Mechanical Properties of ST 37 Manufactured by Gas Tungsten Arc Welding using Cannibal Consumable Manufacturing Filler
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/pjte.v9i1.41558Keywords:
Cannibal, Consumable, Filler, GTAWAbstract
In this paper, the macrostructure and mechanical properties of medium carbon steel with cannibal consumable filler by using the GTAW process have been investigated. The medium carbon steel (ST 37) plates with dimensions of 300 × 250 ×3 mm were used for welding and 2.5 mm of thickness for the filler. For welding parameters, current of 80 A was chosen and observed over the welded specimen. Welding was performed with single Vgroove butt Joint design, 30° bevel angle. Preparation of samples was done according to standard. To explore the optimum welding specimen, both tensile and bending tests were carried out. The result of the welding process with the current of 80A shows that the face part tends to be more embossed and the root part looks less embossed, there are parts that lack penetration. This causes a lack of weld strength due to incomplete penetration of the root part. The face section produces maximum and strong results, while at the root there are cracks that are almost broken. This is due to lack of fusion because the current is too small resulting in differences in weld strength between the face and root, which affects the bending test results. In the tensile test results, a fracture occurred in the weld metal in the form of a brittle fracture. This is caused by a lack of fusion and very minimal penetration of the filler metal into the weld groove. Based on the macro test analysis carried out, minimal root penetration or no penetration occurs, while the weld seam accumulates on the face. Based upon the present study it is not recommended that 80 A of welding current when GTAW process using canibal consumable filler. The current of 80A may need to improve to produce good welding.
References
[1] S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002. doi: 10.1002/0471434027.
[2] Kobelco Welding Handbook, 2020 Edition. Tokyo, Japan: Kobelco, 2020.
[3] J. Li, P. Zhou, H. Shi, and L. Wang, “Influence of filler metal on microstructure and properties of titanium/copper weld joint by GTAW weldments,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 833, p. 142508, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142508.
[4] H. Dong, X. Hao, and D. Deng, “Effect of Welding Heat Input on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of HSLA Steel Joint,” Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138–146, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13632-014-0130-z.
[5] Riswanda, A. D. Saragih, H. Kadir, and W. A. Irawan, “The Effect of GTAW Process Parameters for Dissimilar Metals Steel Armour and ASS 304L Using ER316L Filler on Mechanical Properties,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Experimental and Computational Mechanics in Engineering, Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-7495-5_64.
[6] Widharto, Welding Inspection, Edisi Asli. Jakarta, Indonesia: Mitra Wacana Media, 2013.
[7] Tarmizi, N. A. Hananda, and Irfan, “The Effect of Heat Input on Welding Combination of GTAW and SMAW SA537 Material on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure,” Kapal J. Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Kelaut., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 56–63, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.14710/kapal.v19i2.45028.
[8] S. Senthilkumar, S. Manivannan, R. Venkatesh, and M. Karthikeyan, “Influence of heat input on the mechanical characteristics, corrosion and microstructure of ASTM A36 steel welded by GTAW technique,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19708.
[9] J. Luijan, P. Surin, and K. Eidhed, “Investigation of ER308L and ER309L filler wires on dissimilar metals between carbon steel and 3CR12 ferritic stainless steel by GTAW through boiler fabrication in a sugar factory,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 126501, 2023, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad0eaa.
[10] I. O. for Standardization, “ISO 2553:2019, Welding and allied processes — Symbolic representation on drawings — Welded joints,” ISO Standard. ISO, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/71976.html
[11] A. International, “ASTM E8/E8M-09: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM Standard. ASTM International, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.astm.org/e0008_e0008m-09.html
[12] A. International, “ASTM E290-14: Standard Test Methods for Bend Testing of Material for Ductility,” ASTM Standard. ASTM International, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.astm.org/e0290-14.html
[13] A. International, “ASTM E407-99: Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys,” ASTM Standard. ASTM International, pp. 1–21, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://www.astm.org/e0407-99.html
[14] J. C. Lippold, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability, 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014. doi: 10.1002/9781118960332.
[15] N. Yurioka and H. Suzuki, “Determination of the Required Preheating Temperature in Steel Welding,” Weld. J., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 147s-154s.
[16] AWS, “AWS D1.1: Structural Welding Code – Steel,” AWS Standard. American National Standard, Florida, 2020.
[17] A. International, “Atlas of Microstructures of Industrial Alloys,” in Metals Handbook, vol. 7, 8th Edition, Ed., Ohio: American Society for Metals, 1972, pp. 139–140.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Albert Daniel Saragih, Riswanda, Prasetyo, Syahrul Dwi Nugraha, Tb. Moch Mario Al-Qashtalani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

