Business Strategy Development for Indonesian SMEs in Precision Manufacturing: A Case Study of PT. XYZ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v12i1.p264-279.47677Keywords:
Industry 4.0; Competitive Advantage; Business Strategy; SMEs; Mechanical ManufacturerAbstract
The rapid evolution of Industry 4.0, marked by advancements in automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital transformation, is reshaping global manufacturing competitiveness. Indonesia’s manufacturing sector, a key driver of economic growth, faces increasing pressure to adapt to these technological changes while addressing internal inefficiencies and market challenges. This study focuses on PT. XYZ, a precision manufacturing company operating in the SME sector, which has encountered declining revenue and operational bottlenecks despite its strong industry reputation. This research employs a comprehensive strategic analysis using internal (resource analysis, VRIO, value chain analysis) and external (PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces, competitor analysis) frameworks to assess PT. XYZ’s market positioning and business challenges. The study further integrates SWOT and TOWS analysis to formulate strategic business solutions that leverage PT.XYZ’s core strengths, mitigate weaknesses, and capitalize on emerging opportunities in the precision engineering industry. Key findings indicate that PT. XYZ’s competitive advantage lies in its custom job-order specialization and strong client relationships, yet it faces limitations in financial resilience, workforce capabilities, and digital adoption. Based on the analysis, this study proposes an integrated business strategy emphasizing operational efficiency, financial resilience, market expansion, and digital transformation. The recommended implementation plan outlines short-term, medium-term, and long-term initiatives, including supply chain optimization, workforce upskilling, lean manufacturing adoption, and strategic partnerships. The findings contribute to understanding how SMEs in Indonesia’s manufacturing sector can navigate industry challenges, differentiate their offerings, and achieve sustainable growth in an increasingly competitive landscape.
References
Adam, L., & Negara, S. (n.d.). Asean-China Free Trade Agreement: Tantangan Dan Peluang Bagi Indonesia. 36, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14203/JMI.V36I2.633
Atieh, A. M., Cooke, K. O., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2023). The role of intelligent manufacturing systems in the implementation of Industry 4.0 by small and medium enterprises in developing countries. Engineering Reports, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/ENG2.12578
Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M. M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT Analysis Applications: An Integrative Literature Review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148
Broto Legowo, M., & Indiarto, B. (2021). Issues and Challenges in Implementing Industry 4.0 for the Manufacturing Sector in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 25(1), 650. https://doi.org/10.52155/IJPSAT.V25.1.2831
Dr. Swarooprani. K. (2022). An Study of Research Methodology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 537–543. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2293175
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management : Competitiveness & Globalization (12e ed.). Cengage Learning.
Irjayanti, M., & Azis, A. M. (2012). Barrier Factors and Potential Solutions for Indonesian SMEs. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00315-2
Kotler, P., & Amstrong, G. (2018). Principles of Marketing (17th ed.). Pearson.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15e ed.). Pearson Education.
Shao, X. F., & Dong, M. (2012). Comparison of order-fulfilment performance in MTO and MTS systems with an inventory cost budget constraint. International Journal of Production Research, 50(7), 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.562562
Rezqianita, B. L., & Ardi, R. (2020). Drivers and Barriers of Industry 4.0 Adoption in Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/3400934.3400958
Rufaidah, P. (2012). Manajemen Strategik. Unpad Press.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley & Sons.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Statista Market Insight. (2024). Industry 4.0: in-depth market analysis Market Insights report INDUSTRIES & MARKETS.
Wandebori, H. (2019). Manajemen Strategi Dalam Perspektif Indonesia.
Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix—A Tool for Situational Analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
INOVASI: journal of managenet have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, INOVASI: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.







