Illocutionary Act Used By Muniba Mazari In Inspirational And Motivational Video On Youtube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/piktorial.v2i2.7641Abstract
This study aimed explaining the pragmatic study of the follow-up, which is about the types of action, direct or indirect language and the context of speech used in Muniba Mazari in motivational videos on YouTube. It is expected to provide insight to the reader about types of illocutionnary act in order to improve pragmatic competence. The research was presented in a qualitative form because the data were presented in sentence form. The data were collected from Muniba Mazari’s speech. This research also applies the theory of J. R Searle (1979) on the follow-up to identify the types of follow-up, context, and meaning of sentences. Further, this study used the theory of Geogre Yule (1996) to know the language style directly or indirectly. The results of this study showed that there were 44 data found in the video of Muniba Mazari. They are: telling (3), claiming (3), sating (4), affirming (7), describing (9), suggesting (2), commanding (2), warning (3), vowing (3), promising (3), declaring (1), thanking (3), disliking (1). The most dominant in Muniba Mazari’s speech were representatives. It is because Muniba often reveals and informs about her life story to motivate the audience.
Keywords: pragmatic, Illocutionary act, stydirect speech act, indirect speech acts
References
Allan, K., & Jaszczolt, K. M. (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. United States: Cambridge University Press.
Aribowo, Y. S. (2013). The Illocutionary Acts Of Written Conversations In The Tenth Grade Senior High School Students' The Textbook: Look Ahead I. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University.
Austin, J. R. (1969). Speech acts An Essay In The Philosophy Of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bach, K. (2006). Speech Ats And Pragmatics. Cambride: Blackwell Press.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles : An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). Youtube Digital Media And Society Series. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. United States: Oxford University Press.
Kroeger, P. R. (2018). Analyzing meaning An Introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Krusdian, A. (2014). A Pragmatic Analysis Of Speech Acts Of The Main Character In State Of Play. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. United States: Longman Inc.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nadar, F. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Nurjannah. (2017). Effective interpersonal communication used by tourguides at fort rotterdam. makasar: state islamic university.
Schmidt, R. W., & Richards , J. (1983). Speech act and second language learning.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts ( An essay in the philosophy of language) Expressions, meaning, and speech acts. cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning Studies in The Theori Of Speech Acts. United Stated: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality An Essay In The Philosophy Of Mind. Unnited Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech Acts Theory And Pragmatics. Holland: D.Riedel Publishing Company.
Sholawat, L. F. (2017). An Analysis Types Of Speech Act Used By English Teacher in Englsih Teaching Learning Process at MTS AL- Wahhab Bago Kradenan in SAcademic Year 2016/2017. Surakarta: State Islamic Institute Of Surakarta.
Smith, P. W. (1991). Speech Act Theory, Discourse Structure and Indirect Speech Act. Leeds: Department of Philosophy.
Vanderstoep, S. W., & Jhonston, D. D. (2009). Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Frasisco: Jossey-Bass.
Vanderveken, D., & Kubo, S. (2001). Essay in Speech Act Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (2010). The Sudy Of Language. United States: Cambridge University Press, New York.
