DINAMIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA KONTEKS KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI KEUANGAN PARTAI POLITIK
Abstract
Abstract
Information disclosure has become a momentum for efforts to realize "good governance" and encourage a democratic system of government in Indonesia. With the enactment of UU KIP no 14 year 2008, the public is given access and rights to public information which are human rights and guaranteed by law. In addition, public information disclosure should encourage public participation. Political parties as public institutions, are no exception required to provide information services to the public who want to access all types of information regulated by law. However, based on ICW's report, how difficult it is for political parties to provide information requested by ICW. This article examines political culture, political communication strategies and public information disclosure in political parties. Political parties play an important role in the democratic process of a country. Given its role as political infrastructure in an effort to print cadres of state leaders in the executive and legislative branches of the political superstructure. The correlation between the two is very important in the realization of the principle of the rule of law based on the principles of democracy. In order to strengthen the implementation of democracy and an effective party system, institutional strengthening and improvement of the functions and roles of political parties are needed. So that it is necessary to provide party financial assistance sourced from public funding which is used to support political education activities and the operation of the political party secretariat.
Keywords: Party, Openness, Financial Information.
References
Andi Hamzah, 2012, Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional, Cetakan Kelima, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Budiman Tanuredjo, 2012, Pilkada Lansung: Menutar Jarum Jam Sejarah Mungkinkah?, dalam Konpress, Demokrasi Lokal Evaluasi Pemilukada Di Indonesia, Jakarta, Konstitusi Pers
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2013, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bak.
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2002, Bunga Rampai Kewajiban Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bak.
Dahlan Talib, 1993, Implementasi Sistem Ketatanegaraan Menurut UUD 1945, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Donal Fariz, Pengawasan Dana Politik, disampaikan Dalam Konsultasi Publik Kodifikasi Undang-Undang Pemilu.
Eddy O.S Hiariej,2012, Pemilukada Kini dan Masa Datang Persepektif Hukum Pidana, dalam Konpress, Demokrasi Lokal Evaluasi Pemilukada Di Indonesia, Jakarta, Konstitusi Pers.
Miriam Budiardjo, 2008, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno, 1991, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung.
----------------, 2010, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta: Kencana.
Ramlan Surbakti, 2015, Peta Permasalahan dalam Keuangan Politik di Indonesia, Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan, Jakarta.
Ramlan Surbakti, et al, 2011, Pengendalian Keuangan Partai Politik, Seri Demokrasi Elektoral Buku 10, Kemitraan bagi Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan, Jakarta.
Refly Harun, 2016, Pemilu Konstitusional Desain Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu Kini dan Ke Depan, Jakarta, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada
Rusadi Kantaprawira, 1996, Anjakan Analisis Politik dan Ketatanegaraan Atas Dasar Daur Parlemen, dalam Bagir Manan (Editor), Kedaulatan Rakyat, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Negara Hukum, Jakarta, Gaya Media Pratama
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2006, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta: Grafi Press.
Sidik Pramono, 2013, Pengendalian Keuangan Partai Politik, Jakarta: Kemitraan Bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar, 2010, Melawan Korupsi (Membaca Saldi Isra di Altar Demokrasi), dalam: Saldi Isra, Membangun Demokrasi Membongkar Korupsi, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
