Pengujian Perangkat Lunak untuk Penulisan Hasil Belajar pada Pelajar SMK pada Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013

Penulis

  • Aries Saifudin Universitas Pamulang http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-633X
  • Teti Desyani Universitas Pamulang
  • Antomy Amsyah Universitas Pamulang
  • Abdul Jalil Universitas Pamulang
  • Luthtiansyah Luthtiansyah Universitas Pamulang
  • M. Virzy Ardiansyah Universitas Pamulang

Kata Kunci:

online report writing, Curriculum 2013, high school

Abstrak

This review meant to portray execution of learning results report composing of professional understudies on Educational plan 2013 utilizing the web-based report composing programming. This examination was elucidating exploratory review, which was essential for the exploration improvement by utilizing Sharma's model. Information gathered by perception and poll. Members in this review included 9 both public and private professional school in Exceptional Locale, including the VPs of educational plan, study hall educators, and data innovation experts from school members. The outcomes look that 56% of respondents expressed that the created programming has great quality and the leftover 44% of source person expressed that the product created has mid-range quality. A few respondents ideas for enhancements to the product, to be specific (1) the requirement for synchronization of the framework with the freshest unofficial laws (2) improvement of the culmination of data inside the framework; (3) the requirement for participation with the branch of instruction / other related organizations; (4) impediment the power of the understudies. In view of these ideas have been led further developing the framework with the goal that the product was prepared for using to help professional instructors in Indonesia to set up the learning results writes about Education plan  program 2013.

Referensi

Atkinson, L. (2001). Focus PHP programming using PHP to develop dynamic locales. London: Prentice Anteroom.

Bolboaca, S., Jäntschi, L., and Cadariu, A. (2003). PHP and MySQL web application reliant upon calfskin treater whitehouse standard. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Advances, 1(2), 37-52.

Bulger, B., Greenspan, J., and Divider, D. (2004). MySQL/PHP informational collection applications. Indianapolis: Wiley Conveying.

Buzzetto-More, N. A., and Alade, A. J. (2006). Best Practices in e-Evaluation. Journal of Information Advancement Guidance: Investigation, 5, 251-269.

Clarke-Midura, J., and Dede, C. (2010). Assessment, Advancement, and Change. Journal of Investigation on Advancement in Education, 42(3), 309-328.

Gilmore, W. J. (2008). Beginning PHP and MySQL from Fledgling to capable. New York: Springer.

Gosselin, D., Kokoska, D., and Eastebrooks, R. (2011). PHP programming with MySQL. Boston: Course Advancement.

Gronlund, N. E., and Linn, R. L. (1990). Assessment and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). New York: Collier Macmillan Distributers.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., and Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-layered framework for certifiable examination. Educational Development Creative work, 52(3), 67.

Hameed, G. (2013). Educators' perspectives about educational program change at essential level: A contextual investigation of a metropolitan young ladies elementary school. Global Diary of Scholarly Exploration and Reflection, 1(2), 26-36.

Harris, A. (2004). PHP 5/MySQL programming for the outright novices. Boston: Thomson.

Heinrich, E., Milne, J., and Moore, M. (2009). An examination concerning e-device use for developmental task evaluation status and suggestions. Instructive Innovation and Society, 12(4), 176–192.

Johnson, R. L., Penny, J. A., and Gordon, B. (2009). Assesing execution evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.

Kartowagiran, B., and Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP): Implementasi Asesmen Autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131.

Kearney, J., Fletcher, M., and Bartlett, B. (2002). PC based evaluation: Its utilization and impacts on understudy learning. In H.

M. M. Pavlova and D. Roebuck (Eds.), Introduced at the Learning in Innovation Schooling: Difficulties for the 21st Century. Park Illustrious: Gold Coast QLD.

Lerdorf, R., Tatroe, K., and MacIntyre. (2006). Programming PHP. Beijing: O'reilly.

Lombardi, M. M. (2008). Making the grade: The job of evaluation in valid learning. Retrieved from http://www.net.eduhouse.org.

Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 64 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Isi (2013).

Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian (2013).

Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Penilaian (2014).

Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi (2016).

Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 23 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian (2016).

Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1).

Nicol, D. (2008). Innovation upheld evaluation: An audit of examination.

Nitko, A. J., and Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Instructive Evaluation of Understudies (sixth ed.). New York: Pearson.

Nixon, R. (2015). Learning PHP, MySQL and JavaScript with Jquery, CSS and HTML. Sebastopol, CA: O'reilly.

Paszko, C., and Turner, E. (2001). Lab data the executives frameworks. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Pellegrino, J. W., and Quellmalz, E. S. (2010). Viewpoints on the Coordination of Innovation and Evaluation. Diary of Exploration on Innovation in Schooling, 43(2), 119–134 https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.1 0782565

Rennert-Ariev, P. (2005). A hypothetical model for the legitimate evaluation of educating. Functional Appraisal, Exploration and Assessment, 10. Retnawati, H. (2015a). Hambatan master matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(3).

Retnawati, H. (2015b). The examination of exactness scores on the paper and pencil testing versus somputer-based testing. The Turkish Internet based Diary of Instructive Innovation, 14(4), 135–142.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2022-05-30

Cara Mengutip

Saifudin, A., Desyani, T., Amsyah, A., Jalil, A., Luthtiansyah, L., & Ardiansyah, M. V. (2022). Pengujian Perangkat Lunak untuk Penulisan Hasil Belajar pada Pelajar SMK pada Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi Dan Aplikasi, 5(2), 128–131. Diambil dari https://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/JTSI/article/view/17648

Terbitan

Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi

Bagian

Article

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Aries Saifudin, Teti Desyani, Antomy Amsyah, Abdul Jalil, Luthtiansyah Luthtiansyah, M. Virzy Ardiansyah

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi have CC BY-NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC BY-NC or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License

YOU ARE FREE TO:

  • Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms