PENGARUH KEADILAN ORGANISASI, PERSEPSI DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI DAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASI TERHADAP KONTRIBUSI KARYAWAN PENSIUN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v8i1.4655Keywords:
Organizational Fairness, Perceived Organizational Support, Organizatinal Commitment, Organizational Citizenship BehaviourAbstract
This study examined the effect of effect of organization fairness, perceived organization support and organization commitment to organizational citizenship behavior for company. The object of this research is a pension employee of PT Krakatau Steel, which is in the province of Banten, especially in Cilegon branch. 10 branches serve as a sample with 140 questionnaires distributed, but the questionnaire which can be processed as many as 100 questionnaires. Questions questionnaire measured with a scale of 1-5. Data were analyzed by using SEM (Structural Equation Model) through SmartPLS (Partial Least Square) 1:10 version. The results of this study expressed that hypotesis from organizational fairness, perceived organization support and organization commitment is positive effect and significant to organizational citizenship behaviour for company
References
Becker, J.U., Greve, G., Albers., S. (2009). The impact of technological and organizational implementation of CRM on customer acquisition, maintenance, and retention. Int. J. Res. Mark. 26 (3), 207–215.
Cohen - Carash, Y. & Spector, P.E. (2001).The Role of Justice in Organizations :A Meta Analysis. Journal Of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 278 – 321.
Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On The Dimensionality Of Organizational Justice : A Construct Validation Of Measure. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 386 – 400.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of management perspectives, 21(4), 34-48
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Ghozali, Imam. (2006) . “Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif Dengan Partial Least Square (PLS)â€. Undip: Semarang.
Hasibuan, M. R. (2001). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Pengungkapan Sosial (Social Disclosures) Dalam Laporan Tahunan Emitmen Di Bursa Efek Jakarta Dan Bursa Efek Surabaya (Doctoral dissertation, program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro).
Hasibuan, Malayu. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia:Pengertian Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. Jakarta: PT. Toko Gunung Agung.
Hasibuan, S.P. Malayu. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Dasar dan Kunci Keberhasilan. Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung.
Kasemsap, K. (2012). Factor Affecting Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Passanger Car Plant Employees in Thailand. Journal of Social, Humanities, and Arts Silpakorn University Vol. 12(2). Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University: Bangkok.
Kreitner, Robert dan Angele Kinicki. (2003). Pengantar Organisasi Buku 1. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Kuntjoro, H. Zainuddin Sri Drs, MPsi. (2002). Komitmen Organisasi. Jakarta.
Lavelle, J. J., Brockner, J., Konovsky, M. A., Price, K. H., Henley, A. B., Taneja, A., et al. (2009). Commitment, procedural fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior: A multifoci analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 337–357.
Luthans, Fred. (1995). Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill International, New York.
Mardiana, Tri. (2004). Pengaruh Karakteristik individu Karakteristik Pekerjaan Dan Pengalaman Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi (Studi Empiris Pada Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta). Telaah Bisnis, Nomor 2, 2004.
Marxen, DE (1996). The Big Six pengalaman. Sebuah account retrospektif oleh alumni. Akuntansi Horizons, 10 (2), 73-87.
Mathis, dan Jackson. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi pertama, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta : Salemba Empat.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.
Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351–357.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247
Nawawi, Hadari. (1998).Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial,Yogyakarta : Gadjah MadaUniversity Press.
Organ, D. W. (1988a). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, DW (1988a). Organisasi perilaku kewargaan: Sindrom prajurit yang baik. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, DW (1988b). Sebuah pernyataan kembali hipotesis kepuasan-kinerja. Jurnal Manajemen, 14, 547-557.
Organ, DW (1990). Dasar motivasi perilaku kewargaan organisasional. Di BM Staw & LL Cummings (Eds.). Penelitian dalam perilaku organisasi (Vol. 12, hlm 43-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Parker, R. J., & Kohlmeyer, J. M. III, (2005). Organizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 357–369.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Paine, J., & Bachrach, D. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York, NY.
Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York, NY.
Rhoades, Linda. & Eisenberger, Robert. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology. 87(4): 698-714.
Robbins, S. & Judge, T. (2008). Perilaku organisasi. (Terj. D. Angelica, R. Cahyani, dan A. Rosyid) Edisi 12. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. (Buku asli tahun 2007)
Setiadi. (2004). Manajemen Kinerja. Semarang: Graha Ilmu.
Thibaut, J. W. and Kelley, H. H. (1959) The social Psychology of Groups, New York: Wiley.
Triyanto, A. & Santosa, TEC. (2009). Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keinginan Keluar dan Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen Vol. 7 No. 4. Universitas Kristen Maranatha.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
