Beyond Face-Saving: Politeness Strategies in Steve Harvey's Adult–Child Communication on Little Big Shots

Authors

  • Karmelia Putri Universitas Pamulang
  • Shinta Aziez Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/efn.v10i1.63195

Keywords:

children, communication, politeness strategy, respect, talk show

Abstract

Respectful communication plays a crucial role in children's cognitive, emotional, and social development. Although Brown and Levinson's politeness theory has been widely applied across various communicative contexts, previous studies have primarily examined interactions among adults and have largely focused on classifying politeness strategies rather than explaining their role in facilitating supportive communication with children. This study addresses this gap by investigating the politeness strategies employed by Steve Harvey in his interactions with child guests in the television talk show Little Big Shots. Specifically, the study examines the types of politeness strategies used and the factors influencing their selection within an adult–child communication context. Employing a qualitative content analysis design, the study analyzed seven purposively selected episodes featuring children aged three to six years with diverse talents. The data consisted of 57 dialogue exchanges, yielding 137 instances of politeness strategies because individual utterances could realize multiple strategies simultaneously. Data were analyzed using Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness framework following qualitative coding and thematic interpretation procedures. The findings reveal that all four politeness strategies were employed, with positive politeness emerging as the dominant strategy (56.2%), followed by bald on-record (24.1%), negative politeness (13.9%), and off-record (5.8%). Strategy selection was primarily influenced by payoff, relative power, and social distance. More importantly, the findings demonstrate that positive politeness functions not merely to mitigate face-threatening acts but also to encourage children's participation, strengthen self-confidence, reduce interpersonal distance, and create an emotionally supportive interactional environment. By integrating Brown and Levinson's politeness theory with Piaget's cognitive development theory and child-centered communication principles, this study extends the application of politeness theory to intergenerational communication. The findings contribute to developmental pragmatics by demonstrating that politeness strategies serve broader interactional functions, including emotional scaffolding and communicative support, while also offering practical insights for parents, educators, caregivers, and media practitioners seeking to foster respectful communication with children.

References

Ali, N. (2023). Politeness strategies in group discussion on controversial topics.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.

Hutahaean, D. T., & Girsang, A. F. F. (2021). An analysis of the politeness strategies utilized by Pesbukers in their variety show. Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra. https://doi.org/10.31294/w.v12i1

Irwanti, T. (2024). Analyzing positive politeness strategies on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon YouTube channel. Paradigma Lingua, 4(1). https://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/Paradigma/article/view/40553

Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia. (2025). Sistem Informasi Online Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak (SIMFONI PPA): Data kekerasan terhadap anak tahun 2024. https://kemenpppa.go.id

Kolucki, B., & Lemish, D. (2011). Communicating with children: Principles and practices to nurture, inspire, excite, educate and heal. UNICEF.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.

Muhajir. (2016). Peran keluarga dalam pembentukan karakter anak.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow.

Rabindran, D., & Madanagopal, D. (2020). Piaget's cognitive development theory and learning process. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(19), 2152–2155.

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). Academic Press.

Sihombing, R. (2022). Language acquisition and language development.

UNICEF. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Zubaedah, S., et al. (2024). Respectful communication and children's language development.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Karmelia Putri, & Aziez, S. (2026). Beyond Face-Saving: Politeness Strategies in Steve Harvey’s Adult–Child Communication on Little Big Shots. EUFONI: Journal of Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32493/efn.v10i1.63195