Standalone Report, Assurance Report, GRI Reporting Framework dan Kualitas Pengungkapan Sustainability Report

Authors

  • Huda Trihatmoko Universitas Airlangga
  • Sri Ningsih Universitas Airlangga
  • Muhammad Raihan Mubaraq Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/keberlanjutan.v5i2.y2020.p142-156

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a standalone report, assurance report, and GRI reporting framework on the quality of sustainability report disclosure in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. Measurement of the quality index of the sustainability report disclosure in identifying the item or content of the analysis uses the total quality score of the sustainability report disclosure for each company compared to the absolute maximum disclosure score. The standalone report, assurance report, and GRI reporting framework measurement uses a dummy: 1 if it owns the component and 0 if it does not. The sample of this research is 145 companies selected by purposive sampling method. The results of this study indicate that the standalone report and the assurance report do not affect. Still, the GRI reporting framework has a significant positive effect on the quality of sustainability report disclosure


ABSTRAK

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh standalone report, assurance report dan GRI reporting framework terhadap kualitas pengungkapan sustainability report pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2016-2018. Pengukuran indeks kualitas pengungkapan sustainability report dalam mengidentifikasi item atau isi analisis menggunakan total skor kualitas pengungkapan sustainability report untuk masing-masing perusahaan dibandingkan dengan total skor pengungkapan maksimum. Pengukuran standalone report, assurance report dan GRI reporting framework menggunakan dummy, yaitu 1 jika perusahaan memiliki komponen, dan 0 jika tidak. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 145 perusahaan yang dipilih dengan metode purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa standalone report dan assurance report tidak berpengaruh, namun GRI reporting framework berpengaruh positif terhadap kualitas pengungkapan sustainability report

References

Adams, C. A., & Evans, R. (2014). Accountability, Completeness, Credibility and the Audit Expectations Gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2004.su.00010

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Anugerah, E. G., Saraswati, E., & Andayani, W. (2018). Quality Of Disclosure And Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Practices In Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(3), 337–353.

Casey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2014). Understanding and Contributing to the Enigma of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Assurance in the United States. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(1), 97–130.

Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports: An international comparison. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021211223561

Cohen, J. R., & Simnett, R. (2015). CSR and Assurance Services: A Research Agenda. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 59–74.

Dewi, S. P., & Keni. (2016). Pengaruh Size, Profitabilitas, Leverage dan Umur Terhadap Pengungkapan Tanggungjawab Sosial Perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 12(1), 59–66.

Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006

Dilling, P. F. A. (2010). Sustainability Reporting In A Global Context: What Are The Characteristics Of Corporations That Provide High Quality Sustainability Reports An Empirical Analysis. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 9(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v9i1.505

Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00015

Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One Report - Integrated Reporting For A Sustainable Strategy. In Financial Executive.

Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1245-2

Greer, J., & Bruno, K. (1996). Green wash: The Reality Behind Corporate Environmentalism. In New York: Apex Press.

GRI. (2011). GRI Sustainability Reporting: How Valuable is the Journey?. Retrieved April 15, 2019 from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2008-2009.pdf

Habek, P. (2017). CSR reporting practices in Visegrad Group countries and the quality of disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12), 2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122322

Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001

Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T. (2017). Do Board’s Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1960

Hong, Y., & Andersen, M. L. (2011). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0921-y

Kanji, G. K., & Chopra, P. K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 2(12), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360903549808

Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2017). Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.153

Lindawati, A. S. L., & Puspita, M. E. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibilty: Implikasi Stakeholder dan Legitimacy Gap dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(1), 157–174.

Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure, Working Paper for the American Accounting Association Public Interest Section, USA. In Paper Presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference.

Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008

Maroun, W. (2019). Does external assurance contribute to higher quality integrated reports? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(4), 106670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.06.002

Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003

Nasution, R. M., & Adhariani, D. (2016). Simbolis Atau Substantif? Analisis Praktik Pelaporan Csr Dan Kualitas Pengungkapan (Symbolic Or Substantive? Analysis Of Csr Reporting Practices And The Quality Of Disclosure). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 23–51.

O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002

Patten, D. M., & Zhao, N. (2014). Standalone CSR Reporting by U.S. Retail Companies. Accounting Forum, 38(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.01.002

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas Pasal 40 Tahun 2007. Lembaran RI Tahun 2007 No. 4576. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2).

Rossi, A., & Tarquinio, L. (2017). An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 578–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2016-1408

Setiawan, S. R. D. (2019). HM Sampoerna Terima Penghargaan Lingkungan Tingkat Asia. Retrieved April 15, 2019 from https://money.kompas.com/read/2019/06/18/143725926/hm-sampoerna-terima-penghargaan-lingkungan-tingkat-asia.

Suastha, R. D. (2016). Riset Temukan Kualitas CSR Perusahaan Indonesia Rendah. Retrieved April 15, 2019 from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20160721074144-20-146030/riset-temukan-kualitas-csr-perusahaan-indonesia-rendah.

Utama, S. (2011). An evaluation of support infrastructures for corporate responsibility reporting in Indonesia. Asian Business and Management, 10(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2011.10

Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z

Wong, R., & Millington, A. (2014). Corporate social disclosures: A user perspective on assurance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(5), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2013-1389

Downloads

Published

2020-12-14

How to Cite

Trihatmoko, H., Ningsih, S., & Mubaraq, M. R. (2020). Standalone Report, Assurance Report, GRI Reporting Framework dan Kualitas Pengungkapan Sustainability Report. Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.32493/keberlanjutan.v5i2.y2020.p142-156