Trust sebagai Mediasi Interaktivitas dan Personalisasi pada Sistem Rekomendasi Berbasis AI

Authors

  • Aah Sumiah Universitas Kuningan
  • Fahmi Yusuf Universitas Kuningan
  • Panji Novantara Universitas Kuningan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/jtsi.v8i4.58267

Keywords:

AI, Interactivity, Personalized, Recommender System, Trust

Abstract

AI-based recommender systems are widely implemented in e-commerce and digital platforms due to their ability to provide relevant and personalized recommendations. However, a key challenge in sustaining their adoption is establishing user trust, as limited trust can reduce continued usage intentions. This study investigates the effects of interactivity and personalization on intention to use, with trust as a mediating variable. A quantitative correlational approach was applied using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from 170 Universitas Kuningan students who actively used recommender-based applications such as Shopee, Tokopedia, Netflix, and Spotify. The findings indicate that interactivity (β = 0.059; p = 0.493) and personalization (β = 0.210; p = 0.053) do not directly influence intention to use. Nevertheless, both interactivity (β = 0.233; p = 0.003) and personalization (β = 0.571; p < 0.001) significantly affect trust. Furthermore, trust has a strong positive impact on intention to use (β = 0.525; p < 0.001) and significantly mediates the relationships between interactivity and personalization with intention to use. The model explains 55.4% of the variance in trust and 53.7% in intention to use. These results emphasize trust as a critical mechanism linking user experience to continued use of AI-based recommender systems.

References

Bach, T. A., Khan, A., Hallock, H., Beltrão, G., & Sousa, S. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(5), 1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2138826

Creswell, J. W., & David Creswell, J. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817277

Gotthardt, M., & Mezhuyev, V. (2022). Measuring the Success of Recommender Systems: A PLS-SEM Approach. IEEE Access, 10, 30610–30623. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3159652

Gulnara, B., Guldana, S., & Yerassyl, A. (2024). Application of Recommended Systems for E-commerce. Procedia Computer Science, 231, 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.212

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, & Marko Sarstedt. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Second Edition.

Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685

Madhuri, A., & Manchem, S. (2024). Exploring the Role of Personalization in E-commerce: Impacts on Consumer Trust and Purchase Intentions. European Economic Letters, 14(3), 907–919.

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Ou, C. X., Pavlou, P. A., & Davison, R. M. (2014). Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 38(1), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.10

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. MCB University Press, 9(5).

Qin, H., Zhu, Y., Jiang, Y., Luo, S., & Huang, C. (2024). Examining the impact of personalization and carefulness in AI-generated health advice: Trust, adoption, and insights in online healthcare consultations experiments. Technology in Society, 79, 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102726

Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2011). Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. In Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 1–35). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1

Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x

Thorson, K. S., & Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships Between Blogs as EWOM and Interactivity, Perceived Interactivity, and Parasocial Interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117

Tomass M Hultt, G., Joseph F. Hair Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, Marko Sarstedt, Nicholas P. Danks, & Soumya Ray. (2021). Classroom Companion: Business Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R AAWorkbook. http://www.

Valencia-Arias, A., Uribe-Bedoya, H., González-Ruiz, J. D., Santos, G. S., & Ramírez, E. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence and recommender systems in e-commerce. Trends and research agenda. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200435

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). A I S ssociation for nformation ystems Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. J Ournal, 17, 328–376.

Xu, X., Yao, Z., & Sun, Q. (2019). Social media environments effect on perceived interactivity: An empirical investigation from WeChat moments. Online Information Review, 43(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2016-0344

Yusuf, F. (2024). Information Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model for Social Media Adoption in Blended Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education Institutions in West Java, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Data Sciences, 5(2), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v5i2.195

Downloads

Published

2025-10-03

How to Cite

Aah Sumiah, Fahmi Yusuf, & Panji Novantara. (2025). Trust sebagai Mediasi Interaktivitas dan Personalisasi pada Sistem Rekomendasi Berbasis AI. Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi Dan Aplikasi, 8(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.32493/jtsi.v8i4.58267

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi

Section

Article

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Aah Sumiah, Fahmi Yusuf, Panji Novantara

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi have CC BY-NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC BY-NC or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License

YOU ARE FREE TO:

  • Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms