METAFORA KONSEPTUAL HIDUP ADALAH PERJALANAN DALAM TETRALOGI LASKAR PELANGI KARYA ANDREA HIRATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/sasindo.v9i1.60-71Keywords:
Metafora Konseptual hidup adalah perjalanan, CMT, Tetralogi Laskar Pelangi, Andrea HirataAbstract
Setiap budaya memahami hidup dengan caranya sendiri dan setiap bahasa mempunyai cara tersendiri dalam mengungkapkan makna hidup secara metaforis. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan metafora konseptual kehidupan adalah perjalanan dalam Tetralogi Laskar Pelangi (selanjutnya ditulis TLP) karya Andrea Hirata. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan kerangka teoretis conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) dari Lakoff & Johnson (1980/2003) dalam ranah kognitif linguistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metafora konseptual kehidupan adalah perjalanan dalam TLP mempunyai domain sumber sebagai berikut: 1) arah hidup, 2) haluan hidup, 3) ekspedisi hidup, 4) jembatan, 5) labirin, 6) orientasi hidup, 7) tiket, dan 8) siklus. Dalam teori metafora kognitiv, analisis metafora memberikan jawaban atas pertanyaan tentang bagaimana kita membangun dunia dari pola-pola yang kita kenal. Melalui analisis metafora konseptual kehidupan adalah perjalanan, kita dapat memahami bagaimana masyarakat Melayu memaknai hidup seperti yang tertuang dalam TLP melalui karya Andrea Hirata, yaitu hidup haruslah dijalani sesuai dengan arah yang tepat, orientasi dan haluan yang benar, penuh petualangan (ekspedisi), berliku-liku (labirin, siklus) dan tidak selalu mudah (melalui jembatan, membeli tiket). Walaupun hidup tidak selalu mudah namun harus dijalani dengan sebaik-baiknya dengan berpedoman pada arahan yang tepat yang berlaku di masyarakat, hidup harus menghormati orangtua dan mengambil contoh dari perilaku baik orangtua, dan kita harus senantiasa berusaha hidup lebih baik dengan cara senantiasa memperbaiki diri sendiri.
Kata kunci: Metafora Konseptual hidup adalah perjalanan, CMT, Tetralogi Laskar Pelangi, Andrea Hirata
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Amber Boeynaems et.al. 2017. The Impact of Conventional and Novel Metaphors in News on Issue Viewpoint. International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 2861–2879
Antonio- José Silvestre-López. 2020. Conceptual Metaphor in Meditation Discourse: An Analysis of the Spiritual Perspective. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies Volume 20 (1), February 2020 http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2001-03 eISSN: 2550-2131 ISSN: 1675-802135
Benczes, Réka & Ságvári, Bence. 2018. Where metaphors really come from: Social factors as contextual influence in Hungarian teenagers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of life. Cognitive Linguistics. De Gruyter: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0139
Burmakova, Elena A. & I. Marugina, Nadezda. 2014. Cognitive Approach to Metaphor Translation in Literary Discourse. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 (2014 ) 527 – 533. DOI:10. 1016/j.sbspro. 2014 .10.180.
Culea, Mihaela& Suciu, Andreia-Irina. 2019. Understanding Shakespeare’s Language and Thought through the Use of Similes and Metaphors. Elm və İnnovativ Texnologiyalar Jurnalı Nömrə 8, 2019. 8-25 DOI: 10.5782/2616-4418.8.2019.8.
Denzin, Norman. K &. Lincoln, Yvonna. S. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage: USA
El-Sharif, Ahmad. 2016. A Theoretical Account on the Study of Metaphor in Didactic Discourse. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 100-112
Fludernik, Monika. 2011. Beyond Cognitive Metaphor Theory: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor.
Grygiel, Marcin. 2015. The Conceptual Metaphor BUISNESS IS WAR in Business English. Im Wirkungsfeld der kontrastiven and angewandten Linguistik. In the Field of Contrastive and Applied Linguistics.Vol. 6. Ed. Mariola Wierzbicka, and Lucyna Wille. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. 65–78.
Hamdi, Sondes 2016. A Cognitive Study of Happiness Metaphors in English, Tunisian Arabic and Spanish. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
I Made Rajeg. 2016. Metaphoric and Metonimic Conceptualization of Love in Indonesian. International Journal of Linguistics, Language and Culture (IJLLC). Vol 2 no 3, p 71-83. http:// dx. doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v2i3.213
Izgarjan, Aleksandra & Prodanović-Stankić, Diana. 2015. Approaches to Metaphor: Cognitive, Translation and Literature Studies Perspective. Faculty of Philosophy, Novi Sad. ISBN 978-86-6065-327-9. http://digitalna.ff.uns.ac.rs/sadrzaj/2015/978-86-6065-327-9
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2017. Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In: the Rouledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Ed: Zsόfia Demjen & Elene Semino. Oxon: Rouledge. p.1-27
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2018. Metaphor in media language and cognition: A perspective from conceptual metaphor theory. In Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, 2018, III (1), June 2018, p. 124-141. DOI: 10.2478/lart-2018-0004 ISSN 2453-8035
Lakoff, George.& Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lapasau, Merry. et al., 2020. Conceptual Metaphors in Modern Indonesian Literature and Their Implication in Language Learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 512. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Folklore, Language, Education and Exhibition (ICOFLEX 2019), p 235-240.
Naicker, Suren. 2019. An Analysis of Metaphorical Idioms in South African Indian English. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, Vol. 56, 2019, 1-12. doi: 10.5842/56-0-784. http://spilplus.journals.ac.za.
Oliynyk, Tetyana. 2014. Metaphor Translation Methods. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology. Vol. 4 No. 1, p. 123-126.
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol. Vol. 22 (1), 1-39. DOI:10.1080/10926480708336752
Smit, Talita C. 2010. Conceptual Metaphor and Comprehension in Business Writing. Per Linguam 26 (2):20-32l.
Yu, Ning. 2017. Life as Opera: A Cultural Metaphor in Chinese. In: F. Sharifian (ed.), Advances in Cultural Linguistics, Cultural Linguistics, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017. DOI 10.1007/ 978-981-10-4056-6_4. P. 65-85.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
