THE AUTHORITY AND THE POSITION OF THE CIVIL REGISTRATION OFFICE ON THE REQUEST FOR ADOPTION RECORDING OF CHILDREN ( A Case Study : Decision No.379 / Pdt.P / 2020 / PA.Tgrs)
Keywords:
Child, Addoption, Registration, Civil OfficerAbstract
Adoption of children has become part of the habits of the Muslim community in Indonesia and It has penetrated into practice through religious courts. Court rulings provide legal certainty for adopted children and for the child's parents, furthermore, it is necessary to record them at the civil registry office. This research was conducted to understand the authority of the Civil Registry Office for the determination of adoption of children based on the ruling of the religious court and the legal position of the Civil Registry Office regarding the rejection of the adoption of a child based on the decision of the religious court. The research applies empirical normative research methods, using literature to analyze the Tigaraksa Religious Court Decision No.379 / Pdt.P / 2020 / PA.Tgrs which granted the Petitioners' petition to adopt a child plus data from the Tangsel Disdukcapil and strengthened by interviews with applicant for adoption of children. The results showed that the TangSel Disdukcapil had the authority to register child adoptions and make marginal notes on the birth certificate register, but according to the domicile principle in Law No.24 of 2013, South Jakarta Disdukcapil had to have the applicant's population database and refusal of adoption by the Registry Office Civil because the Population Administration Law adheres to the principle of domicile according to the applicant's e-KTP.References
Ahmad Kamil dan H.M. Fauzan, Hukum Perlindungan dan Pengangkatan Anak di Indonesia, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2008.
Arliman, L. Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Anak Berkelanjutan. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol.19, No.2, 2017.
Dedi Ismatullah dan Beni Ahmad Saebani, Hukum Tata Negara Refleksi Kehidupan Ketatanegaraan di Negara Republik Indonesia, Bandung, Pustaka Setia, 2009.
Fahlevi, R. Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Anak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Lex Jurnalica, Vol 12, No. 3, 2015.
Fitriani, R. Peranan Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Dalam Melindungi dan Memenuhi Hak-Hak Anak, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Vol. 11, No.2, 2016.
Joko Widarto, Penerapan Asas Putusan Hakim Harus Dianggap Benar, Lex Jurnalica, Vol. 13 No. 1, Edisi April 2016, Hlm 78-79 (diakses tanggal 21 Desember 2020)
Krisna, L. A. Hukum Perlindungan Anak : Panduan Memahami Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum, Yogyakarta, Deepublish, 2018.
M. Yahya Harahap, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, cet.3, Jakarta, PT. Gramedia,1991.
Muderis Zaini, Adopsi Suatu Tinjauan dari Tiga Sistem Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1992.
Musthofa Sy., Pengangkatan Anak Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.
R. Soesilo, RIB/HIR dengan Penjelasan, Bogor, Politeia, 1985.
Sinaga, S. M., & Lubis, E. Z. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Kejahatan dalam Persidangan Anak. Jurnal Mercatoria, Vol 3 No.1, 2010.
Suwoto Mulyosudarmo, Kekuasaan dan Tanggung Jawab Presiden Republik Indonesia, Suatu Penelitian Segi-Segi Teoritik dan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Kekuasaan, Surabaya, Universitas Airlangga, 1990.
Wawancara dengan ABS, tanggal 15 November 2020
