Pendeteksian Potensi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon

Authors

  • Widya Lestari Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Sukartini Sukartini Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Nurul Fauzi Politeknik Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/skt.v7i2.34114

Keywords:

Fraud, fraud pentagon, fraudulent financial statement

Abstract

The aim of this research is to identify potential instances of financial statement fraud using the Fraud Pentagon theory, which includes the elements of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, and arrogance. Pressure is represented by variables such as financial stability, financial targets, and external pressures. Opportunity is measured through the proxy of ineffective monitoring. Rationalization is proxied by changes in auditors. Competence is reflected in director changes. Arrogance is assessed through the frequency and size of CEO pictures. The research population consists of transportation companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2020 and 2022. A purposive sampling method was employed, resulting in a sample of 30 companies. The statistical analysis used for this study involves multiple linear regression analysis using SmartPLS software. The research findings indicate that ineffective monitoring has a significant impact on financial statement fraud, whereas the other independent variables do not influence financial statement fraud.

References

ACFE. (2020). Report To The National On Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

AICPA. (2002). Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99, Consideration of Frauds in a Financial Statement Audit, Management Anti Fraud Programs and Controls Audit And Accounting Guide-Construction Contractors.

Adrea Fiolita Vella, & Sukartini. (2022). Business Students’ Perception of Academic Fraud and Fraud in the Workplace. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics (MJBE), 9(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v9i1.3767.

Apriliana, & Agustina. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntasi, 9(2), 154–165.

Bagayub, A., Zulfa, K., & Mustoffa, A. F. (2018). Analisis Elemen-Elemen Fraud Pentagon Sebagai Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal: Eknomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 2(1).

Cressey. (1953). Other People’s Money : a Study in the Social Psychologyof Embezzlement. Free Press.

Crowe. (2011). IIA Practice Guide: Fraud and Internal Audit. United States of America.

Damayani, F., Wahyudi, T., & Yuniartie, E. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Infrastruktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014 – 2016. AKUNTABILITAS: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Akuntansi, 11(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v11i2.8936.

Ghozali, I. (2008). Stuctural Equation Modeling, Metode, Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square. Badan Penerbit Undip.

Gudono. (2011). Analisis Data Multivariant. BPTE.

Haque, O., Buskafasa, E., Dwiharyadi, A., & Fauzi, N. (2022). The Effect of Internal Control and Organizational Culture on Accounting Fraud Tendencies With Accounting Information Systems As Moderating Variables. 2(2), 7–14. www.tribunnews.com

Hery. (2021). Analisi Laporan Keuangan. PT Grasindo.

Jao, R., Mardiana, A., Holly, A., & Chandra, E. (2020). Pengaruh Financial Target dan Financial Stability terhadap Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Management, 4(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.37531/yum.v11.76.

Kusumawati, & Putri. (2021). Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 6(1).

Mithaug. (2003). Implication of Current Theory: The Emergence of Causal Agency Theory. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Ningsih, E. N. Y. (2021). Pengaruh Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Terjadinya Fraudulent Financial Reporting dengan F-Score. Indonesian Accounting Literacy Journal, 2(1), 1–11.

Novitasari, A. R., & Chariri. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud dalam Perspektif Fraud Pentagon. Dipenogoro Journal of Accounting, 7(4), 1–15.

Ratnasari, & Solikhah. (2019). Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Statement: the Fraud Pentagon Theory Approach Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan:Pendekatan Fraud Pentagon Theory. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(2), 98–112.

Rezeki. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Model Dalam Memprediksi Keterjadian Fraudulent Financial Statement (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2018). Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 5(1), 189–197.

Septriyani, & Handayani. (2018). Mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan analisis fraud pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 11–23.

Situngkir, N. C., & Triyato, D. N. (2020). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using Fraud Score Model and Fraud Pentagon Theory: Empirical Study of Companies Listed in the L.Q. 45 Index. The Indonesian Journal Of Accounting Research, 23(3), 373–410.

Umar, H., Purba, R. B., Safaria, S., Mudiar, W., Harsono, & Karyaningsih. (2021). The New Strategy Combating Corruption. Medan.

Wicaksana, & Suryandari. (2019). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal RAK (Riset Akuntansi Keuangan), 4(1), 44–56.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01