Evaluation of Surface Roughness of ST-60 Steel Material After Turning Process With Variation of Rotation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/pjte.v8i2.48933Keywords:
Surface Roughness, Spindle, Lathe Machine, Steel ST-60Abstract
It is necessary to select the right material, set the right machine, and determine the optimal machining parameters to obtain the best quality product. In the lathe process, surface roughness is a very important factor and is the main indicator in assessing the quality of the workpiece. Surface roughness can be used to evaluate whether the workpiece meets quality standards or not. The lower the surface roughness value on the workpiece, the better the quality. Conversely, a high surface roughness value can have a negative impact on the performance of the workpiece mating components, because it increases friction on the machine elements that are in contact with each other. This study aims to determine the effect of variations in spindle rotation, feed speed, and feed depth on the level of surface roughness resulting from the lathe machining process. In addition, this study also aims to identify which factors contribute the most to achieving optimal surface roughness in the lathe machining process. The samples to be used is steel ST-60 with a diameter of 22 mm and a length of 120 mm in the form of a solid cylinder. The lathe machine to be used is Conventional Milling Machine equipped with Rotary Table, Dividing Head and Machine Clamp. The samples was turned at cutting depth 0,5 mm with rotation 140, 280, 560, 1.120 Rpm and feeding length 5 cm. The experiment was conducted with three repetitions on each combination of variables to ensure the accuracy of the data obtained. Surface roughness measurements were carried out horizontally on the surface of the workpiece by taking three times the data on each workpiece. The results show that the smoothest surface is achieved at low rotation speed 140 Rpm with Ra value 1.140 µm and the highest value of Ra is 2.690 µm at 560 Rpm. This is due to at low speeds in the turning process helps reduce excess cutting forces, heat, tool wear, and vibration, resulting in smoother surfaces.
References
[1] T. Surdia and S. Saito, Pengetahuan Bahan Teknik. Jakarta Timur: Tim Balai Pustaka, 2013.
[2] H. Anrinal, Metalurgi Fisik. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2013.
[3] N. A. Sukarno, A. Legowo, A. Azis, L. A. Saputra, and S. Sunaryo, “Analisis Sifat Mekanik Baja ST 60 Setelah Proses Quenching dengan Variasi Waktu,” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. UNSIQ, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 196–202, 2023, doi: 10.32699/ppkm.v10i3.5440.
[4] H. Iriandoko, A. Akbar, and Y. S. Pramesti, “Pengaruh Heat Treament Baja ST 60 Terhadap Nilai Kekerasan Dengan Media Pendingin Asam Cuka,” Pros. SEMNAS INOTEK (Seminar Nas. Inov. Teknol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 200–204, 2020, doi: 10.29407/inotek.v4i2.144.
[5] Basori, A. Akbar, and Y. S. Pramesti, “Pengaruh Quenching Baja ST 60 dengan Media Hot Oil Terhadap Nilai Kekerasan,” Pros. SEMNAS INOTEK (Seminar Nas. Inov. Teknol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 273–278, 2020, doi: 10.29407/inotek.v4i3.99.
[6] I. Muchayar, D. Prumanto, D. Krisbianto, and A. Abbas, Metrologi Industri & Kontrol Kualitas. Banten: Yayasan Pendidikan dan Sosial Indonesia Maju, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://repository.unkris.ac.id/id/eprint/932/1/Buku.pdf
[7] S. Munadi, Dasar-dasar Metrologi Industri. Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan, 1988.
[8] M. C. Azhar, “Analisa Kekasaran Permukaan Benda Kerja dengan Variasi Jenis Material dan Pahat Potong,” Universitas Bengkulu, 2014.
[9] Mulyadi, “Analisa Pengaruh Putaran Spindel dan Kecepatan Makan Terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Baja SCM 4 pada Proses Milling,” Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, 2009.
[10] Budiana, F. Nakul, N. Wivanius, B. Sugandi, and R. Yolanda, “Analisis Kekasaran Permukaan Besi ASTM36 dengan menggunakan Surftest dan Image "“J,” Journal of Applied Electrical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 49–54, Dec. 31, 2020. doi: 10.30871/jaee.v4i2.2747.
[11] Karmin, M. Ginting, and M. Yunus, “Analisa Kekasaran Permukaan Hasil Proses Pengampelasan terhadap Logam dengan Perbedaan Kekerasan,” AUSTENIT, vol. 5, no. 2. pp. 1–7, Oct. 30, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/austenit/article/view/805
[12] A. Mufarrih, H. Istiqlaliyah, and M. Z. Fanani, “Surface Roughness Analysis in Turning of AISI 1045 Steel with Anova and Scheffe Test,” J. Tek. Mesin, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 67–72, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.21063/jtm.2018.v8.i2.67-72.
[13] Widarto, Teknik Pemesinan. Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2008.
[14] E. Yogaswara, Teknik Pemesinan Bubut. Bandung: CV. Armico, 2016.
[15] A. W. Hashmi, H. S. Mali, A. Meena, M. F. Hashmi, and N. D. Bokde, “Surface Characteristics Measurement Using Computer Vision: A Review,” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 135, no. 2. pp. 917–1005, 2023. doi: 10.32604/cmes.2023.021223.
[16] S. Zeng and D. Pi, “Milling Surface Roughness Prediction Based on Physics-Informed Machine Learning,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 10. p. 4969, 2023. doi: 10.3390/s23104969.
[17] Umaryadi, Modul Bekerja Dengan Mesin Frais Untuk SMK Teknologi dan Industri. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia Printing, 2007.
[18] G. A. Ibrahim, “Pengaruh Pemesinan Kering Terhadap Kekasaran dan Kekerasan Permukaan Paduan Titanium,” Mech. J. Ilm. Tek. Mesin, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 6–11, 2014.
[19] A. H. Wibowo, “Analisis Pengaruh Feeding Pada Proses End Milling Surface Finish Terhadap Tingkat Kekasaran Permukaan Baja Karbon Rendah,” Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2016.
[20] I. Prakoso, “Analisa Pengaruh Kecepatan Feeding terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Draw Bar Mesin Milling Aciera dengan Proses CNC Turning,” J. Tek. Mesin Mercu Buana, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–6, 2014, doi: 10.22441/jtm.v3i3.1022.
[21] D. E. Prasetyo, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Pengujian Kekasaran Permukaan pada Material Polimer Dan Komposit - Review,” J. Rekayasa Mesin, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 171–175, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.21776/ub.jrm.2015.006.03.6.
[22] S. Y. Lubis, E. Siahaan, and K. Brian, “Pengaruh Kecepatan Potong pada Proses Pembubutan terhadap Surface Roughness dan Topografi Permukaan Material Aluminium Alloy,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi dan Sains II, Jakarta: Universitas Tarumanagara, 2016, pp. 1–10.
[23] C. Asrori, “Pengaruh Variasi Cairan Pendingin Emulsi dan Kecepatan Gerak Pemakanan Baja ST37 Menggunakan Pahat HSS terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan pada Proses Pembubutan,” Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2016.
[24] E. Wiratama, Z. Kurniawan, and Masdani, “Analisis Pengaruh Kecepatan Potong terhadap Laju Pengerjaan Material pada Proses Pembubutan Baja AISI 1045,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Inov. Teknol. Terap., vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 15–21, Aug. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://snitt.polman-babel.ac.id/index.php/snitt/article/view/9
[25] P. Inomec Jaya, “Design Manufacture and Instalation.” PT. Inomec Jaya, Cikupa, Tangerang, 2001.
[26] CNYST, “CNYST KR220 Surface Roughness Tester Instruction Manual.” Manuals+, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://manuals.plus/cnyst/kr220-surface-roughness-tester-manual
[27] B. Darmawan, M. Kusman, and R. A. Hamdani, “The material performance of HSS (high speed steel) tools and its relation with chemical composition and carbide distribution,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 128, no. 1, p. 12027, 2016, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/128/1/012027.
[28] M. R. Harahap, “Pengaruh Kondisi Pemotongan Baja Karbon SC-1045 Menggunakan Pahat HSS terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan pada Proses Pembubutan,” Pist. (Jurnal Ilm. Tek. Mesin Fak. Tek. UISU), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 69–76, 2018.
[29] R. Afriany, B. Ilmi, Asmadi, and I. Effendi, “Pengaruh Gerak Makan terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Baja SS 316L pada Proses Bubut,” Tek. J. Tek., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 185–192, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.35449/teknika.v4i2.73.
[30] D. Joachim, R. Rosehan, and S. Y. Lubis, “Studi Komparasi Pengaruh Kecepatan Potong Tinggi dan Konvensional terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan dan Waktu Proses Bubut,” J. Tek. Ind. Terintegrasi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 279–286, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.31004/jutin.v6i1.16389.
[31] Nurlela and Ikhsanudin, “Efek Perbedaan Kecepatan dan Kedalaman Potong pada Mesin Bubut terhadap Tingkat Kekasaran Benda Kerja ST 37,” J. Tek. Mesin Sinergi, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 198–202, 2023, doi: 10.31963/sinergi.v21i2.3795.
[32] M. Romlie and Sunomo, “Kualitas Permukaan Hasil Pembubutan Dengan Menggunakan Pahat Bubut Hasil Pengembangan,” J. Tek. Mesin, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bambang Herlambang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
