Pemanfaatan Blockchain untuk Mencatat Potensi Carbon Credit Berdasarkan Energi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya

Authors

  • Hanif Ramadhan Teknik Informatika S-2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten
  • Arya Adhyaksa Waskita Teknik Informatika S-2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten
  • Winarni Teknik Informatika S-2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten

Keywords:

Blockchain, PLTS, Carbon Credit, Verifikasi Energi, Smart Contract

Abstract

Global climate change driven by greenhouse gas emissions highlights the need for transparent, secure, and auditable renewable energy verification systems, particularly for converting clean energy into carbon credits. Solar power plants (PLTS) offer significant potential for emission reduction, yet conventional verification mechanisms remain constrained by slow processes, high costs, and vulnerability to data manipulation and double counting. This study proposes integrating a PLTS monitoring system with private blockchain technology and smart contracts to automate real-time energy-production verification. The proposed system, EnergyCreditUnit (ECU), records daily production data from logger devices as blockchain blocks secured by SHA-256 hashing and validates them through smart contracts on a Node.js runtime with RocksDB state storage. Using a 91-day dataset from PT XYZ (October-December 2020), the system achieved an average transaction latency of 122.32 ms, a throughput of 8.18 TPS, 100% hash consistency, 185.67 ms multi-peer block propagation, and a 100% voucher-transaction success rate. Three attack scenarios (block tampering, chain manipulation, and forged ECDSA signatures) were all detected. The results show that a private blockchain can serve as a viable, tamper-evident infrastructure for recording carbon-credit potential from solar energy production.

 

References

[1] M. Gillenwater and S. Seres, "The Clean Development Mechanism: a review of the first international offset programme," Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, vol. 1, no. 3–4, pp. 179–203, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/20430779.2011.647014.

[2] N. Sasaki, "Addressing scandals and greenwashing in carbon offset markets: A framework for reform," KeAi Communications Co., Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2025.06.003.

[3] A. Boumaiza, "A blockchain-centric P2P trading framework incorporating carbon and energy trades," Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 54, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101466.

[4] Y. He, S. Wang, Z. Zhou, K. Xiao, A. Xie, and B. Wu, "A Blockchain-based carbon emission security accounting scheme," Computer Networks, vol. 243, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110304.

[5] N. A. Alghanmi, N. A. Alghanmi, S. A. Alghanmi, M. Zhao, and F. K. Hussain, "Data-driven approach for selection of on-chain vs off-chain carbon credits data storage methods," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 310, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112871.

[6] S. De Angelis, L. Aniello, R. Baldoni, F. Lombardi, A. Margheri, and V. Sassone, "PBFT vs Proof-of-Authority: Applying the CAP Theorem to Permissioned Blockchain."

[7] C. Fan, C. Lin, H. Khazaei, and P. Musilek, "Performance Analysis of Hyperledger Besu in Private Blockchain," in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures (DAPPS), 2022, pp. 64–73, doi: 10.1109/DAPPS55202.2022.00016.

[8] F. Leal, A. E. Chis, and H. González-Vélez, "Performance Evaluation of Private Ethereum Networks," SN Computer Science, vol. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42979-020-00289-7.

[9] F. Vogelsteller and V. Buterin, "EIP-20: Token Standard," Ethereum Improvement Proposals.

[10] W. Entriken, D. Shirley, J. Evans, and N. Sachs, "EIP-721: Non-Fungible Token Standard," Ethereum Improvement Proposals.

[11] Hyperledger Foundation, "Hyperledger Caliper: Blockchain Performance Benchmark Framework," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hyperledger.github.io/caliper/

[12] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), "Secure Hash Standard," 2015, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4.

[13] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), "Digital Signature Standard (DSS)," Feb. 2023, doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.186-5.

[14] A. Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. De-Lucio, and M. Á. Sicilia, "Tokenized carbon credits in voluntary carbon markets: the case of KlimaDAO," Frontiers in Blockchain, vol. 7, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2024.1474540.

[15] G. Wood, "Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf

[16] D. P. Oyinloye, J. Sen Teh, and M. N. Yusoff, "Proof of Collaborative Contribution — A consensus protocol that incentivizes contribution with applications to distributed solar energy generation," Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, vol. 42, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2025.101641.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31