemahan, Widyaningrum. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 1-12.
Sugiyono. (2007). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Supomo, B & Indriantoro, N. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Tarjo, & Herawati, N. (2015). Application of Beneish M-Score Models andData Mining to Detect Financial Fraud. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(2015), 924–930.
Tessa, C & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor Keuangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX. 1-12.
Widarti. (2015). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 13(2), 229 – -244.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.