PROBLEMATIKA PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT UJI FORMIL DAN MATERIL TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Menutup akses terhadap keadilan; dan berpotensi revisi UU cipta kerja sifatnya persial. Putusan mahkamah konsitusi  terhadap  pegujian formil UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang cipta kerja terus menjadi polemik dan perbincangan publik. Dari 12 permohonan baik uji formil  dan/ atau uji materil, hanya 1 permohonan dikabulkan sebagaian putusan MK No.91/PUU-XVIII/2020 yang menyatakan UU cipta kerja Inkonstitusional bersyarat dengan menentukan berlakunya UU itu maksimal 2 tahun sejak diputus.

Kata Kunci : Putusan Mk, Uji formil dan Materil, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja

ABSTRACT

Contrary to legal considerations of the constitutional court which mentions the work copyright law as a strategic product; open space for multiple interpretations; closing access to justice; and potentially the revision of the work copyright law is partial. The decision of the constitutional court on the formal review of Law no. 11 of 2020 regarding job creation continues to be a polemic and public discussion. Of the 12 requests for both formal and/or material examinations, only 1 application was granted in part by the Constitutional Court's decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 which stated that the unconstitutional work copyright law was conditional by determining the validity of the law for a maximum of 2 years from the date it was decided.

Keyword : The Court's Decision, Formal and Material Test, Job Copyright Law