THE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND INTERNAL CONTROL ON VALUE FOR MONEY-BASED BUDGET PERFORMANCE
Abstract
This study aims to test empirically the effect of accountability, transparency and internal control on value for money based budget performance. The population in this study is the regional apparaturs organization in the Aru archipelago district government. The sample in this study is employees who work in the financial department of all regional apparaturs organizations in the local government of the Aru island district. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The research method used is quantitative research method. The data were obtained through questionnaires and measured using multiple regression analysis with processing through the SPSS 23 software. The results of this study indicate that accountability and transparency have a significant positive effect on value for money based budget performance while internal control has no significant effect on value for money based budget performance.
Keywords: Value For Money, Budget Performance, Accountability, Transparansy, Internal Control
References
Arifani, Cindy. 2018. The Effect of Accountability, Transparency and Oversight on Value for Money-based Budget Performance. Regional Journal of Accounting & Finance Vol. 13 Number 1 May 2018:68-82
Auditya, L., & Husaini, L. 2013. Analysis of the Effect of Accountability and Transparency of Regional Financial Management on Local Government Performance. Journal of Fairness Vol. III, p. 21-41.
Bastian, I. 2010. Public Sector Accounting. Yogyakarta: ERLANGGA.
Detasya, Rigian 2019. The Effect of Accountability, Transparency and Participation on Value for Money-Based Budget Performance. Thesis of PGRI Yogyakarta University.
Ghozali, I. 2017. Application of Multivariate Analysis with IBM SPSS Program 23. Semarang: Dipenogoro University Publishing Agency.
Hanifah, Nurul 2019. The Influence of Human Resource Quality, Accountability, Transparency and Internal Control on Value for Money-Based Budget Performance. University of Muhammadiyah Malang Thesis.
Loina Lalolo Krina P. 2003. Indicators & Measuring Instruments Principles of Accountability, Transparency & Participation. Jakarta: Secretariat of Good Public Governance of the National Development Planning Agency.
Mahmudi. 2010. Public Sector Performance Management. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
________. 2011. Public Sector Accounting. Yogyakarta: UII PRESS.
Mardiasmo. 2004. Public Sector Accounting. C.V Andi Offset.
________. 2009. Public Sector Accounting. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset
Nico Andrianto. 2007. Good e-Government: Transparency and Public Accountability Through e-Government. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Pasaribu, F. J. 2011. The effect of the presentation of SKPD financial reports and the accessibility of SKPD financial reports on the Transparency and Accountability of SKPD Financial Management. Thesis
Pujiono, Slamet, Dodik. 2016. The Effect of Internal Control System on Regional Financial Management and Local Government Performance. Bhishma Journal of Business and Management Vol. 10, No. 1 January 2016 Pg. 68 - 81
Raharja, G. P., Nyoman Trisna Herawati, & Purnawati, G. A. 2015. The Effect of Accountability, Community Participation and Internal Monitoring on Organizational Performance (At the Buleleng Regency Public Works Office). Evaluation of Drug Use in Pregnant Women at Hospital X Surakarta. Ganesha University of Education Thesis.
Setiyanningrum, I. 2017. The Effect of Accountability, Transparency, and Supervision on Budget Performance with the Concept of Value For Money in Regional Owned Enterprises (BUMD) in Yogyakarta. Profita Journal: Study of Accounting Science, 5 (3).
