IMPLEMENTASI AKUNTANSI AGRIKULTUR PADA PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR PERTANIAN DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Ravi Choirul Anwar Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
  • Amrie Firmansyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v8i2.4676

Keywords:

agricultural accounting, agriculture sector, accounting standards

Abstract

This study aims to review the implementation of agricultural accounting in Indonesia Agricultural Sector Companies. The research method used in this study is a qualitative method using content analysis. The data taken as the object of study are all the company's 2016-2018 annual financial statements which are the periods before and after the effective effect of PSAK 69 and PSAK 16 on agricultural sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The objects are 14 companies. The results suggest that in the accounting treatment of biological assets and agricultural products, none of the companies implemented the early adoption of PSAK 69 (2015) and apply accounting treatment in accordance with PSAK 69 in 2018. Related to biological assets in the form of productive plants, almost all companies have applied accounting treatment in accordance with PSAK 16 (revised 2015). The effectiveness of PSAK 69 (2015) provides significant changes to the accounting treatment of biological assets owned by companies, especially related to agricultural products. The treatment has an impact by increasing the company's assets by recognizing agricultural products as biological assets that were not previously recognized and recorded by the company. Meanwhile, related to biological assets in the form of live animals and edible plants that had been previously recognized by the company, there was a change in measurement using fair value fewer costs to sell, thereby affecting fluctuations in the company's profit and loss. The entry into force of PSAK 69 (2015) also uniforms the recognition and measurement of biological assets by companies.

References

Argiles, M. J., Garcia-Blandon, J., & Monllau, T. (2011). Fair value versus historical cost-based valuation for predictability of financial information. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 14(2), 87-113.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2018). Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan II-2018 Tumbuh 5,27 Persen (https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2018/08/06/1521/ekonomi-indonesia-triwulan-ii-2018-tumbuh-5-27-persen, diakses pada 9 Desember 2018).

Bohusova, H., & Svoboda, P. (2016). Biological assets: in what way should be measured by smes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 62 – 69.

Detikfinance. 2009. Konvergensi IFRS Berlaku 2012.(https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-1138564/konvergensi-ifrs-berlaku-2012, diakses pada 12 Desember 2018.

Elad, C., & Herbohn, K. (2011). Implementing fair value accounting in the agricultural sector. Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.

Farida, I. (2013). Analisis perlakuan aset biologis berdasarkan IAS 41 pada PT Perkebunan Nusantara VII (Persero). Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 1-24.

Hastuti, D. (2017). Ekonomika Agribisnis. Makassar: Rumah Buku Carabaca.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2009). Dampak Konvergensi International Financia Reporting Standards (IFRS) terhadap Bisnis. (http://iaiglobal.or.id/v03/berita-kegiatan/detailarsip-92, diakses tanggal 15 Mei 2019.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2013). Laporan dari London-Malaysia: Revisi IAS 41 Susah Diaplikasikan. http://iaiglobal.or.id/v03/berita-kegiatan/detailarsip-574, diakses pada 12 Desember 2018.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2018). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan per Efektif 1 Januari 2018. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Julianto, Pramdia Arhando. (2017). Negara Agraris, Mengapa Harga Pangan di Indonesia Rawan Bergejolak. https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2017/02/19/163912926/negara.agraris.mengapa.harga.pangan.di.indonesia.rawan.bergejolak, diakses pada 9 Desember 2018.

Kieso, D.E, Weygandt, Jerry.J, & Warfield, Terry.D. (2017). Intermediate Accounting 3th Edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Listyawati, R., & Firmansyah, A. (2018). Evaluasi penerapan akuntansi aset biologis pada perusahaan sektor peternakan. Substansi, 2(1), 59-76.

Marta, M. F. (2017). Ironi Negeri Agraris dan Upaya Mereduksi Risiko Kredit Pangan.https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2017/01/30/063000426 /ironi.negeri.agraris.dan.upaya.mereduksi.risiko.kredit.pangan, diakses pada 9 Desember 2018.

National Geographic. Tanpa Tahun. Agriculture. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/agriculture, diakses tanggal 12 Mei 2019.

Redaksi Wartaekonomi Online. (2017). LIPI: Masalah Utama Petani Itu Akses Sumber Pembiayaan. https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read155075/lipi-masalah-utama-petani-itu-akses-ke-sumber-pembiayaan, diakses pada 9 Desember 2018.

Survei Angkatan Kerja Nasional (Sakernas). 2018. Penduduk 15 Tahun ke Atas yang Bekerja Menurut Lapangan Pekerjaan Utama 1986-2017. https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2009/04/16/970/penduduk-15-tahun-ke-atas-yang-bekerja-menurut-lapangan-pekerjaan-utama-1986---2018, diakses pada 9 Desember 2018.

Syafrezani, S. (2009). Manfaat Tumbuhan Bunga Penghias Pekarangan. Bandung: Titian Ilmu.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia, Nomor P.69/Menhut-II/2009 tentang Pedoman Pelaporan Keuangan Pemanfaatan Hutan Produksi dan Pengelolaan Hutan (DOLAPKEU-PHP2H).

Downloads

Published

2020-07-31