Peran Living Law dalam Memperkuat Keberlakuan Hukum Positif di Tengah Heterogenitas Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/jurnalpkn.v13i1.58764Keywords:
Living law; hukum positif; Pluralisme hukumAbstract
Perkembangan hukum di Indonesia menunjukkan adanya ketegangan antara norma formal yang bersifat positif dan nilai-nilai sosial yang hidup di masyarakat. Kondisi tersebut menuntut adanya pemahaman baru tentang bagaimana living law dapat memperkuat legitimasi dan efektivitas hukum positif. Studi bertujuan untuk menelaah secara sistematis peran living law dalam konteks pluralisme hukum Indonesia yang majemuk. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan panduan PRISMA, melalui penelusuran 65 literatur dari basis data Google Scholar, Scopus, DOAJ, dan Sinta, yang kemudian diseleksi menjadi 32 artikel inti untuk dianalisis secara tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan empat temuan utama: (1) living law berfungsi sebagai refleksi nilai sosial dan budaya yang menjadi sumber legitimasi hukum; (2) terdapat ketegangan konseptual dan praktis antara hukum positif dan hukum adat; (3) integrasi nilai living law ke dalam kebijakan nasional dapat memperkuat keadilan substantif; dan (4) pluralisme hukum menghadirkan tantangan bagi harmonisasi sistem hukum modern. Kesimpulannya, pengakuan dan integrasi living law dalam sistem hukum nasional menjadi kunci untuk menciptakan hukum yang responsif, kontekstual, dan berkeadilan sosial di Indonesia.
References
Adi, B. P. (2025). Creating Synergy between Restorative Customary Law Values and the Retributive National Legal System. SHS Web of Conferences, 221, 03002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522103002
Aini, M. (2025). Hubungan Hukum dan Masyarakat. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(8), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i8.802
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia (Ed. 1 Cet. 2). Sinar Grafika.
Barkan, S. E. (2024). Law and society: An introduction (Third edition). Routledge.
Biryukov, S. (2024). Legal Pluralism as an Ideology and a Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 28(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.61205/S160565900029629-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Damanik, P. (2023). Strengthening Land Law Reforms through Legal Pluralism in Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.993
Ehrlich, E. (2017). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (W. L. Moll, Trans.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Febrianty, Y., Ishwara, A. S. S., Priambada, B. S., & Hulwanullah, H. (2023). The Limitations of Living Law in Indonesian Criminal Law Reform: An Effort to Realize Justice. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i2.1232
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal Pluralism: Concept, Theoretical Dialectics, and Its Existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 6(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566
Haryanti, I., & Suharto, R. B. (2021). The Juridical Overview of Customary Land Registration. Law Development Journal, 3(2), 272. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.2.272-282
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Lindsey, T. (Ed.). (2008). Indonesia, law and society (2nd ed). Federation Press; Distributed by ISEAS in Asia.
MD, M. M. (2009). Politik hukum di Indonesia (Ed. rev). Rajawali Pers.
Merry, S. E. (2010). Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. University of Chicago Press.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2001). Law & society in transition: Toward responsive law. Transaction Publishers.
Puaschunder, J. M. (2022). Behavioral International Law: Law-in-books vs. Law-in-action Resembling the Neoclassical Economics vs. Behavioral Economics Debate. Proceedings of the 28th Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (RAIS) Conference, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6945854
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum dalam jagat ketertiban: Bacaan mahasiswa program doktor ilmu hukum Universitas Diponegoro. UKI Press.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum: Paradigma, metode, dan dinamika masalahnya (Cet. 1). Elsam: HuMa.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Biem Triani Benjamin, Zainal Arifin Hoesein
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
