PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR INTERNAL TERHADAP PROFIT DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT (PDM) PADA BANK UMUM SYARIAH DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v8i2.4730Keywords:
PDPK, PPAP, BOPO, NPF, PDMAbstract
This study aims to analyze the factors that affect the Profit Distribution Management (PDM) using the variable Proportion of Third Party Funds (PDPK), Provision for Earning Asset Losses (PPAP), Operational Cost of Operating Income (BOPO) and Financing Risk (RP) at Commercial Banks. Sharia in Indonesia. The period of this research is the first quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2018. This type of research is descriptive analysis with quantitative research methods. The data source used is in the form of secondary data and obtained from the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in the form of Islamic Commercial Bank (BUS) quarterly financial reports consisting of 12 Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS) from 2016 to 2018. The data used from these financial reports are reports Profit Sharing Distribution, Financial Position Report, Income Statement, Earning Asset Quality Report and Financial Ratio. The sampling technique used in this research is purposive sampling technique. This study uses panel data regression analysis using Eviews software version 9.5 The results of this study indicate that the Proportion of Third Party Funds (PDPK), Allowance for Earning Asset Losses (PPAP), Operational Cost of Operating Income (BOPO) and Financing Risk (RP) simultaneously affect the Profit Distribution Management (PDM). Meanwhile, partially, the proportion of third party funds (PDPK), operational costs operating income (BOPO) and financing risk (RP) have a significant negative effect on Profit Distribution Management (PDM). Meanwhile, Provision for Earning Asset Losses (PPAP) has no effect on Profit Distribution Management (PDM).
References
Africano, R. D. (2017). Pengaruh Pembiayaan Bagi Hasil, Transparansi dan Kinerja Terhadap Profit Distribution Management (Studi Pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Periode 2012-2016) . Jurnal Akuntansi 2012210040 STIE MDP.
Defrinal Agus, Y. d. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profit Distribution Management Pada Bank Umum Syariah periode 2009-2012. Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Vol 5, No 1.
Farook, d. (2009). Profit Distribution Management Management By Islamic Banks: An Empirical Investigation. University of Illinois.
Ghazali, A. C. (2007). Teori Akuntansi. FUNDIP Semarang.
Ghozali, I. (2012). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 20. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate denganprogran IBM SPSS 21 Edisi 7. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Hasanah, U. (2015). Pengaruh Proporsi Dana Pihak Ketiga (PDPK), Penyisihan Penghapusan Aktiva Produktif (PPAP), Biaya Operasional Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO), Net Interest Margin (NIM), dan Tingkat Inflasi terhadap Profit Distribution Management (PDM). Skripsi S1 Unversitas Syarif Hidayatullah.
Hermanu, D. K. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profit Distribution Management Pada Bank Sayriah Di Indonesia Periode 2010-2014. Skripsi S1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Imawan, F. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruh Profit Distribution Management Pada Bank Syaiah di Indonsia Periode 2009-2012. Skripsi Universitas Lampung.
Karim, A. (2007). Bank Islam. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Jakarta.
Kartika, S. B. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profit Distribution Management Studi Empiris Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Periode 2009-2012. skripsi S1 universitas Diponegoro.
Masruroh, F. W. (2016). Analisis Profit Distributions Management (PDM) Bank Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2010-2014. Skripsi S1 Universitas Jember.
Masuroh, F. W. (2016). Analisis Profit Distribution Management (PDM) pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia periode 2010- 2014. Skripsi Universitas Jember.
Mirakhor, I. Z. (2007). An Introduction to Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice. Wiley Finance.
Mulyo, G. P. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profit Distribution Management Atas Simpanan Deposan Pada Bank Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2008-2011. Skripsi Universitas Diponegoro.
Mulyo, G. P. (2013). Determinan Profit Distribution Management Bank Syariah di Indonesia Periode 2008-2011. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi (IMANESI), Volume 1 Nomor 1 Halaman 1-7 Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Munirudin, T. R. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profit Distribution Management PADA BANK UMUM SYARIAH TAHUN 20122015. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), Vol 2. No. 3 Hal 140-153.
Prastika, I. A. (2018). Pengaruh Rasio Kesehatan Bank Terhadap Volume Pembiayaan Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia. Malia : Journal Of Islamic Banking and Finance , VOL. 2 No. 1 2654-8559 (E-ISSN)/2465-8577 (P-ISSN).
Prawoto, A. T. (2016). Analisis Regresi Dalam Peneitian Ekonomi & Bisnis : Dilengkapi Aplikasi SPSS & EVIEWS. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Rivai V, d. A. (2010). Islamic Banking : Sebuah Teori, Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Robert D Mason, d. (1996). Teknik Statistika: Untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi Ed. 9. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rosadi, Dedi (2012). Ekonometrika & Analisis Runtun Waktu Terapan dengan Ewiews. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset.
Saputra, A. (2014). Analisis Faktor Determinan Atas Profit Distribution Management Pada Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2011-2013. Skripsi UIN Sultan Syarif Kalsim Riau.
Siamat, D. (2002). Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Sugiyanto. (n.d.). Manajemen Pemasaran. Universitas Pamulang.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika Untuk Penelitian Edisis Kedua Puluh Delapan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Triyuwono, M. (2001). Memformulasikan Konsep Laba dalam Konteks Metafora Zakat. Akuntansi Syariah.
Ulfah. (2017). Determinan Profit Distribution Management Bank Syariah di Indonesia. Skiripsi S1 Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Widarjono, A. (2007). Ekonometrika Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: FE UII.
Yaya, d. (2009). Akuntansi Perbankan Syariah:Teori dan Praktek Kontemporer. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
www. Kontan. Co.id (https://www.google.com/amp/amp.kontan.co.id/news/makin-efisies-bopo-bank-syariah-terendah-selama-4-tahun-terakhir). Diakses Desember tahun 2018
Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No.17/19/DPUM tanggal 8 Juli 2015
UU No. 21 tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah
Surat Edaran BI No.3/30 DPNP tanggal 14 Desember 2001
SE Bank Indonesia Nomor 13/24/DPNP Tanggal 25 Oktober 2011
Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 13/13/PBI/2011 Pasal 40 Tentang Penyisihan Penghapusan Aktiva
Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 8/21/PBI/2006 Tentang Penilaian Kualitas Bank Umum Yang Melaksanakan Kegiatan Usaha Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, JIAUP: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.