Sustainability reports disclosures: Siapakah stakeholder yang paling penting?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/keberlanjutan.v6i1.y2021.p53-62Keywords:
Analisis Konten, Sustainability Reports, Tipologi StakeholderAbstract
This study aims to analyze the most important stakeholders in Indonesian companies. One of the main reporting principles in GRI 101 is stakeholder inclusiveness. Content analysis was used to identify stakeholders in 38 companies that participated in the 2017 Sustainability Reporting Awards. The first step taken is coding the stakeholders. The next step is to record the symbols and interpret the results according to the typology of stakeholder Mitchell et al (1997). The findings of the study show that shareholders and government are the most important stakeholders, regardless of industry differences in the sample.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis stakeholder yang paling penting di perusahaan Indonesia. Salah satu prinsip pelaporan utama dalam GRI 101 adalah inklusivitas stakeholder. Analisis konten digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi stakeholder di 38 perusahaan yang mengikuti Sustainability Reporting Awards 2017. Langkah pertama yang dilakukan adalah melakukan coding terhadap stakeholder. Langkah selanjutnya adalah merekam simbol dan menafsirkan hasilnya sesuai kerangka typology stakeholder Mitchell et al (1997). Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemegang saham dan pemerintah menjadi pemangku kepentingan yang paling penting, terlepas dari perbedaan industri dalam sampel.
References
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665543
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
Freeman, E. R., Andrew C, W., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisitedâ€: A Reply. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0067
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: M.A. Pitman.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64. http://dare.uva.nl
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997a). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience : Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Source: The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. http://www.jstor.org/stable/259247%0Ahttp://about.jstor.org/terms
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997b). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Rob, G., Colin, D., Dave, O., Richard, E., & Simon, Z. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(3), 325–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710178106
Şener, İ., Varoğlu, A., & Karapolatgil, A. A. (2016). Sustainability Reports Disclosures: Who are the Most Salient Stakeholders? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.028
Steurer, R. (2006). Mapping stakeholder theory anew: From the “Stakeholder Theory of the Firm†to three perspectives on business-society relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.467
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/258788
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles publised in Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to :
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in Keberlanjutan : Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.