Formulation of Objective and Key Result and Key Performance Indicator Framework as a Performance Measurement System in Yayasan Perdamaian Indonesia

Authors

  • Khisi Kinanti Universitas Indonesia
  • Dwi Hartanti Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v12i2.p558-569.56145

Keywords:

Nonprofit Organization; Performance Measurement; OKR; KPI; Fundraising

Abstract

Nonprofit organizations increasingly face pressure from donors to demonstrate accountability, transparency, and measurable impact beyond program outputs. Yayasan Perdamaian Indonesia (YPI) has experienced a sustained decline in external funding over the past six years despite expanding program activities, indicating the absence of an effective performance measurement system to support fundraising credibility. This study aims to formulate an integrated Objectives and Key Results (OKR) and Key Performance Indicators (KPI) framework as a performance measurement system to strengthen YPI’s external fundraising capacity. A qualitative single-case study approach was employed, with YPI as the unit of analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, a focus group discussion, non-participant observations, internal document analysis, and benchmarking with nonprofit organizations in Malaysia and the Philippines. The data were analyzed using thematic narrative analysis. The findings reveal critical organizational challenges, including weak program documentation, fragmented impact reporting, limited strategic communication, and underdeveloped partnership management. Based on these findings, four strategic OKR objectives were formulated and translated into a set of operational KPIs covering documentation, fundraising, communication, and partnerships. The proposed OKR KPI framework provides a structured and measurable mechanism to align strategic objectives with operational performance, enhance organizational accountability, and improve YPI’s ability to attract sustainable external funding.

References

Akhtar, M. W., & Sultan, S. (2022). Integrating OKRs and KPIs for performance management: A strategic alignment perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5), 1483-1502.

Al Thinyan, A. A., Al Rasheed, R. A., & AlGhamdi, A. A. (2022). Key performance indicators and organizational performance: Evidence from nonprofit organizations. Journal of Management Development, 41(6), 391-405.

Al-Saadi, R., Abdallah, A. B., & Dahiyat, S. E. (2023). Strategic performance measurement systems and organizational performance: Evidence from nonprofit and public sector organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(2), 345-369.

Cestari, J. M. A. P., Tavares Treinta, F., Moura, L. F., Munik, J., Pinheiro de Lima, E., Deschamps, F., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Van Aken, E. M., Rosa Leite, L., & Duarte, R. (2022). The characteristics of nonprofit performance measurement systems. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(11-12), 1295-1325.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2019). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dillard, J. (2020). Accounting and accountability in nonprofit organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(2), 337-366.

Garcia, A., Calvo-Mora, A., & Picón-Berjoyo, A. (2021). The use of performance management systems in nonprofit organizations: Effects on strategy and results. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(9-10), 1032-1050.

Hani, S., & Kustini, E. (2025). Integrating OKR and KPI to improve organizational performance accountability. Journal of Performance Management, 12(1), 45-58.

Hastuty, R., & Priono, H. (2021). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit organizations: Evidence from social foundations. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 25(2), 101-115.

Kim, S., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2019). Performance measurement and donor decision making in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(4), 485-503.

Moxham, C. (2014). Understanding third sector performance measurement system design: A literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(6), 704-726.

Nasution, F. A., & Rossieta, H. (2023). Objectives and key results versus balanced scorecard as strategic control systems in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 19(3), 412-430.

Niven, P. R., & Lamorte, B. (2016). Objectives and key results: Driving focus, alignment, and engagement with OKRs. John Wiley & Sons.

Poister, T. H., Aristigueta, M. P., & Hall, J. L. (2019). Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Poister, T. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Edwards, L. H. (2015). Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. public sector. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 1-11.

Rompho, N. (2024). Do objectives and key results solve organizational performance measurement issues? Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(3), 669-682.

Salamon, L. M. (2002). The state of nonprofit America. Brookings Institution Press.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Suriyanti, L., Wijaya, H., & Putri, D. A. (2025). Challenges in implementing objectives and key results in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 21(1), 88-105.

Yin, R. K. (2021). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Kinanti, K., & Hartanti, D. (2025). Formulation of Objective and Key Result and Key Performance Indicator Framework as a Performance Measurement System in Yayasan Perdamaian Indonesia. INOVASI, 12(2), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v12i2.p558-569.56145

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): Inovasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

INOVASI: journal of managenet have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities,  INOVASI: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.