Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Secara Akta Otentik di Tinjau dari Pasal 1868 Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata dalam Proses Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan

Authors

  • Herlina Basri Fakultas Hukum UNPAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v4i2.16144

Keywords:

Evidence, Lawsuit, Authentic Deed

Abstract

The evidence system relies heavily on how a legal expert provides definitions for each of these evidences. Legal experts will, of course, provide a definition by first defining the meaning of a proof. Some experts express their opinion regarding the meaning of the term system of proof as follows: R. Subekti gives insight in evidence, namely the process of proving and convincing the judge of the truth of the arguments put forward by the parties in a dispute argued the process. Sudikno Mertokusumo takes a different view, namely that what is termed in a legal sense from the context of evidence is an attempt to give judges examining the case in question sufficient ground to provide assurance as to the truth of the proposed legal event. Provable are the events or legal relationships presented by the litigants, the dispute or dispute filed by the party but denied or denied by the other party. Evidence is provisions that provide outlines and guidelines about ways justified by law to prove wrongdoing in a dispute. Evidence is also a provision that regulates evidence that is justified by law and can be used by judges in proving a civil dispute. Evidence in Article 1865 of the Civil Code Evidence is: "Anyone who claims to have a right, or who designates an event to confirm his right or to refute a right of another, is obliged to prove the existence of that right or event which is stated". The proof is based on Article 1868 of the Civil Code which states that "an authentic deed is a deed in the form determined by law, made by or before public officials who have power for that at the place where the deed was made.".

References

Buku

F. Sugeng Istanto, “Penelitian Hukumâ€, (Yogyakarta, CV. Ganda, 2007); 29-38, terpetik dari Isra, Saldi, “Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945â€, (Yogyakarta,Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2009); hlm 41

Harahap, M.Yahya, “Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali: Edisi Keduaâ€, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2006), hlm 273

Harahap, M.Yahya, “Hukum Acara Perdataâ€, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2014), hlm 496

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, “Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesiaâ€, edisi ke-II, cet. Ke-1, (Yogyakarta, Liberty, 1985); hlm 45

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, “Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesiaâ€, edisi Revisi, (Yogyakarta, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2017); hlm 110

Mr. A. Pitlo, Pembuktian dan Daluwarsa, PT. Intermasa, Jakarta, 1978

Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Alumni, Bandung, 1983. hlm. 53

R. Subekti, “Hukum Acara Perdataâ€, (Jakarta, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 3 Bina Cipta, 1977); hlm 2

Samosir, Djamanat, “Hukum Acara Perdataâ€, (Bandung, Nuansa Aulia, 2012), hlm156

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji, Sri, “Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkatâ€, (Jakarta, Rajagrafindo Persada, 2006); hlm13

Subekti, “Hukum Acara Perdataâ€, (Jakarta, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Binacipta, 1977).

Subekti_, “Hukum Pembuktianâ€, (Bandung, Binacipta, 1978).

Teguh Samudera, “Hukum Pembuktian dalam Acara Perdataâ€, (Alumni, Bandung, 1992)

PeraturanPerundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)

HIR (Herziene Inlandsch Reglement)

Artikel Seminar/Jurnal/Website

Ali Imron, Muhammad Iqbal, 2019, “Hukum Pembuktian,†Modul Hukum Pembuktian, Unpam Press, Universitas Pamulang.

Anjas Yanasmoro Aji I Nengah Laba, 2018, “Kajian Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negaraâ€, Jurnal Warmadewa, Vol. 2 No. 2, Universitas Warmadewa

Deasy Soeikromo, 2014, “Proses Pembuktian Dan Penggunaan Alat-Alat Bukti Pada Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan†, Jurnal , Vol II No 1, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado.

Efa Laela Fakhriah, 2015, “Perkembangan Alat Bukti dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Menuju Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata,†Vol 1 No 2, Universitas Padjajaran.

Iqbal, Muhamad. "Efektifitas Hukum Dan Upaya Menangkal Hoax Sebagai Konsekuesni Negatif Perkembangan Interkasi Manusia." Literasi Hukum 3.2 (2019): 1-9.

Iqbal, Muhamad. "Implementasi Efektifitas Asas Oportunitas di Indonesia Dengan Landasan Kepentingan Umum." Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 9.1 (2018): 87-100.

Iqbal, Muhamad. "Perkembangan kejahatan dalam upaya penegakan hukum pidana: Penanggulangan kejahatan profesional perdagangan organ tubuh manusia." PROCEEDINGS UNIVERSITAS PAMULANG 2.1 (2017).

Latifah Amir, 2015, “Pembuktian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Dan Perkara Pidanaâ€, Jurnal Nasional Jambi, Universitas Jambi.

Muhammad Iqbal, 2019, “Dokumen Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesiaâ€, Maleo Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019, Universitas Padjajaran

Downloads

Published

2021-12-02