Analisis Kelayakan Pabrik Sparkling Wine Nanas dengan Metode Charmat Berkapasitas 100.000 L/Tahun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jitk.v9i2.48504Keywords:
techno-economic analysis, economic feasibility, sparkling wine, pineapple wine, process cost modelAbstract
Indonesia is the largest pineapple producer globally, with production reaching 3.18 million metric tons. While most exports are processed products like canned pineapples, jam, and juice, pineapple sparkling wine offers a high-value alternative that aligns with the growing domestic and international wine markets. This study evaluates the feasibility of establishing a pineapple sparkling wine factory using the Charmat method, with a capacity of 100,000 L/year, in Buleleng, Bali. The research involves literature review, process flow diagram development, mass balance calculations, equipment design and costing, and comprehensive economic and feasibility analyses. Key economic parameters include Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Return on Investment (ROI), Payback Period (PBP), and Break Even Point (BEP). Results show an NPV of Rp 99,3 milliar, IRR of 28,67%, average of ROI of 47,34% ,and PBP of 4 years and 6 months. These findings demonstrate the project's economic viability and highlight its potential to contribute to the diversification of Indonesia's pineapple-based product industry. This study serves as a basis for further development and investment in pineapple sparkling wine production in Indonesia.
References
Ahoussi, L., Dje, K. M., Koffi, M. D., Yapo, O. B., & Kouadio, J. H. (2015). Valorization of pineapple produced in Benin: Production and evaluation of wine quality parameters. International Journal of Advance Research., 3(11): 830-840.
Bank Indonesia. (2024). Data Inflasi. https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/indikator/data-inflasi.aspx, diakses 16 Juni 2025.
Garrett, D.E. (2012). Chemical Engineering Economics. Springer Dordrecht, Dordrecht.
Grainer, K., & Tattersall, H. (2016). Wine: Production and Quality, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Hariyati, M. S., Annas, A., & Izaati, I. N. (2025). Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Anggur Purwogrape di Kecamatan Tegaldlimo Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Jurnal Ekonomi Managemen Akutansi dan Keuangan, 6(2): 1-13. 10.53697/emak.v6i2.2290
Heyward, I., Franca, P. S., Li, Z., & Rosa, E. P. S. (2016). Feasibility analysis on a winery facility. Welcome from ISERC 2016 Chairs, California, p. 496DUMMYA.
Jackson, R. S. (2008). Wine Science: Principles and Application, 3rd ed. Elsevier, Burlington.
Jasman, Prijambada, I., Hidayat, C., & Widianto, D. (2013). Ethanol Fermentation on Mixed Sugars Using Mixed Culture of Two Yeast Strains. Indonesian Journal of Biotechnol., 18(2): 116-122.
Kenkel, P., Holcomb, R. B., & Hill, A. (2006). Feasibility of a Co-operative Winery. Journal of Agribusiness., 26(2): 199-215.
Michel, L. (2020). Working capital management and profitability of wine firms in France: an empirical analysis International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business., 41: 368.
Peters, M. S., Timmerhaus, K. D., & West, R. E. (2003). Plant design and economics for chemical engineers (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Qi, N., Ma, L., Li, L., Gong, X., & Ye, J. (2017). Production and quality evaluation of pineapple fruit wine. In: 1st International Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Development (IGRED 2017). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 100: 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/100/1/012028
Rosária, M., Oliveira, M., Correia, A. C., & Jordão, A. M. (2022). Impact of Cross-Flow and Membrane Plate Filtrations under Winery-Scale Conditions on Phenolic Composition, Chromatic Characteristics and Sensory Profile of Different Red Wines. Process, 10(2): 284.
Safitri, V. R., & Kartiasih, F. (2019). Daya Saing dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ekspor Nanas Indonesia. Jurnal Hortikular Indonesia., 10(1): 63-73. https://doi.org/10.29244/jhi.10.1.63-73
Schwarzbichler, M., Steiner, C., & Turnheim, D. (2018). WACCs and Hurdle Rate. In: Financial Steering. Springer International, Switzerland, pp 21-37.
Sillanpää, M., Metsämuuronen, S., & Manttäri, M. (2015). Chapter 5 - Membranes. In: Natural Organic Matter in Water: Characterization and Treatment Methods. Butterworth-Heinemann, s.l., pp 113-157.
Signorini, G., & Lewis Ivey, M. L. (2023). Comparative Feasibility Analysis of Mechanized Equipment for Vineyard Operations. HortTechnology, 33(2): 239-246. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05147-22
Torquati, B., Giacche, G., & Venanzi, S. (2015). Economic Analysis of the Traditional Cultural Vineyard Landscapes in Italy. Journal of Rural Studies., 39: 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.013
Turton, R., & Shaeiwitz, J. A. (2017). Chemical Process Equipment Design. Prentice Hall, Hoboken.
Wagner, J. (2001). Membrane Filtration Handbook: Practical Tips and Hints, 2nd ed. Osmonics Inc.
World Population Review. (2024). Pineapple Production by Country. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/pineapple-production-by-country, diakses 28 September 2022.
Yadi, R., Kumar, R., Monandes, V., & Rahman, E. (2020). The downstream potential of pineapple derivative products. Proceeding International Conference on Science and Technology for Sustainable Industry. pp 51-58.
Zhu, Y., Su, Q., Jiao, J., Kelanne, N., Kortesniemi, M., Xu, X., Zhu, B., & Laaksonen, O. (2023). Exploring the sensory properties and preferences of fruit wines based on an online survey and partial projective mapping. Foods, 12(9), 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091844
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafael Farand, Asaf Sugih, Angela Kumalaputri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Kimia have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Kimia recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Kimia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
YOU ARE FREE TO:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
