TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KONTEN PRANK PADA PLATFOM YOUTUBE SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Prank is a form of joke or joke that is deliberately made by someone with the intention of making fun of other people with the aim of creating a sense of satisfaction for the prank maker. There are various types of pranks which are generally made to then be made into personal or group content available on various social media such as YouTube. Prank content created by someone like a YouTuber (YouTube content creator) can be considered a criminal offense, even if a prank is a joke or a joke. This is because someone who becomes a victim of this prank may be harmed or their rights may be violated. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze YouTuber prank content which can be categorized as a crime under the Information and Electronic Transactions Act as well as the regulation regarding YouTuber prank content which is categorized as a crime in the Information and Electronic Transactions Act. The method used in this study is normative juridical using statutory and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials used is document study by examining primary and secondary legal materials. The method of analysis of legal materials is carried out in a normative juridical manner which is presented descriptively. Based on the results and discussion of this study, it was found that prank YouTuber content that can be categorized as a criminal offense under the Information and Electronic Transactions Act is prank content that contains content that violates decency, insults and/or defamation, and can cause hatred or hostilities of certain individuals and/or groups of people based on ethnicity, religion, race and intergroup (SARA). Then it was found that, arrangements regarding YouTuber prank content which are categorized as criminal acts in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law are regulated in Article 27 paragraphs (1) and (3) junto Article 45 paragraphs (1) and (3) and Article 28 paragraph (2) junto Article 45A paragraph (2).

Keywords: Prank Content; Criminal act; Youtubers