Jaminan Perlindungan Profesi Penilai Publik dalam Konstruksi Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 56/PMK.01/2017 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/Pmk.01/2014 Tentang Penilai Publik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v3i2.8086Keywords:
Public Appraisers, legal certainty, legal protection, professionAbstract
The existence of appraisers in Indonesia has not yet been regulated in aseparate law. The function of appraisers is to increase the society trust.
Appraisal services business is a business that is very vulnerable to the markup game or decrease the value of an asset or property in accordance with the
purpose of the valuation. The collateral appraisal process by the Public
Appraiser must be based on the Indonesian Appraiser Code of Ethics (KEPI)
and the Indonesian Appraisal Standard (SPI) and the facts that are
objectively available. Done without any tendency on personal interests or
influence of the assignor and / or service user. If the appraisal process is not
carried out according to these things, the Public Appraiser can be said to be
malpractice. Therefore, to carry out an assessment needs guidelines or rules,
so that it is not making it up. So far, the rules that form the basis of appraisal
service activities are the Appraisal Services Code of Ethics, the current code
of ethics is the Indonesian Appraiser Code of Ethics (KEPI) and the
Indonesian Valuation Standard (SPI). The two guidelines and rules are
actually not enough to regulate the activities of the Appraisal Service and a
variety of strict regulations are needed, so that it does not cause various
problems as currently. Meanwhile the regulations governing Public
Appraisers are only Ministerial-level Regulations, namely Minister of
Finance Regulation (PMK) No. 56 / PMK.01 / 2017 concerning changes to the
Minister of Finance Regulation (PMK) No. 101 / PMK.01 / 2014 concerning
Public Appraisers which is not equipped with strict sanctions but is limited to
administrative sanctions, so it has not provided legal certainty and guarantee
of protection for the Public Appraiser in carrying out his profession.
References
Bachtiar, 2015, Problematika Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Pengujian UU Terhadap UUD, Jakarta : Raih Asa Sukses (Penebar Swadaya Group).
E. Sumaryono, 1995, Etika Profesi Hukum: Norma-Norma Bagi Penegak Hukum, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Joni Emirzon, 2000, Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perusahaan Jasa Penilai (Appraisal Company), Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
KPSPI MAPPI, KEPI & SPI 2018, Edisi VII, 2018, Jakarta: KPSPI MAPPI.
Yulies Tiena Masriani, 2015, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika Arief Sidharta, 2015, Etika dan Kode Etik Profesi Hukum, Jurnal Universitas Parahyangan
Bachtiar Sibarani, 2002, Soal Hukum Penilaian Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Volume 18.
Doli D. Siregar, â€Penilaian Properti Di era Otonomi Dan Globalisasi (Norma Dan Kondisi Faktual Sistem Penilaian Di Indonesia)â€, disampaikan pada Seminar Sehari Penilaian Properti Di Era Otonomi Dan Globalisasi, Fakultas Ekonomi UNDIP & Kanwil X DJP Propinsi Jateng - DIY, Semarag, 29 Juni 2002.
Joni Emirzon, “Kode Etik dan Permasalahan Hukum Jasa Penilai Dalam Kegiatan Bisnis di Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Sriwijaya Vol. 3, No. 5 Juni 2005.
Lodovicus Lasdi, “Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Rerangka Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan Secara Komprehensif Dalam Lingkungan Bisnis Globalâ€,
Jurnal Widya Manajemen & Akuntansi, Vol. 2 No. 2 Agustus 2002.
Rambat Lupiyoadi, “Dinamika Bisnis Jasa dan Pentingnya Pemasaran Jasa†Yuniar Rachman, “Malpraktik Jasa Penilai Pada Bank Tentang Hasil Laporan Yang Nilainya Melebihi Harga Pasarâ€, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 1 April 2015.
Zaky Baswendra Wibhawa, “Urgensi Peran Appraisal Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Pada Perjanjian Kredit Produktif Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Menurut Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/PMK.01/2014 Tentang Penilai Publikâ€, Privat Law Vol. IV No. 2 Juli – Desember, 2016.
